Started By
Message

re: One of the best arrest melts of all time

Posted on 5/21/24 at 11:25 am to
Posted by Shite_kicker
The boot
Member since Nov 2022
187 posts
Posted on 5/21/24 at 11:25 am to
Them thangs was thangin’
Posted by POTUS2024
Member since Nov 2022
11953 posts
Posted on 5/21/24 at 11:26 am to
quote:

so after she makes a false 911 call

Not a false 911 call. She believed it was a matter for the police to handle. She had called twice. That's not grounds for an arrest. It is grounds to let her know not to clog up the lines, which would be something they could roll her up for if she continued calling.

quote:

verbally abusing 3 police officers for 10 mins

protected speech

quote:

she just decided to skip some stones as soon as they turn their back to her?

Is she not allowed to do that?

Her behavior is disgusting but people are allowed to be idiots and jackasses and all sorts of stuff. That is protected.

What you're doing is painting a picture of LE violating her rights as a result of her exercising her rights. She's clearly a jackass, but no evidence here shows she is a criminal. We really need that ring video.
Posted by L S Usetheforce
Member since Jun 2004
22806 posts
Posted on 5/21/24 at 11:26 am to
No we don’t. She is guilty as frick.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
96814 posts
Posted on 5/21/24 at 11:27 am to
Twice? No, the cops SHOWED UP twice. She called significantly more times than that and dispatch sent them back because it was so many times.
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
25986 posts
Posted on 5/21/24 at 11:29 am to
quote:

She says she threw a rock into her yard. A rock making a noise when it hit the ground means nothing. Did it hit one of those guys? Did it roll up on one of their boots? Just how far away do the police have to get before you can do things on your own property and exercise your rights as an American? Or, are the police such a special anointed class that you can't do anything in their presence?


Don’t worry bud. You’re clearly in the lead now.
Posted by CatsGoneWild
Pigeon forge, Tennessee
Member since Jan 2008
13416 posts
Posted on 5/21/24 at 11:30 am to
Florida…
What a surprise
Posted by Thracken13
Aft Cargo Hold of Serenity
Member since Feb 2010
16184 posts
Posted on 5/21/24 at 11:31 am to
quote:

If the cops treated her like someone who was clearly having issues, told her not to call again, and left...maybe no issue. If she called again, arrest.


they did treat her. the one cop tried to explain to her why she could not repeatedly call 911. she was told the cops could not help, and it was a civil issue - and was the 2nd visit for them to the house.

kind of hard to get words out to the person, when they scream racist bullshite and expletive's at the cops every time he tries to explain things.

and the cop even says, they are trying to get confirmation that she was in fact the person calling 911, and once they got it they go to leave - and then shite went off the deep end.
Posted by chinhoyang
Member since Jun 2011
23760 posts
Posted on 5/21/24 at 11:32 am to
quote:


Her behavior is disgusting but people are allowed to be idiots and jackasses and all sorts of stuff. That is protected.


If she actually threw rocks at the cops, it would not be protected "speech."
Posted by Cracker
in a box
Member since Nov 2009
17869 posts
Posted on 5/21/24 at 11:33 am to
Just a feral in their natural habitat
Posted by POTUS2024
Member since Nov 2022
11953 posts
Posted on 5/21/24 at 11:34 am to
quote:

We know that you can't do either at someone, much less a cop.


Where is the evidence that she did anything, directed at any of those men?

quote:

Now show me the distinction in the law that makes them different for one to not garner arrest?

Sure, as soon as you show me where she fired a projectile of any sort at these officers.
Posted by POTUS2024
Member since Nov 2022
11953 posts
Posted on 5/21/24 at 11:36 am to
quote:

If she actually threw rocks at the cops, it would not be protected "speech."


I never made that claim. Her verbal stuff is protected. Throwing rocks in her yard is protected. You still get a presumption of innocence in this country.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72362 posts
Posted on 5/21/24 at 11:40 am to
quote:

Sure, as soon as you show me where she fired a projectile of any sort at these officers.
She stated that she threw rocks.

If your argument is that she didn’t actually strike them with the thrown objects, that isn’t a very good one.

She admitted to throwing an object.

She clearly missed the officers, but that isn’t a valid defense. She threw an object in the vicinity of the officers and, even if she did not strike them, the implication is that she attempted to, not to mention that the officers were actively leaving at the time.


That aside, do you know how she could have avoided this?

By not acting like a moron.

If she had not tried to “keep it real”, that video would be 30 seconds long and very boring.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84464 posts
Posted on 5/21/24 at 11:41 am to
quote:

hrowing rocks in her yard is protected.
The frick it is. Like you were told earlier, being a bad throw is not a defense.
Posted by Cell of Awareness
Member since Jan 2024
203 posts
Posted on 5/21/24 at 11:41 am to
quote:

Agree with this, they should've just fricked off when she told them to. They told her they weren't going to help her, at that point get the frick off of her property.


If there is no penalty or understanding of the ramifications of abusing 911 then how will you feel when there is a violent rapist trying to bust into your wife, mother, sister or daughter's home but the cops are late because some sleazy subhumans keep calling the police to their home over something they have already explained they cannot handle. The officer was calmly trying to get the slut to understand the law on this and she refused to acknowledge. Without that it was likely she would call again and again.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72362 posts
Posted on 5/21/24 at 11:42 am to
quote:

Throwing rocks in her yard is protected.
Sure, but not in the vicinity of police officers, considering the implication when combined with her already aggressive behavior.
quote:

You still get a presumption of innocence in this country.
Yes, you do.

She can argue her case in court.
Posted by POTUS2024
Member since Nov 2022
11953 posts
Posted on 5/21/24 at 11:44 am to
quote:

Don’t worry bud. You’re clearly in the lead now.


I see you still have no argument and no evidence that she committed a crime. Give me a time stamp in the video that shows her throwing rocks at the police. Or one where an officer is hit with rocks. Or one where a rock clearly rolls past an officer - just something that shows she threw rocks at them. Anything at all besides, "Did she just throw rocks at us?"
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84464 posts
Posted on 5/21/24 at 11:46 am to
quote:

see you still have no argument and no evidence that she committed a crime.


Misuse of 911 is a crime in FL.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72362 posts
Posted on 5/21/24 at 11:47 am to
quote:

Give me a time stamp in the video that shows her throwing rocks at the police
At 0:01 seconds in the video, she states, “I threw rocks in my yard”.

She admitted to throwing rocks in her yard, the yard the officers are currently standing in.

Do you expect her to admit that she was trying to hit the officers?
Posted by chinhoyang
Member since Jun 2011
23760 posts
Posted on 5/21/24 at 11:49 am to
quote:

Throwing rocks in her yard is protected


The presumption of innocence has nothing to do with this situation. The kid who mows down other kids at a school has the same presumption - doesn't mean his conduct is "protected."

You completely ignore context.

It is perfectly legal for me to fire a pistol shot into my front grass. But, if there a cops at my house, I likely have committed an assault. She admitted throwing rocks and you could hear the rocks hit, and in that context, it is not unreasonable that the police had a well founded fear that violence was imminent.

Florida law: "(1) An “assault” is an intentional, unlawful threat by word or act to do violence to the person of another, coupled with an apparent ability to do so, and doing some act which creates a well-founded fear in such other person that such violence is imminent.

"I just decided this was a good time to throw rocks, but I wasn't throwing at the cops."

You must be trolling and I know better than to respond. You truly can't be this stupid.
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
36362 posts
Posted on 5/21/24 at 11:51 am to
I'd bet this psycho has accused every ex-boyfriend she's ever had of a crime, be it rape, assault or theft. She's absolutely unhinged.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram