Started By
Message

re: Newly discovered dinosaur weighed 65 tons

Posted on 9/4/14 at 10:56 am to
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 10:56 am to
Pectus, settle an argument. Can you crush a diamond with a hammer? TIA
Posted by DrSteveBrule
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2009
12484 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 10:56 am to
It probably died off for that reason. Not enough food to go around. Like the land version of a megalodon
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
59069 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 10:58 am to
dont let the big rolling rocks and swinging pendulum blades get you when you do
Posted by TejasHorn
High Plains Driftin'
Member since Mar 2007
11590 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 10:58 am to
quote:

Newly discovered dinosaur weighed 65 tons


like anyone could even know that

Posted by forksup
Member since Dec 2013
8817 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 10:58 am to
quote:

Gators?


I can see those anytime. I want to see a Trex. A Stegosaurus. A triceratops. :dreaming:
Posted by Happygilmore
Happy Place
Member since Mar 2009
1835 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 10:58 am to
not you pec

if this had to move so slow because of its size, how in the world would it have a weaponized tail? if he could swing it fast enough to be a weapon, than he wasnt that slow moving, or if he was it would cause him to fall over, invoking death.

i have a hard time believing some of the things these people come up with as explanations.
Posted by link
Member since Feb 2009
19945 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 10:58 am to
maybe if it was a diamond hammer and you were thor
Posted by Pectus
Internet
Member since Apr 2010
67302 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 10:59 am to
quote:

Can you crush a diamond with a hammer? TIA



Of course.

Just because it's the hardest mineral doesn't mean it can be broken. I think they can break if you drop them. Being the hardest mineral means that you have very strong bonds on the molecular scale. After all, how do you think they cut facets diamonds?

And diamond itself isn't "forever". It's unstable at Earth's surface. Given a few millenia, and that diamond will be graphite.
Posted by RedRifle
Austin/NO
Member since Dec 2013
8334 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 11:03 am to
Posted by Pectus
Internet
Member since Apr 2010
67302 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 11:03 am to
There are people that come up with some fantastical theories about how dinosaurs lived...they are working theories that get the most press, but really aren't feasible.

Doesn't mean there's not evidence of something...the interpretation just may be too grand.

Some scientists think the large dinosaurs had "gigantothermy" it's cold-blooded with being really big so it's easy to thermo regulate. Like a bucket of water in the Sun stays cool for along time because there's so much water...then over time gets warm. As night approaches it stays warm because there's so much water in it. That's gigantothermy.
Posted by SmellslikeKevinBacon
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2012
6210 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 11:11 am to
This is obviously fake. Everyone knows the earth is only 6000 years old.
Posted by Bleeding purple
Athens, Texas
Member since Sep 2007
25348 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 11:12 am to
quote:

Some scientists think the large dinosaurs had "gigantothermy" it's cold-blooded with being really big so it's easy to thermo regulate. Like a bucket of water in the Sun stays cool for along time because there's so much water...then over time gets warm. As night approaches it stays warm because there's so much water in it. That's gigantothermy.



see my post above about advantages of size
Posted by OneMoreTime
Florida Gulf Coast Fan
Member since Dec 2008
61865 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 11:34 am to
quote:

And diamond itself isn't "forever". It's unstable at Earth's surface. Given a few millenia, and that diamond will be graphite.
So can I give my gf some graphite jewelry and be good to go?
Posted by LSUTygerFan
Homerun Village
Member since Jun 2008
33232 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 11:37 am to
he was just big boned
Posted by Btrtigerfan
Disgruntled employee
Member since Dec 2007
23957 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 11:47 am to

Dreadnoughtus
This post was edited on 9/4/14 at 12:02 pm
Posted by UpToPar
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
22966 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 11:58 am to
It's counter intuitive to think that evolution allowed an animal to grow to such a size that it died if it fell over.
Posted by Pectus
Internet
Member since Apr 2010
67302 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 11:58 am to
quote:

So can I give my gf some graphite jewelry and be good to go?



It's not forever either. It'd flake so much it would slide right off her finger.
Posted by Pectus
Internet
Member since Apr 2010
67302 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 11:59 am to
All these ideas have been around for decades.
Posted by Dick Leverage
In The HizHouse
Member since Nov 2013
9000 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 11:59 am to
I watched a show the other day that addressed your question. It asserted that a herd of 30 ton Sauropods would require about one acre per Sauropod, per day.
Posted by USMCTiger03
Member since Sep 2007
71176 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 1:30 pm to
Exactly. There are a lot of odd conclusions here.

When did paleontologists become so infallible?
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram