Started By
Message

re: OT PHOTOGRAPHERS: Sony, Canon, or Nikon? Help me pick a new camera

Posted on 4/8/20 at 1:23 pm to
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
53509 posts
Posted on 4/8/20 at 1:23 pm to
My everyday camera is a Fuji XT-20 mirrorless with a 35mm lens. Love this camera.

I'll bring out the dslr with the 70-200mm for certain situations, but I love the look of Fuji's photos. The body also looks like an old school film camera.
Posted by Vincent van Goat
Member since Feb 2019
38 posts
Posted on 4/8/20 at 2:29 pm to
is the sony a7 not full frame?

Seems like Sony is almost a consensus here

Now i need to find the model
This post was edited on 4/8/20 at 2:32 pm
Posted by Vincent van Goat
Member since Feb 2019
38 posts
Posted on 4/8/20 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

If you want to get into photography, buy nice, high dollar, used equipment in either Canon or Nikon.


model suggestions? definitely want to buy used

quote:

If you want to just take garden variety pictures, go with a new Sony mirrorless


I liked the A7 until you said this. dont want "garden variety photos"
Posted by Shotgun Willie
Member since Apr 2016
4279 posts
Posted on 4/8/20 at 2:44 pm to
Sony a7iii is full frame. The Sony a7series is anything but garden variety. And you should be shooting RAW if at all possible to get full advantage of processing etc.
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87347 posts
Posted on 4/8/20 at 2:49 pm to
Well it's shite advice so I wouldn't worry about it

Someone really should tell the Sony shooters like Chris Burkard that they're not real photographers anymore now that they've left Canon/Nikon for Sony. I've never, ever, heard anyone claim Sony is lifeless compared to Nikon or Canon. All three are "boring" compared to Fuji (or Leica, of course), but all three are absolutely pro photographer tools. The reality us you can make great, lively photos with any system, but particularly with all of the big 4 discussed in this thread.

The A7 series is a great line.
Posted by FLBooGoTigs1
Nocatee, FL.
Member since Jan 2008
59271 posts
Posted on 4/8/20 at 2:50 pm to
My wife (no pics)has done photography pretty much her whole life and she uses Nikon.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
95636 posts
Posted on 4/8/20 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

Sony a7iii is full frame.


That's my bad - the A7 is a full frame MILC, just with a dizzying array of specs depending on what you want.

I haven't even really shopped the A5000 or A6000 lines, but my mental model had me thinking the A7 was APS-C and the A9 was full frame (not the case).

Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
95636 posts
Posted on 4/8/20 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

Someone really should tell the Sony shooters like Chris Burkard that they're not real photographers anymore now that they've left Canon/Nikon for Sony.


It's been a remarkable 3 or 4 years for Sony's digital camera division, particularly in light of Canon's slow start (and somewhat of a fumble) with their MILCs.
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
62079 posts
Posted on 4/8/20 at 3:08 pm to
I have a Nikon D750, but if I ever get enough money to swap to a mirrorless, I’ll want something like the Sony a7r lll
Posted by cattus
Member since Jan 2009
15945 posts
Posted on 4/8/20 at 3:11 pm to
Nikon
Posted by tigerpawl
Can't get there from here.
Member since Dec 2003
22628 posts
Posted on 4/8/20 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

Besides, I’d work on always improving composition skills.
This is more important than equipment selection, IMHO. Also, hone your "developing" skills with Adobe products (LR; Photoshop; Plugins).


Posted by JudgeRoyBean
West of the Pecos
Member since Jun 2018
538 posts
Posted on 4/8/20 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

I have a Nikon D750, but if I ever get enough money to swap to a mirrorless, I’ll want something like the Sony a7r lll


I have a Nikon D500. And when/should I wear it out, I'll look at MILC at that time and see what is good then. Of course I'm assuming I'll have the needed cash.
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
28570 posts
Posted on 4/8/20 at 3:23 pm to
Fuji all day, XT-3 or XT-4. If you are a hipster and don't want to change lenses, X-100f or X-100V. If you are down-market, XT-30.

If you will be shooting a lot of HD video, get the best Sony you can afford.
This post was edited on 4/8/20 at 3:24 pm
Posted by tigerpawl
Can't get there from here.
Member since Dec 2003
22628 posts
Posted on 4/8/20 at 3:34 pm to
quote:

Had been previously using iPhone 11, but want to join the big leagues.
Shakespeare once wrote: "The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers". You can also apply this to good photography: "The first thing we do, let's kill all the iPhones".



Posted by RoIITide
Member since Dec 2010
1001 posts
Posted on 4/8/20 at 3:44 pm to
I like Canon mid/higher end dslr’s but also have Sony and a Fuji p&s. It’ll be easier to find used quality glass/accessories if you go Nikon or Canon - but you can’t go wrong with whatever you decide on. Sony used to get dinged for not having a ton of non-sony accessories that didn’t work as well as Sony brand stuff, but Sony makes very good cameras.

One thing to add is that Nikon is letting people do the online learning classes free this month. That might give you some insight to their stuff .....

Nikon free classes
LINK
Posted by LSUgusto
Member since May 2005
19311 posts
Posted on 4/8/20 at 3:44 pm to
Nikon has a ton of built-in features.
Canon is more user friendly.

If you don't have a lot of money for lenses or post-production software, probably Nikon is best for you. Canon is the better camera, though.

Think of it like buying a car for joyriding. If you like to tinker under the hood, go with Nikon. If you just want to get in the car and drive, buy a Canon.
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87347 posts
Posted on 4/8/20 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

Nikon has a ton of built-in features.
Canon is more user friendly.

If you don't have a lot of money for lenses or post-production software, probably Nikon is best for you. Canon is the better camera, though.

Think of it like buying a car for joyriding. If you like to tinker under the hood, go with Nikon. If you just want to get in the car and drive, buy a Canon.


Apologies to you, but this is the most ridiculous post in a thread full of them



Posted by DLauw
SWLA
Member since Sep 2011
6194 posts
Posted on 4/8/20 at 3:51 pm to
Used Canon full frame and that nifty 50 (50mm 1.4) And you’ll be set for learning. If you’re just going to set it to auto, than save your money and keep using your phone.

Buy Bryan Peterson’s book “understanding exposure”
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299430 posts
Posted on 4/8/20 at 3:53 pm to
quote:

Sony a7iii is full frame.


Big issue with full frame is cost and range of available lenses.

Ive resisted the urge for full frame for that reason.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299430 posts
Posted on 4/8/20 at 3:54 pm to
quote:

is the sony a7 not full frame?


It is. And the old standard A7 is a hell of a sub $1k camera. But then you gotta buy the lenses.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram