Started By
Message

re: Oklahoma School First In US To Use Bulletproof Shelters To Keep Kids Safe During A Shootin

Posted on 3/2/18 at 12:37 pm to
Posted by Damone
FoCo
Member since Aug 2016
32520 posts
Posted on 3/2/18 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

This is what this country has come to.

Putting bulletproof shelters in classrooms.

It's attitudes like this that keep schools from taking the uncomfortable but necessary precautions to protect students.
Posted by Jon Ham
Member since Jun 2011
28526 posts
Posted on 3/2/18 at 12:44 pm to
People often forget that along with freedom comes responsibility. People want their freedoms without the responsibility. The Founding Fathers probably didn’t feel the need to write in a “personal responsibility” provision in the Constituion since back then such virtue was a given and not something one could to take or leave.

If we want a society with loose gun laws, and we are aware of the risk, however small, that such laws will allow from time to time a mass shooter to shoot up a school, it is our responsibility to do what we can within reason to protect the kids.

To me, if gun enthusiasts collectively have to pay $25 million per child’s life saved by the shelter, that’s “within reason.” At what number does it become not “within reason?”
Posted by MLCLyons
Member since Nov 2012
4707 posts
Posted on 3/2/18 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

Would you prefer these in every classroom or a cop at every school?


The cost of putting one of these in every classroom would be insane. And how do you expect a school district to pay for this without raising taxes which is hard to do.

Cops too expensive too.
Posted by Jon Ham
Member since Jun 2011
28526 posts
Posted on 3/2/18 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

But I don't, so frick your appeal to emotion.


My hypothetical clearly caused you some emotion. Why you mad? Don’t like that it was so easy for me to show how hollow “it doesn’t happen often so it’s not worth it” is? You really getting mad over a proposal to increase gun sale taxes by 1% with no new restrictions on gun sales/ownership?
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171035 posts
Posted on 3/2/18 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

To me, if gun enthusiasts collectively have to pay $25 million per child’s life saved by the shelter, that’s “within reason.” At what number does it become not “within reason?”


$25 million per .000000003% of the population
Posted by DeafJam73
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
18397 posts
Posted on 3/2/18 at 12:53 pm to
Still pointless with nothing to counter the shooter. What if the shooter decides to open up in the cafeteria during lunch? You don’t think the shooter will plan around that?
Posted by DeafJam73
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
18397 posts
Posted on 3/2/18 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

People who want the freedom to purchase guns with minimal restrictions should acknowledge such freedom may result in a mass shooter from time to time and be willing to bear some of the cost to mitigate the loss of life.


What a bunch of shite.
Posted by Jon Ham
Member since Jun 2011
28526 posts
Posted on 3/2/18 at 12:57 pm to
No you’re a bunch of shite!!!!
Posted by Houma Sapien
up the bayou
Member since Jul 2013
1688 posts
Posted on 3/2/18 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

What a bunch of shite.


Thanks for the details
Posted by DeafJam73
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
18397 posts
Posted on 3/2/18 at 12:57 pm to
K
Posted by TigerstuckinMS
Member since Nov 2005
33687 posts
Posted on 3/2/18 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

My hypothetical clearly caused you some emotion. Why you mad? Don’t like that it was so easy for me to show how hollow “it doesn’t happen often so it’s not worth it” is? You really getting mad over a proposal to increase gun sale taxes by 1% with no new restrictions on gun sales/ownership?


No. It's because "but think of the children" is all you have and we don't call that an "argument", we call that a "logical fallacy", and some of us don't want to make or change laws based on logical fallacies.
This post was edited on 3/2/18 at 12:59 pm
Posted by DeafJam73
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
18397 posts
Posted on 3/2/18 at 1:00 pm to
quote:


Thanks for the details


Fine. Here some details. You can’t place the blame on people who don’t break the law. You want to hold millions of law abiding citizens accountable for the actions of a lunatic? Make them pay more money or give up their rights at the mercy of a government that has failed at every level?
Posted by Jon Ham
Member since Jun 2011
28526 posts
Posted on 3/2/18 at 1:01 pm to
All I have is a reasonable measure to save children’s lives. I guess seatbelts are logical fallacies too.
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171035 posts
Posted on 3/2/18 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

I guess seatbelts are logical fallacies too.


Seatbelts aren't a tax
Posted by Pico de Gallo
Member since Aug 2016
1894 posts
Posted on 3/2/18 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

Looks like a place for teachers to seduce their students


I wonder what it costs.
Posted by Packer
IE, California
Member since May 2017
7785 posts
Posted on 3/2/18 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

I wonder what it costs.



LINK

quote:

The 8-by-8-foot classroom shelters cost about $30,000, Newsweek reported. A company spokesman told the outlet that the price depended on the shelter’s size, but averaged to cost about $1,000 for every child that can fit inside.


Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
43318 posts
Posted on 3/2/18 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

All I have is a reasonable measure


When are you going to propose your reasonable measure?
Posted by DeafJam73
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
18397 posts
Posted on 3/2/18 at 1:13 pm to
No, it’s not reasonable. Just replace the doors. Most classroom walls are cement filled cinder blocks. Unless the shooter is bringing explosives or has enough ammunition to shoot through the wall, he can’t penetrate that. Replace the door with something he can’t shoot through and, boom. Shelter.
Posted by Barbellthor
Columbia
Member since Aug 2015
8633 posts
Posted on 3/2/18 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

Bulletproof Shelters

Am very much a fan, though it's sad that's where we are now.

quote:

Would you prefer these in every classroom or a cop at every school?

I feel the long-term costs are less with the shelters and have a higher guarantee of safety--cops could get shot, be overrun, miss and hit the wrong students, slow response time, etc. without having to pay multiple officers every day to post up.

But if I could choose both, I go with both, obviously.
Posted by Jon Ham
Member since Jun 2011
28526 posts
Posted on 3/2/18 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

No, it’s not reasonable. Just replace the doors.


If that would be equally as effective at a lower cost then of course let’s go with that.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram