Started By
Message

re: Official Thread: Missing Malaysia Airlines Flight 370

Posted on 3/19/14 at 11:26 am to
Posted by LSUJuice
Back in Houston
Member since Apr 2004
18048 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 11:26 am to
Nobody on that list surprises me, although I would think Israel would be right up there with them.
Posted by au21tigers
Thursday
Member since Nov 2009
12548 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 11:28 am to
Any new info past the simulator files being deleted?
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
69997 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 11:29 am to
True
Posted by EA6B
TX
Member since Dec 2012
14754 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 11:29 am to
quote:

The actual quote I heard yesterday was they have the best air defenses in the world. Can't remember if it was FAA or US military that said that. Either way their defenses must be pretty damn good to say that.


Corruption is rampant both within and outside of the military in China and other border countries in the area. If this hijacking was well planed maybe the radar operators on that particular night were simply been paid off in advance to look the other way.
Posted by JAXTiger16
TBD
Member since Apr 2013
2508 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 11:30 am to
quote:

In the U.S. the last time I checked there was no requirement for civilian aircraft to have a transponder or even a radio if flying VFR and not in controlled airspace, don't know about other countries.


Entering into and out of the ADIZ, you are required mode C. All aircraft that fly above 10k are required to be equipped and have transponder turned on. Usually, flying VFR you would squawk 1200. (I'm sure you knew the code for that).

LINK
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
69997 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 11:31 am to
quote:

irrelevant, there are multiple aircraft from multiple airlines


How many planes flew that route that night?
Posted by EA6B
TX
Member since Dec 2012
14754 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 11:32 am to
quote:

But since all coastal areas are ADIZ zones that is moot.



Yep, I forgot about the ADZ!
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
74172 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 11:33 am to
quote:

LINK


that link is from yesterday

today's link



different link from Austrailia

Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
69997 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 11:34 am to
quote:

Corruption is rampant both within and outside of the military in China and other border countries in the area. If this hijacking was well planed maybe the radar operators on that particular night were simply been paid off in advance to look the other way.


Increasing the entire conspiracy even more? And still no chatter intercepted before or after per intel sources.
Posted by JAXTiger16
TBD
Member since Apr 2013
2508 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 11:38 am to
Agreed

The more people you let in, the greater chance of people talking. Plus that's a lot of people you have to pay off and find in the first place. That radar operator is probably just a 25 yr old kid like me. Plus you don't know who's working the shifts or what radars would detect you.
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
74172 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 11:40 am to
quote:

Usually, flying VFR you would squawk 1200


quote:

The following areas require the operation of a Mode C transponder:

Operations within Class A, Class B, and Class C airspace.
Operations within 30 nautical miles of the primary airport within Class B airspace from the surface to 10,000 feet msl (see airports listed below).
Operations above the ceiling and within the lateral boundaries of Class B and C airspace.
Operations above 10,000 feet msl in the contiguous 48 states, excluding the airspace at and below 2,500 feet agl.
The AIM states in Section 4-1-19(a)(3) that for airborne operations in Class G airspace, the transponder should be operating unless otherwise requested by ATC.


quote:

According to 14 CFR 99.13, no person may operate an aircraft into or out of the United States, or into, within, or across an ADIZ designated in subpart B unless operating a transponder with Mode C. Certain exemptions might apply to aircraft that were not originally certified with an engine-driven electrical system; see 99.13(d).


quote:

Squawk Codes

1200 Visual Flight Rules (VFR)
7500 Hijack
7600 Communications failure
7700 emergency
7777 military intercept code


From AOPA
This post was edited on 3/19/14 at 11:42 am
Posted by ninthward
Boston, MA
Member since May 2007
22694 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 11:43 am to
quote:

The more people you let in, the greater chance of people talking. Plus that's a lot of people you have to pay off and find in the first place. That radar operator is probably just a 25 yr old kid like me. Plus you don't know who's working the shifts or what radars would detect you.
,,and this is why we know exactly what happened on 9/11
Posted by MountainTiger
The foot of Mt. Belzoni
Member since Dec 2008
14951 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 11:43 am to
quote:

Yeah, it may be more common there than most places. It was the only time it's ever happened to me. We were wobbling a good bit coming down and then when we were 20 feet or so above the runway, the engines throttled back up and we took off again. Crazy.

I fly in and out of Front Range airports pretty often and while I've never experienced a go around here, I can believe that they're not that uncommon. Summer days can be quite hot and dry. That along with the elevation and mountain-induced turbulence all combine to narrow the operating envelope, especially during landing. Like Napoleon said, airspeed, rate of descent, angle of attack all have to line up just right and if there's any doubt, going around is your best option.
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
69997 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 11:44 am to
I'm just not a huge conspiracy theorist type. I hope they find the plane and the recorders just to find out that this plan wasn't some brilliant conspiracy.

ETA: not that I believe it's possible but can a 777 catch up to and find another commercial aircraft if their own transponder is off? I guess what I am asking is...they would only be relying on visual contact?
This post was edited on 3/19/14 at 11:48 am
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
74172 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 11:54 am to
Whoa "the singing astronaut" is on CNN saying that Nasa and some private company just releases twenty eight shoe boxed sized satellites that will take pictures every second (5 miles per second) will give highly accurate and fast changing images of earth. Still not fully operational. Will be able to used to find lost planes, spot wildfires, etc...
story link
This post was edited on 3/19/14 at 11:55 am
Posted by JAXTiger16
TBD
Member since Apr 2013
2508 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 11:56 am to
quote:

ETA: not that I believe it's possible but can a 777 catch up to and find another commercial aircraft if their own transponder is off? I guess what I am asking is...they would only be relying on visual contact?


I'm not 100% sure if they have an IFF receiver onboard. If they do then they can find another aircraft using that but still have to speed up to catch up which is hard.

If they don't, they can use TCAS to find another aircraft.

If they turned TCAS off, then it's all visual.
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
69997 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

If they don't, they can use TCAS to find another aircraft.


And if they use it the other plane would see them right? Making a rendezvous with another plane even less likely... Unless that pilot was in on it
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
74172 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 12:03 pm to


Simple map based off of compiled information.

Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
74172 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

If they don't, they can use TCAS to find another aircraft.

If they turned TCAS off, then it's all visual.



TCAS is independent of the transponder, so I think you can use it without a transponder on.

Posted by JAXTiger16
TBD
Member since Apr 2013
2508 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

And if they use it the other plane would see them right? Making a rendezvous with another plane even less likely... Unless that pilot was in on it


Yes, TCAS is an active system which means if it's on you will b seen also. But don't quote me on this, I think you can only see in front and to the sides, not behind you.

And yes, TCAS is completely independent.
Jump to page
Page First 299 300 301 302 303 ... 375
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 301 of 375Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram