- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/13/25 at 2:38 pm to winkchance
quote:
You do not have to like it.
what? Yes, it suggests that the parasite causes inflammation in mice, could also cause chronic inflammation in human prostates, and chronic inflammation is widely considered to be a cause for cancer. It suggest further research, most notably in "non genetically modified mice".
That statement isn't remotely close to this statement.
quote:
Toxoplasma gondii mentioned in this study is considered one of the major causes for prostate cancer tumors that can go from benign to cancerous.
Posted on 1/13/25 at 2:42 pm to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
Why don't places like China cure cancer then?
Chyner tranna kill folks, not extend lives.
Posted on 1/13/25 at 2:50 pm to Evolved Simian
quote:
I'm not sure how that gets turned into "curing cancer".
It's what happens when retards extrapolate.
WRONG. My wife went through breast cancer last year. We personally met with & spoke with numerous others diagnosed with breast cancer (other cancers too, even stage 4 pancreatic that's usually a death sentence) that legitimately cured their cancer, as in no more tumors at all in their screenings. As in zero METS, and NED. Several of these people had gone through chemo and/or radiation previously, still had scans showing stable tumors and some that were still actively growing based off their previous scans, then went to just Ivermectin & Fenbendazole supplements CURED them. Some also took other supplements in addition to IV & Fenben, but all of these were "alternative" methods that were absolutely not prescribed by their Oncologist.
My wife's case is slightly different as she started taking ivermecting & fenbendazole and had her tumor removed and several lymph nodes, only one of which tested positive, and her next scan was clean. We still did several rounds of chemo, but kept a close eye on her overall wellbeing and we were fortunate that she did not have as many adverse side effects that other have, or else we would have stopped and stuck with just ivermecting & fenbendazole.
Posted on 1/13/25 at 3:00 pm to kaleidoscoping
I'm very certain I know more about cancer, it's causes and treatments than you do.
And I sincerely wish I didn't...
And I sincerely wish I didn't...
Posted on 1/13/25 at 3:02 pm to Doug_H
Best of luck. 
This post was edited on 1/13/25 at 3:10 pm
Posted on 1/13/25 at 3:05 pm to winkchance
If it doesn’t work, I think you can potentially eliminate yourself from trials at MDA etc. You might not need to enter a trial, but it’s something to consider.
Posted on 1/13/25 at 3:11 pm to N2cars
That's possible. It still doesn't make sense to me why you would be against having an open mind about other cures, natural or alternative.
This post was edited on 1/13/25 at 3:13 pm
Posted on 1/13/25 at 3:17 pm to kaleidoscoping
Don't mince words with me...
I'd jump in front of a moving train if it would cure MBC...
Unproven, untrialed, anecdotal bs isn't a "cure".
And, here's a shocker:
The overwhelming majority of people that are diagnosed with cancer survive and get better.
I'd jump in front of a moving train if it would cure MBC...
Unproven, untrialed, anecdotal bs isn't a "cure".
And, here's a shocker:
The overwhelming majority of people that are diagnosed with cancer survive and get better.
Posted on 1/13/25 at 3:25 pm to Doug_H
If your wife isn't taking Tamoxofen, you're a foolish person. (Likely prescribed, depending on genetic composition).
You were given a gift, don't blow it.
You were given a gift, don't blow it.
Posted on 1/13/25 at 3:36 pm to winkchance
look up Methylene blue and Fenbendazole
Posted on 1/13/25 at 3:39 pm to GrizzlyAlloy
Methylene blue has been investigated for its potential roles in cancer research and treatment, though it's important to understand that much of this research is still in preliminary stages. Here are some key points regarding methylene blue and its relationship with cancer:
Anticancer Properties:
Antioxidant and Pro-oxidant Effects: Methylene blue can act both as an antioxidant, reducing oxidative stress, and under certain conditions as a pro-oxidant, which could selectively kill cancer cells by increasing oxidative stress in them.
Mitochondrial Targeting: Since methylene blue can accumulate in mitochondria, it might affect cancer cell metabolism. Many cancer cells rely heavily on mitochondrial function for their altered metabolism (Warburg effect), and targeting this could potentially inhibit cancer cell growth.
Photodynamic Therapy (PDT):
Photosensitizer: Methylene blue is used in photodynamic therapy for cancer, where it's applied to cancer cells or tissues and then activated by light. The light activation leads to the production of reactive oxygen species that can kill cancer cells by causing oxidative damage.
Research and Clinical Trials:
Selective Cytotoxicity: Some studies suggest that methylene blue might preferentially kill cancer cells over normal cells due to differences in cellular metabolism or environment, although this is not universally accepted and needs further validation.
Combination Therapies: There's research into using methylene blue in combination with other cancer treatments like chemotherapy or radiation to enhance their efficacy or reduce side effects.
Challenges and Considerations:
Toxicity and Dosage: High concentrations of methylene blue can be toxic, and finding the right therapeutic window is crucial for its safe use in cancer treatment.
Clinical Evidence: Most of the evidence for methylene blue's anticancer effects comes from in vitro studies or small animal models. Human clinical trials are less common, and more robust clinical data are needed to confirm its efficacy and safety for cancer treatment.
Anticancer Properties:
Antioxidant and Pro-oxidant Effects: Methylene blue can act both as an antioxidant, reducing oxidative stress, and under certain conditions as a pro-oxidant, which could selectively kill cancer cells by increasing oxidative stress in them.
Mitochondrial Targeting: Since methylene blue can accumulate in mitochondria, it might affect cancer cell metabolism. Many cancer cells rely heavily on mitochondrial function for their altered metabolism (Warburg effect), and targeting this could potentially inhibit cancer cell growth.
Photodynamic Therapy (PDT):
Photosensitizer: Methylene blue is used in photodynamic therapy for cancer, where it's applied to cancer cells or tissues and then activated by light. The light activation leads to the production of reactive oxygen species that can kill cancer cells by causing oxidative damage.
Research and Clinical Trials:
Selective Cytotoxicity: Some studies suggest that methylene blue might preferentially kill cancer cells over normal cells due to differences in cellular metabolism or environment, although this is not universally accepted and needs further validation.
Combination Therapies: There's research into using methylene blue in combination with other cancer treatments like chemotherapy or radiation to enhance their efficacy or reduce side effects.
Challenges and Considerations:
Toxicity and Dosage: High concentrations of methylene blue can be toxic, and finding the right therapeutic window is crucial for its safe use in cancer treatment.
Clinical Evidence: Most of the evidence for methylene blue's anticancer effects comes from in vitro studies or small animal models. Human clinical trials are less common, and more robust clinical data are needed to confirm its efficacy and safety for cancer treatment.
Posted on 1/13/25 at 3:42 pm to winkchance
One thing to warn about taking Ivermectin as a prophylactic to cancer is that you want to get your blood cells checked every 6 months or so.
I found that me taking a click of horse paste every week had raised something out of range (i can post what it was later - can't remember right now... something like my red blood cells became too few and too large).
Taking a break from it for a couple of months until I get back in range.
I found that me taking a click of horse paste every week had raised something out of range (i can post what it was later - can't remember right now... something like my red blood cells became too few and too large).
Taking a break from it for a couple of months until I get back in range.
This post was edited on 1/13/25 at 3:43 pm
Posted on 1/13/25 at 3:58 pm to greenbean
Are you seriously trying to argue that someone with Type 1 diabetes is a conspiracy of big pharma? You do realize prior to the last 60 years or so people with Type 1 diabetes rarely made it out of their childhood? Type 2 diabetes is 100% preventable and manageable by diet or pancreas supplements; Type 1 diabetics don’t produce insulin and no diet or remedy will fix that lol. Some of y’all will believe anything
Posted on 1/13/25 at 3:58 pm to winkchance
Parasites aren’t a big deal, per se. Parasitic infections/infestations on the other hand? Not exactly an ideal situation. A “healthy” immune system will keep the infestation scenario at bay, but a non-maintained immune system invites big issues in this regard. Which in turn weakens the immune system even worse, then it’s a tough cycle to break. Not impossible, but tough. Vitamins, exercise and most importantly proper hygiene practices is the key - but isn’t it for everything? Lol
The worst part of it is that you can live with a parasitic infection/infestation for years and not realize it. All you know is at some point in time that you can’t exactly pinpoint, you lost your zeal, became apathetic, lethargic, no “energy.” I think ivermectin should be a regular maintenance medicine in this nasty overpopulated topsy turvy crazy mixed up world. JMO bros.
Oh, and I do not think the “government” or healthcare sector want us to know about the likely higher incidence rates of this occurring across the populace.
The worst part of it is that you can live with a parasitic infection/infestation for years and not realize it. All you know is at some point in time that you can’t exactly pinpoint, you lost your zeal, became apathetic, lethargic, no “energy.” I think ivermectin should be a regular maintenance medicine in this nasty overpopulated topsy turvy crazy mixed up world. JMO bros.
Oh, and I do not think the “government” or healthcare sector want us to know about the likely higher incidence rates of this occurring across the populace.
Posted on 1/13/25 at 4:09 pm to Salmon
Sugar feeds inflammation and the average US diet is full of sugar, it isn’t rocket science or a secret but people on this board love a good conspiracy. Does big pharma make a fortune off of fatties, smokers, and the unhealthy? Absolutely, but if you want to blame anyone it’s the FDA that allows our food supply to be full of corn syrup and corn starch which are both processed by the human body the same way alcohol is processed. It is essentially poison and greatly over works the liver, pancreas, and gallbladder leading to obesity/type 2 diabetes. The over supply of sugars in the body feed inflammation which also leads to joint pain, and bowel disease. Severely limiting the intake of processed sugars would do wonders for everyone, not some goofy medicinal cure which was produced by the same pharmaceutical companies that are supposed to be the enemy or so I am told lol
Posted on 1/13/25 at 4:10 pm to N2cars
quote:
Ask the admins to move this to the "Idiot Board "
You plan on following it over there?
We returned from vacation in early 2020 and 4 in our group brought back Covid. The next morning they didnt even feel like getting out of bed
3 of them used ivermectin, and were symptom free within 24 to 48 hours. The 4th went almost 2 weeks before their fever broke
Posted on 1/13/25 at 4:19 pm to Doug_H
That’s because breast cancer is highly treatable through surgery not ivermectin. I hate to burst your bubble and there is a zero percent chance someone with stage 4 pancreatic cancer was cured with ivermectin or any other drug for that matter. IF that person were cancer free it was by the grace of God because you can’t be a human without your pancreas which is why it is so difficult to treat not a conspiracy theory. Virtually every other organ in your body is receptive to surgery with the pancreas being the lone wolf, while it is possible for a very specific, extremely limited surgical procedure on the pancreas. You would have to be one of the few whose cancer is caught early in that very limited portion of the pancreas that is receptive to surgery.
Posted on 1/13/25 at 4:22 pm to RobbBobb
Most people don’t need to take anything for Covid or most other common illnesses, why would you or anyone take unnecessary medications?
Posted on 1/13/25 at 4:25 pm to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
Why don't places like China cure cancer then?
They don't give a frick about american pharma profits.
You are nieve if you don't think China and Pharma aren't in bed together. Just Google them and you will see how much they profit off each other. Plenty of articles on it.
Page 4 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News