Started By
Message

re: New details emerge on the LSP kiddie porn arrest

Posted on 2/18/20 at 3:45 pm to
Posted by Mr Clean
New Iberia
Member since Aug 2006
49290 posts
Posted on 2/18/20 at 3:45 pm to
That’s SPEEDY
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68277 posts
Posted on 2/18/20 at 6:52 pm to
Producing means he was filming these acts? If so, he needs the death penalty if found guilty.
Posted by magildachunks
Member since Oct 2006
32482 posts
Posted on 2/18/20 at 7:01 pm to
Originally read this as the LPS pedo caae.

Livingston Parish Sheriff.



LEO's are fricked up.


And spare me the "one bad apple" bullshite.


Time to do a deep cleansing.
Posted by Ricardo
Member since Sep 2016
4889 posts
Posted on 2/18/20 at 7:05 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/14/20 at 8:49 pm
Posted by BruceJender
Houston
Member since Dec 2016
620 posts
Posted on 2/18/20 at 7:14 pm to
Where are you getting 100k from? I just looked up average salary and it was like 70k at the highest.
Posted by nola000
Lacombe, LA
Member since Dec 2014
13139 posts
Posted on 2/18/20 at 7:17 pm to
quote:

And idiots like this throw it all away and give everyone in law enforcement a bad reputation.
Terrible.



THIS.

This is why I'm so hard on law enforcement and am so often accused of being a police hater. It's just the opposite. I think it's a very serious job that requires very serious people. With great power comes the expectation of great responsibility. And I think we can all agree that law enforcement in this country have great power. Too much, in fact. Which makes it all that more important that we have incredible people in those positions that get paid accordingly. Unfortunately, all too often, a double-digit IQ and a high school diploma is all that's required.
Posted by Keltic Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2006
19303 posts
Posted on 2/18/20 at 7:18 pm to
With the FBI involved, I presume this is a Federal crime & he will end p in a Fed.prison? Going to a rough prison sentence. Good.
Posted by nola000
Lacombe, LA
Member since Dec 2014
13139 posts
Posted on 2/18/20 at 7:26 pm to
quote:

Merely possessing kiddie porn is one thing and something you could have a chance of arguing you were framed or negotiating for the best possible plea deal.

But producing and distributing? Especially under 13 years old? That is another thing entirely



For sure.

I think it's important that people separate the two. You're talking about two completely different levels of what the frickery.

The first crime, while weird and gross, doesn't actually produce a victim and is likely done from your own home or personal devices but the other requires you to actually produce a victim and engage on a whole nother level. Not only is it weird and gross but it's ballsy and likely involves kidnapping. That's somebody that's a clear danger to society.
Posted by The Midnight Rider
Where the River Empties
Member since May 2015
1576 posts
Posted on 2/18/20 at 8:14 pm to
quote:

The first crime, while weird and gross, doesn't actually produce a victim

Oh sure, except for just, y'know, THE KIDS IN THE PORN.
Posted by lsuwontonwrap
Member since Aug 2012
34147 posts
Posted on 2/18/20 at 8:21 pm to
hang him high
Posted by theenemy
Member since Oct 2006
13078 posts
Posted on 2/18/20 at 8:23 pm to
quote:

Producing means he was filming these acts? If so, he needs the death penalty if found guilty.


Not necessarily.

Not 100% sure but I believe uploading images whether you filmed them or received them from someone else is considered producing.

Posted by Jester
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
34320 posts
Posted on 2/18/20 at 8:32 pm to
quote:

Unless you think he planted evidence on everyone he arrested, I don't really see the connection.


Defense attorneys won't. He's officially an unreliable witness.
Posted by nola000
Lacombe, LA
Member since Dec 2014
13139 posts
Posted on 2/18/20 at 9:04 pm to
quote:

Oh sure, except for just, y'know, THE KIDS IN THE PORN


Reading be hard.

I'm talking about in relation to a person who is charged with possession and not Distributing and producing. The person possessing doesn't create a victim. Only the person that produces.

Posted by The Midnight Rider
Where the River Empties
Member since May 2015
1576 posts
Posted on 2/18/20 at 11:51 pm to
Dude. I know exactly what you’re TRYING to say, but logic be hard for some people. Possession of child pornography is still a crime with a victim, bc the CHILD IS STILL BEING EXPLOITED AND USED FOR PORNOGRAPHY - pornography that exists SOLELY for the pieces of shyte like this guy that consume it. There’s still a victim. Attempting to distance or disconnect the victim from the crime of even “just possession” is such a strange and weird stance to take.

People like this guy that exist create the market that creates the victims. His actions are literally creating victims. It’s a causal chain.
This post was edited on 2/18/20 at 11:53 pm
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76336 posts
Posted on 2/18/20 at 11:54 pm to
He should kill himself.
Posted by tiger09
Houston, TX
Member since Jan 2015
220 posts
Posted on 2/19/20 at 1:04 am to
quote:

Where are you getting 100k from


I assumed he was talking about the ones that really hustle and take every extra duty assignment they can get.

Ex: when you see LSP working construction, LSU games, Saints games, DA speed trap programs, etc. those are often extra duty assignments for which they earn a very respectable $/hr that is in addition to their state salary.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98854 posts
Posted on 2/19/20 at 2:43 am to
quote:

I’ll never understand why the mind of a pedo isn't scattered all over the wall.


There is no cure or rehabilitation.

They should be removed from the gene pool.

Permanently.
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
34681 posts
Posted on 2/19/20 at 5:22 am to
quote:

And idiots like this throw it all away and give everyone in law enforcement a bad reputation.


Plenty of idiots still out there to maintain that well-earned reputation.
Posted by nola000
Lacombe, LA
Member since Dec 2014
13139 posts
Posted on 2/19/20 at 6:26 am to
quote:

Dude. I know exactly what you’re TRYING to say, but logic be hard for some people. Possession of child pornography is still a crime with a victim, bc the CHILD IS STILL BEING EXPLOITED AND USED FOR PORNOGRAPHY - pornography that exists SOLELY for the pieces of shyte like this guy that consume it. There’s still a victim. Attempting to distance or disconnect the victim from the crime of even “just possession” is such a strange and weird stance to take.

People like this guy that exist create the market that creates the victims. His actions are literally creating victims. It’s a causal chain.


I don't necessarily disagree with you. That was exactly the point I was going to make.

I look at it like this, possessing pictures or video of a murder isnt necessarily illegal. But murder obviously is. Possessing media of the murder isnt creating a victim.

Now I agree with you that in the case of pornography it's a little different because the original illegal action that creates the victim, production of the pronography, typically is done with the express intent of creating the media for distribution and viewing. That's why possession of that media is illegal and not possession of media of other crimes taking place.

You seem to be reacting as though I'm green-lighting possession of child pronography. I'm not. I'm simply stating that production is way more serious than possession and I used the creation and interaction of an actual real-life victim as my reasoning.

It's kind of like the difference of going after drug dealers versus drug users. What's the point in going after drug users? They're just doing what comes naturally to them even if most of us disagree with them. If you really want to make a dent in the industry then you have to go after those producing. That's where the supply chain starts.
This post was edited on 2/19/20 at 6:27 am
Posted by nola000
Lacombe, LA
Member since Dec 2014
13139 posts
Posted on 2/19/20 at 6:33 am to
Ah. I think I missed addressing one of your points that you were trying to make.

quote:

bc the CHILD IS STILL BEING EXPLOITED AND USED FOR PORNOGRAPHY -


I think what you're trying to say is that the original child victim is being re-victimized each time media of them are being consumed.

Ehhh. I mean, it's not a bad argument to make but I don't know that I necessarily agree with it. The reason being is, from the viewpoint of the victim, they've only been victimized once. When the media of them was actually produced. Each time it's viewed after that, the only person aware of it is the person doing the viewing, not the victim. Now you could say that the victim's reputation is being victimized the more people view the media but I doubt that has the same impact as the original production in the mind of the victim. Plus, ignorance is bliss. I mean, if you don't know if naked pictures of you of being viewed, does it really matter? It's only a matter of embarrassment. Now that question of how many may drive you nuts but again, it's not nearly on the level of the original crime. And that's really the only point I was trying to make.
This post was edited on 2/19/20 at 6:34 am
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram