Started By
Message

re: Newly discovered dinosaur weighed 65 tons

Posted on 9/4/14 at 9:46 am to
Posted by Bleeding purple
Athens, Texas
Member since Sep 2007
25348 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 9:46 am to
reptile that was a primarily a walker so I would assume something like gator maybe darker.
Posted by Phat Phil
Krispy Kreme
Member since May 2010
7560 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 9:47 am to
too big to fit Noah's ark
Posted by USMCTiger03
Member since Sep 2007
71176 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 9:48 am to
Sounds pretty weird:
quote:

But its enormous bulk also had a downside. Based on the width and strength of its skeleton, toppling over would likely spell death for such a heavy animal. “If you look at its really big ribs, there's no way they're going to withstand 65 tons of weight on top of them,” he said. “It would have been a catastrophic event in the life of a Dreadnoughtus if it fell over.”

However, it probably didn't do much walking around since its 37-foot-long neck could already provide access to a wide bounty of vegetation.
Posted by The Third Leg
Idiot Out Wandering Around
Member since May 2014
12553 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 9:48 am to
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
33186 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 9:48 am to
Maybe it was a Brachiosaurus with Gigantisism
Posted by Clyde Tipton
Planet Earth
Member since Dec 2007
40799 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 9:49 am to
quote:

Y'all think dinosaurs would have been good table fare?


There was a thing about a wooly mammoth they found frozen in Siberia a few years ago. They got hair and DNA samples, and they researchers said they couldn't resist tasting/eating a small amount of meat.
Posted by htownjeep
Republic of Texas
Member since Jun 2005
7798 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 9:49 am to
quote:

No wonder Pangea broke apart.

Too soon.
Posted by Sir Drinksalot
Member since Aug 2005
16868 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 9:50 am to
What! So it just laid there and ate!

This makes no sense.
Posted by When in Rome
Telegraph Road
Member since Jan 2011
36215 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 9:50 am to



dat tibia
This post was edited on 9/4/14 at 9:51 am
Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
103979 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 9:53 am to
quote:

What! So it just laid there and ate!

This makes no sense.


Nah, it just didn't have to do too much walking around. Slow grazing, like that person in the buffet line with tennis balls on the bottom of their walker.
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
33186 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 9:55 am to
I say these scientists are either

A. Full of shite

B. Are wrong about this animal


A gigantic dinosaur that could barely walk and died if it fell over seems not real to me
Posted by DVA Tailgater
Bunkie
Member since Jan 2011
3461 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 9:55 am to


Where does Kate Upton come in on this chart?
This post was edited on 9/4/14 at 9:56 am
Posted by USMCTiger03
Member since Sep 2007
71176 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 9:57 am to
I'm confused:
quote:

Typically these long-necked, long-tailed dinosaurs (called sauropods) have tiny skulls, so those bones tend not to survive. For instance, Dreadnought's was probably about the size of a horse's head.

This 65 ton beast had a head the size of a horse's??
This post was edited on 9/4/14 at 9:58 am
Posted by GEAUXT
Member since Nov 2007
30505 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 9:59 am to
the blue whale laughs at 65 tons
Posted by When in Rome
Telegraph Road
Member since Jan 2011
36215 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 9:59 am to
Well this dinosaur died due to getting caught in quick sand. Which is why it was preserved so well. And because it is so well-preserved, they have determined the size/weight. Due to the size it doesn't seem like a stretch to assume that it didn't move around that much.
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
33186 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 10:01 am to
What they're describing just makes no sense from a evolutionary stand point. What is the advantage of being built so that you can barely move?
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
52548 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 10:01 am to
they couldn't have come up with a better name than dreadnuts?
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
74167 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 10:02 am to
Posted by BeaverPRO
Tampa
Member since Aug 2009
16265 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 10:02 am to
quote:

Y'all think dinosaurs would have been good table fare?

only in sushi roll style
Posted by When in Rome
Telegraph Road
Member since Jan 2011
36215 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 10:04 am to
From an evolutionary standpoint? Its size allowed it to easily ward off predators and it could survive on vegetation with it's 37 ft long neck. Genetic mutations cause the size, and its size then allows it to survive.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram