re: One of the best arrest melts of all time

quote:

---

Where is the evidence that she did that?

---

Quite the crawfish from "throwing rocks at people is ok" to "well there's no evidence of that"

quote:

---

Tossing rocks and discharging a firearm are not similar.

---

quote:

---

If your argument is that she didn’t actually strike them with the thrown objects, that isn’t a very good one.

---

Not my argument.

quote:

---

She admitted to throwing an object.

---

She is allowed to toss items into her yard.

quote:

---

She threw an object in the vicinity of the officers and, even if she did not strike them, the implication is that she attempted to, not to mention that the officers were actively leaving at the time.

---

People are not convicted because of an assumed implication, particularly when it rubs against protected activity. It requires evidence.

Officers leaving would enhance her case, not diminish it. She is angry, she never throws anything at them while cussing them out, but when they leave she throws rocks in the yard, not in their direction, and fully protected as an activity a property owner / resident can do. You're asking me to believe she thought she could get away with throwing rocks at police, then not only try to just deny it, but do so while she has a ring camera that she obviously knows about because she pleaded with them to look at the video to prove her case. I can buy an argument that she lost her temper and threw at police, but that position is then eroded by her immediate insistence that her own ring camera would prove her innocence.

That ring video may show her to be a criminal, but I'm not seeing any evidence of it so far. If the police were so confident rocks were thrown at them, why didn't they go look at that video immediately to lock this thing up? She was clearly willing to show them. It would take a minute or so to pull it up. Doing so may have sealed this up completely, one way or another. This works against the police and in her favor, until the video can be seen.

quote:

---

That aside, do you know how she could have avoided this?

By not acting like a moron.

If she had not tried to “keep it real”, that video would be 30 seconds long and very boring.

---

100% correct.

quote:

---

You still get a presumption of innocence in this country.

---

IN COURT. Cops are not court.

If we had a way to figure out how people would turn out while they were in the womb, her alone is an excellent argument on why abortion should be legal.
In some cases like this, mandatory.

quote:

---

and you don't think the presumption of innocence applies

---

We aren't a court We don't need to go through the whole trial to evaluate what happened here. There facts are the facts. She 100% misused 911. There is no question that didn't happen. There is also no question she threw rocks. in the yard occupied by the cops. She herself said she did.

If this was a 300lb black man instead of a young bouncy titty'ed ho, you wouldn't be making all these ridiculous posts.

quote:

---

This is a criminal matter and you don't think the presumption of innocence applies

---

Cops are supposed to litigate a trial before arresting someone? How are any arrests legal if cops must presume innocence in real time?

Yeah I’m a piece of shite so I’m telling here “I can’t get your dog in a legal capacity tonight but when I get off work me and you going to get that dog”. I’d get to see them titties and get some crazy pussy.

quote:

---

This is not court. The officers acted on what the believed was happening at the time. The presenting of evidence is a later job for the lawyers.

---

They had no evidence that she threw anything at them, only a question - when they turned around she presented no threat - as they ran toward her, nothing was thrown, they never mention "she's got something in her hand" or "she has more rocks" or "put that down" or anything of the sort. In those several seconds every bit of information they had indicated there was no threat. They still went forward. And when a reasonable explanation was given they did nothing to see if it was true, despite being offered that video. They went from facing no threat at all, to a potential arrest, and had the chance to see if an arrest was warranted and they could not be bothered to look at a few seconds of video. I know she acted like a jackass, but come on, look at the ring video and see if she's telling the truth. How hard is that?