Started By
Message

re: New Utah law removes soft drinks from SNAP-eligible purchases

Posted on 12/31/25 at 3:15 am to
Posted by Bama and Beer
Baldwin Co, AL
Member since Oct 2010
85509 posts
Posted on 12/31/25 at 3:15 am to
All states should follow this
Posted by Beer did clam
BatonRouge where CATS are RATZ
Member since Oct 2009
1605 posts
Posted on 12/31/25 at 3:25 am to
Louisiana starts the same restrictions
In February
Posted by CaptainsWafer
TD Platinum Member
Member since Feb 2006
59311 posts
Posted on 12/31/25 at 5:58 am to
quote:

It’s a start, the govt should hire a nutritionist and based on healthy and unprocessed foods a comprehensive list of eligible items should be established


They should hire a dietitian. Any buffoon can be a nutritionist, a dietitian has to be licensed and many have masters degrees.
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
34488 posts
Posted on 12/31/25 at 5:59 am to
quote:

Doesn’t the Mormon church own a bunch of stock in Coca Cola?


Always been the rumor I've heard, but strangely they've never let me look at their stock holdings .
Posted by TaderSalad
mudbug territory
Member since Jul 2014
26438 posts
Posted on 12/31/25 at 6:02 am to
quote:

Good. They should be drinking water.



And eating rice, beans, and spam. That's all that should be allowed. Also, should have an EBT aisle of only that.
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
34488 posts
Posted on 12/31/25 at 6:43 am to
quote:

And eating rice, beans, and spam. That's all that should be allowed. Also, should have an EBT aisle of only that.


I'd be ok with fresh fruits and vegetables on the list. Many are remarkably inexpensive.
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
31525 posts
Posted on 12/31/25 at 6:49 am to
quote:

Absolutely insane America is okay with this

quote:
Nationwide average is around 12%.



I mean poor people do exist
Posted by Tarps99
Lafourche Parish
Member since Apr 2017
12646 posts
Posted on 12/31/25 at 7:02 am to
quote:

It’s a start, the govt should hire a nutritionist and based on healthy and unprocessed foods a comprehensive list of eligible items should be established


It is easy just allow raw products to be purchased.

Raw meats and fish; staples like flour, sugar, corn meal, spices, herbs, cooking oils, bread, etc.; raw fruits and vegetables frozen, refrigerated, or in cans can be pre cut, but not heavily processed or turned into something else; dairy products like milk, cheese, butter, margarine, etc.; and canned goods or shelf stable goods used for cooking like tomato sauce, pasta, broths, tuna fish, etc.


What is not on the list, any frozen meals, pizza, chips, sodas, water, flavored water, candy, quick meals, cookies, sugary snacks, and anything else identifiable as junk food.


Also, items should have a food stamp limit. Items purchased with food stamps cannot exceed a certain amount by category, and the difference is paid by the food stamp user. Like a meat purchase might include the first 10 dollars.

That way you stop people who use food stamps for bulk purchases for nefarious purposes like reselling food cooked with food stamps.


I also posted a few weeks ago instead of going to a regular store for purchases why not create a food stamps store like an Alabama ABC store that just sells staples and none of the other junk food items not purchase able with food stamps.


You can maybe work with food banks to coordinate this and merge the donation power of a food bank with a retail operation for food stamp purchases.
Posted by SpotCheckBilly
Member since May 2020
8507 posts
Posted on 12/31/25 at 7:17 am to
quote:

The last time a thread like this was started, a bunch of people came into the thread to claim it is “big govt” and “anti-freedom” to support restrictions like this. Most of these posters were from NOLA, north BR, Shreveport, etc.


Since it is the government's (our) money that they are spending, the government (we) have every right to place restrictions on how it should be spent.

This should be done nationwide. Nothing wrong with drinking water, and it's better for you. Do junk food next.
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86142 posts
Posted on 12/31/25 at 7:22 am to
quote:

The last time a thread like this was started, a bunch of people came into the thread to claim it is “big govt” and “anti-freedom” to support restrictions like this. Most of these posters were from NOLA, north BR, Shreveport, etc.


can you link it?

because I think you are conflating 2 different topics
Posted by ponyman
Member since Nov 2019
503 posts
Posted on 12/31/25 at 7:35 am to
Meat, poultry, fish, eggs, fruits, vegetables. There, that should cover about 95% of SNAP.
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
34488 posts
Posted on 12/31/25 at 8:10 am to
quote:

It is easy just allow raw products to be purchased.

Raw meats and fish; staples like flour, sugar, corn meal, spices, herbs, cooking oils, bread, etc.; raw fruits and vegetables frozen, refrigerated, or in cans can be pre cut, but not heavily processed or turned into something else; dairy products like milk, cheese, butter, margarine, etc.; and canned goods or shelf stable goods used for cooking like tomato sauce, pasta, broths, tuna fish, etc.


While I agree with what your getting at here, what about peanut butter? Higley processed, but relatively inexpensive while nutrient and protein dense. It's also good for diabetes management.

Thoughts?
This post was edited on 12/31/25 at 8:11 am
Posted by Tarps99
Lafourche Parish
Member since Apr 2017
12646 posts
Posted on 12/31/25 at 10:34 am to
quote:

While I agree with what your getting at here, what about peanut butter? Higley processed, but relatively inexpensive while nutrient and protein dense. It's also good for diabetes management.

Thoughts?


Good point. Probably so. I would consider it a staple since you can use peanut butter to also cook. Not everything is on the food naughty list.

I wonder if big food would have a fit if you threw in a requirement that you had to buy a store brand or generic items instead of name brand items.
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
36978 posts
Posted on 12/31/25 at 10:41 am to
quote:

The last time a thread like this was started, a bunch of people came into the thread to claim it is “big govt” and “anti-freedom” to support restrictions like this. Most of these posters were from NOLA, north BR, Shreveport, etc.




Cuz of course there were. Do these people know they can buy whatever they want with their own money, and the restrictions are attached to what they can buy with my money? And it's intended to help ensure we pay for less of their needs (namely: healthcare) with my money?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram