- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Notre Dame cathedral is burning down
Posted on 4/15/19 at 9:32 pm to ell_13
Posted on 4/15/19 at 9:32 pm to ell_13
quote:
There’s a good chance workers know what happened and told the authorities. Pretty straight forward.
When you're someone who actively roots for the Muslims or leftist groups to be responsible, hopefully leading to war so they can use their big guns, common sense goes out the window.
Given the scaffolding and where the fire started, it was obvious to anyone with a half-functioning brain that this was an accidental blaze caused by the renovation crews. Unfortunately, the PoliBoard attitude is like a fricking virus and uses every opportunity to push forward their agenda and narrative.
4
Posted on 4/15/19 at 9:33 pm to Scruffy
quote:
Vandalism of French churches, which has been increasingly common,
From all of the articles recently posted about it almost all of the vandalism seems to be thefts and stuff that’s kids would do.
Posted on 4/15/19 at 9:34 pm to mmmmmbeeer
This is how great conspiracies are born. Ignore all logic and push forward with the best story.
Posted on 4/15/19 at 9:38 pm to mmmmmbeeer
quote:I don’t subscribe to this strawman. I simply think people want to blame something other than the least interesting cause. It’s the same “want” that drives people to clickbait headlines.
When you're someone who actively roots for the Muslims or leftist groups to be responsible, hopefully leading to war so they can use their big guns
quote:The scaffolding covered a third of the roof. I don’t think it was so obvious in the moments, even hours, after it was initially reported. Speculation early is fine. My post was only in regard to authorities coming out and saying foul play isn’t involved. It’s that statement that should lead people to the conclusion that workers were interviewed and explained the accident.
Given the scaffolding and where the fire started, it was obvious to anyone with a half-functioning brain that this was an accidental blaze caused by the renovation crews.
Posted on 4/15/19 at 9:40 pm to mmmmmbeeer
quote:
Given the scaffolding and where the fire started, it was obvious to anyone with a half-functioning brain that this was an accidental blaze caused by the renovation crews. Unfortunately, the PoliBoard attitude is like a fricking virus and uses every opportunity to push forward their agenda and narrative.
This is some of the dumbest shite I’ve ever read on this site.
Posted on 4/15/19 at 9:41 pm to slackster
quote:I'm keeping an open mind, which INCLUDES terrorism during Holy Week, in a country where many churches have been damaged in the past months.
Like I said, you are like a typical conspiracy theorists - the only facts that you'll accept are the ones you like.
And, I guess, if the DOJ wouldn't prosecute Clinton, the it is no surprise that a French prosecutor opts out of investigating terrorism before the building has been cooled down enough to search.
So Slackster's a prog? Wouldn't surprise me.
Posted on 4/15/19 at 9:43 pm to ell_13
quote:
. My post was only in regard to authorities coming out and saying foul play isn’t involved. It’s that statement that should lead people to the conclusion that workers were interviewed and explained the accident.
frick that. Who cares?
You still investigate and make a determination as to the authenticity or validity of their statement. You don’t declare it to be fact while the fricker is still on fire.
lmao, idiots/assholes
Posted on 4/15/19 at 9:43 pm to BRgetthenet
quote:
This is some of the dumbest shite I’ve ever read on this site.
Says a poliboard retard.
Posted on 4/15/19 at 9:44 pm to mmmmmbeeer
[quote] Says a poliboard retard[/quote
I guess. It doesn’t change the inanity your logic.
I guess. It doesn’t change the inanity your logic.
Posted on 4/15/19 at 9:46 pm to fillmoregandt
quote:
I don’t see how they can reach such a definitive conclusion so quickly with the surge of recent church vandalism/arsons in the area in recent weeks
I think this is why there is a complete mistrust of information being put out by government/press outlets
Posted on 4/15/19 at 9:47 pm to BRgetthenet
If it would have had signatures of a terrorist attack you would be saying case closed it’s terrorist and complaining that it has been officially announced as terrorism.
Posted on 4/15/19 at 9:48 pm to slackster
quote:
I'd imagine they've got some information we don't?
Mass was being celebrated when the alarms started. People were everywhere. Surely witnesses exist, perhaps workers themselves.
Then why wouldn't they include that info during the original statement?
Posted on 4/15/19 at 9:52 pm to Dizz
Some idiots on page one of this thread think that the church fire is in Indiana. One even asks if touchdown Jesus went up in smoke. 
Posted on 4/15/19 at 9:53 pm to BRgetthenet
quote:Why not? If multiple witnesses claim the same thing (accident) from multiple areas (which is the assumption), what’s wrong with saying the investigation, right now, will focus on that evidence? On top of that, no groups are claiming this, no suicides involved, and multiple reports confirming it started as a result of the renovation work.
You don’t declare it to be fact while the fricker is still on fire.
Posted on 4/15/19 at 9:54 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
Then why wouldn't they include that info during the original statement?
I'm not sure. I've read it paraphrased on multiple sites. Some say the preliminary indications were it was an accident. Some specifically say they ruled out arson and terrorism.
Hell, Fox says they ruled it out "for now", whatever that means.
Posted on 4/15/19 at 9:54 pm to ell_13
To be fair, no one has claimed responsibility for the other church burnings/vandalizing in France either
Posted on 4/15/19 at 9:56 pm to Buckeye Jeaux
quote:
And, I guess, if the DOJ wouldn't prosecute Clinton, the it is no surprise that a French prosecutor opts out of investigating terrorism before the building has been cooled down enough to search.
quote:
So Slackster's a prog? Wouldn't surprise me.
Hell no, but before I found Tigerdroppings, I didn't even know embarrassing conservatives existed.
Posted on 4/15/19 at 9:56 pm to slackster
quote:
I'm not sure. I've read it paraphrased on multiple sites. Some say the preliminary indications were it was an accident. Some specifically say they ruled out arson and terrorism.
Hell, Fox says they ruled it out "for now", whatever that means.
That's exactly why people don't put a whole lot of faith into what they're being told. If it's not a criminal investigation, then you generally tell people details about why you ruled certain things out.
Posted on 4/15/19 at 9:57 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
To be fair, no one has claimed responsibility for the other church burnings/vandalizing in France either
Not all of them. Some supposedly are implied by their graffitti messages.
Posted on 4/15/19 at 9:59 pm to mmmmmbeeer
quote:Gotta love that lefty false intellectual assuredness.
it was obvious to anyone with a half-functioning brain that this was an accidental blaze
Is it "obvious?" Were you there? If it's so obvious, why haven't they said that this is definitely what it was?
Maybe because it's not obvious.
Page 44 of 52
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News