- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Official Thread: Missing Malaysia Airlines Flight 370
Posted on 3/14/14 at 11:59 pm to PsychTiger
Posted on 3/14/14 at 11:59 pm to PsychTiger
quote:
this the first post on page 200?
Posted on 3/14/14 at 11:59 pm to Mizzoufan26
quote:
They mentioned lithium on fox news. Doesn't seem like that would be too special though
Unless you need a neutron initiator for a early generation fission bomb. The exact type of nuke a terrorist group would try to build, but there are much easier ways to get it.
Posted on 3/15/14 at 12:01 am to Da Sheik
So, the most valuable thing on the plane that anyone would want would be...what?
Posted on 3/15/14 at 12:01 am to wasteland
I only missed by two posts. That's much closer than the Malaysian authorities would have been.
Posted on 3/15/14 at 12:01 am to beejon
I can see this a hijacking gone awry and crashing in the process, but I don't buy that they landed this somewhere. This thing isn't a helicopter that can be landed anywhere.
1. It needs a long runway
2. It couldn't be landed at a major airport and hidden let alone avoid being seen or heard by some random person while on approach
3. A government would notice terrorists building a giant runway on some deserted island
1. It needs a long runway
2. It couldn't be landed at a major airport and hidden let alone avoid being seen or heard by some random person while on approach
3. A government would notice terrorists building a giant runway on some deserted island
Posted on 3/15/14 at 12:03 am to beejon
quote:
So, the most valuable thing on the plane that anyone would want would be...what?
Virgins
Posted on 3/15/14 at 12:03 am to PsychTiger
Only thing about that is we assume this would have had to have been planned for months...perhaps years. How could they have known that 20 experts on cloaking would be on that plane far enough in advance to set it all in motion? I guess it is plausible that these bookings were made months ago and the terrorists were ready but just waiting for the right opportunity. But then you are faced with the question "How could they have insured that this particular pilot would fly that particular plane with those 20 on board?"
Posted on 3/15/14 at 12:03 am to ever43
There are a lot of airfields left over from WWII that could be quickly adapted from what I've read on here.
This post was edited on 3/15/14 at 12:04 am
Posted on 3/15/14 at 12:03 am to jlc05
Bingo.
Somebody in the USN is very interested in that plane. The question is why.
quote:
Could this particular plane have been transporting very valuable cargo?
Somebody in the USN is very interested in that plane. The question is why.
Posted on 3/15/14 at 12:04 am to NYNolaguy1
quote:
Somebody in the USN is very interested in that plane. The question is why.
USN?
Posted on 3/15/14 at 12:05 am to 3HourTour
where do you get fuel for this? rouge state
where do you hide this plane? rouge state
why do you want such long range? when you have a nuke on board being able to have the fuel to hit secondary targets if the first is somehow not optimum
where do you hide this plane? rouge state
why do you want such long range? when you have a nuke on board being able to have the fuel to hit secondary targets if the first is somehow not optimum
Posted on 3/15/14 at 12:05 am to PsychTiger
I'm still going with hole in plane causing slow cabin depressurization. pilot tried to turn back, passed out and autopilot flew it till gas ran out. Bottom of the Indian ocean now. It's the only thing that makes sense. Pilots were reported mumbling, remember......
Posted on 3/15/14 at 12:06 am to ever43
quote:
1. It needs a long runway 2. It couldn't be landed at a major airport and hidden let alone avoid being seen or heard by some random person while on approach 3. A government would notice terrorists building a giant runway on some deserted island
Giant runway? It can be landed in 4500 feet, if unloaded of cargo an passengers it could get wheels off the ground in the same distance then hold it close to the ground or ocean while building enough air speed for climb out..
There are hundreds of suitable runways many abandoned in range of the plane. This has all been covered in the last 200 pages!
This post was edited on 3/15/14 at 12:07 am
Posted on 3/15/14 at 12:07 am to EA6B
Posted on 3/15/14 at 12:07 am to biscuitsngravy
quote:
I'm still going with hole in plane causing slow cabin depressurization. pilot tried to turn back, passed out and autopilot flew it till gas ran out. Bottom of the Indian ocean now. It's the only thing that makes sense. Pilots were reported mumbling, remember......
So govt officials say hijacking is conclusive and you're still going with that?
Posted on 3/15/14 at 12:08 am to EA6B
quote:
It can be landed in 4500 feet, if unloaded of cargo an passengers it could get wheels off the ground in the same distance then hold it close to the ground or ocean while building enough air speed for climb out..
could it be hidden, taken apart and out on a boat
Posted on 3/15/14 at 12:08 am to biscuitsngravy
quote:
Pilots were reported mumbling, remember......
Wait.... What?
Posted on 3/15/14 at 12:08 am to biscuitsngravy
quote:
I'm still going with hole in plane causing slow cabin depressurization. pilot tried to turn back, passed out and autopilot flew it till gas ran out. Bottom of the Indian ocean now. It's the only thing that makes sense. Pilots were reported mumbling, remember......
But that doesn't explain the systematic shutdown of the systems, starting with the transponder.
Popular
Back to top


1







