- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: New details emerge on the LSP kiddie porn arrest
Posted on 2/18/20 at 3:45 pm to TigerstuckinMS
Posted on 2/18/20 at 3:45 pm to TigerstuckinMS
That’s SPEEDY
Posted on 2/18/20 at 6:52 pm to jbgleason
Producing means he was filming these acts? If so, he needs the death penalty if found guilty.
Posted on 2/18/20 at 7:01 pm to jbgleason
Originally read this as the LPS pedo caae.
Livingston Parish Sheriff.
LEO's are fricked up.
And spare me the "one bad apple" bullshite.
Time to do a deep cleansing.
Livingston Parish Sheriff.
LEO's are fricked up.
And spare me the "one bad apple" bullshite.
Time to do a deep cleansing.
Posted on 2/18/20 at 7:05 pm to Jake88
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/14/20 at 8:49 pm
Posted on 2/18/20 at 7:14 pm to The People
Where are you getting 100k from? I just looked up average salary and it was like 70k at the highest.
Posted on 2/18/20 at 7:17 pm to The People
quote:
And idiots like this throw it all away and give everyone in law enforcement a bad reputation.
Terrible.
THIS.
This is why I'm so hard on law enforcement and am so often accused of being a police hater. It's just the opposite. I think it's a very serious job that requires very serious people. With great power comes the expectation of great responsibility. And I think we can all agree that law enforcement in this country have great power. Too much, in fact. Which makes it all that more important that we have incredible people in those positions that get paid accordingly. Unfortunately, all too often, a double-digit IQ and a high school diploma is all that's required.
Posted on 2/18/20 at 7:18 pm to BruceJender
With the FBI involved, I presume this is a Federal crime & he will end p in a Fed.prison? Going to a rough prison sentence. Good.
Posted on 2/18/20 at 7:26 pm to Sentrius
quote:
Merely possessing kiddie porn is one thing and something you could have a chance of arguing you were framed or negotiating for the best possible plea deal.
But producing and distributing? Especially under 13 years old? That is another thing entirely
For sure.
I think it's important that people separate the two. You're talking about two completely different levels of what the frickery.
The first crime, while weird and gross, doesn't actually produce a victim and is likely done from your own home or personal devices but the other requires you to actually produce a victim and engage on a whole nother level. Not only is it weird and gross but it's ballsy and likely involves kidnapping. That's somebody that's a clear danger to society.
Posted on 2/18/20 at 8:14 pm to nola000
quote:
The first crime, while weird and gross, doesn't actually produce a victim
Oh sure, except for just, y'know, THE KIDS IN THE PORN.
Posted on 2/18/20 at 8:23 pm to Jake88
quote:
Producing means he was filming these acts? If so, he needs the death penalty if found guilty.
Not necessarily.
Not 100% sure but I believe uploading images whether you filmed them or received them from someone else is considered producing.
Posted on 2/18/20 at 8:32 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
Unless you think he planted evidence on everyone he arrested, I don't really see the connection.
Defense attorneys won't. He's officially an unreliable witness.
Posted on 2/18/20 at 9:04 pm to The Midnight Rider
quote:
Oh sure, except for just, y'know, THE KIDS IN THE PORN
Reading be hard.
I'm talking about in relation to a person who is charged with possession and not Distributing and producing. The person possessing doesn't create a victim. Only the person that produces.
Posted on 2/18/20 at 11:51 pm to nola000
Dude. I know exactly what you’re TRYING to say, but logic be hard for some people. Possession of child pornography is still a crime with a victim, bc the CHILD IS STILL BEING EXPLOITED AND USED FOR PORNOGRAPHY - pornography that exists SOLELY for the pieces of shyte like this guy that consume it. There’s still a victim. Attempting to distance or disconnect the victim from the crime of even “just possession” is such a strange and weird stance to take.
People like this guy that exist create the market that creates the victims. His actions are literally creating victims. It’s a causal chain.
People like this guy that exist create the market that creates the victims. His actions are literally creating victims. It’s a causal chain.
This post was edited on 2/18/20 at 11:53 pm
Posted on 2/19/20 at 1:04 am to BruceJender
quote:
Where are you getting 100k from
I assumed he was talking about the ones that really hustle and take every extra duty assignment they can get.
Ex: when you see LSP working construction, LSU games, Saints games, DA speed trap programs, etc. those are often extra duty assignments for which they earn a very respectable $/hr that is in addition to their state salary.
Posted on 2/19/20 at 2:43 am to Hangover Haven
quote:
I’ll never understand why the mind of a pedo isn't scattered all over the wall.
There is no cure or rehabilitation.
They should be removed from the gene pool.
Permanently.
Posted on 2/19/20 at 5:22 am to The People
quote:
And idiots like this throw it all away and give everyone in law enforcement a bad reputation.
Plenty of idiots still out there to maintain that well-earned reputation.
Posted on 2/19/20 at 6:26 am to The Midnight Rider
quote:
Dude. I know exactly what you’re TRYING to say, but logic be hard for some people. Possession of child pornography is still a crime with a victim, bc the CHILD IS STILL BEING EXPLOITED AND USED FOR PORNOGRAPHY - pornography that exists SOLELY for the pieces of shyte like this guy that consume it. There’s still a victim. Attempting to distance or disconnect the victim from the crime of even “just possession” is such a strange and weird stance to take.
People like this guy that exist create the market that creates the victims. His actions are literally creating victims. It’s a causal chain.
I don't necessarily disagree with you. That was exactly the point I was going to make.
I look at it like this, possessing pictures or video of a murder isnt necessarily illegal. But murder obviously is. Possessing media of the murder isnt creating a victim.
Now I agree with you that in the case of pornography it's a little different because the original illegal action that creates the victim, production of the pronography, typically is done with the express intent of creating the media for distribution and viewing. That's why possession of that media is illegal and not possession of media of other crimes taking place.
You seem to be reacting as though I'm green-lighting possession of child pronography. I'm not. I'm simply stating that production is way more serious than possession and I used the creation and interaction of an actual real-life victim as my reasoning.
It's kind of like the difference of going after drug dealers versus drug users. What's the point in going after drug users? They're just doing what comes naturally to them even if most of us disagree with them. If you really want to make a dent in the industry then you have to go after those producing. That's where the supply chain starts.
This post was edited on 2/19/20 at 6:27 am
Posted on 2/19/20 at 6:33 am to The Midnight Rider
Ah. I think I missed addressing one of your points that you were trying to make.
I think what you're trying to say is that the original child victim is being re-victimized each time media of them are being consumed.
Ehhh. I mean, it's not a bad argument to make but I don't know that I necessarily agree with it. The reason being is, from the viewpoint of the victim, they've only been victimized once. When the media of them was actually produced. Each time it's viewed after that, the only person aware of it is the person doing the viewing, not the victim. Now you could say that the victim's reputation is being victimized the more people view the media but I doubt that has the same impact as the original production in the mind of the victim. Plus, ignorance is bliss. I mean, if you don't know if naked pictures of you of being viewed, does it really matter? It's only a matter of embarrassment. Now that question of how many may drive you nuts but again, it's not nearly on the level of the original crime. And that's really the only point I was trying to make.
quote:
bc the CHILD IS STILL BEING EXPLOITED AND USED FOR PORNOGRAPHY -
I think what you're trying to say is that the original child victim is being re-victimized each time media of them are being consumed.
Ehhh. I mean, it's not a bad argument to make but I don't know that I necessarily agree with it. The reason being is, from the viewpoint of the victim, they've only been victimized once. When the media of them was actually produced. Each time it's viewed after that, the only person aware of it is the person doing the viewing, not the victim. Now you could say that the victim's reputation is being victimized the more people view the media but I doubt that has the same impact as the original production in the mind of the victim. Plus, ignorance is bliss. I mean, if you don't know if naked pictures of you of being viewed, does it really matter? It's only a matter of embarrassment. Now that question of how many may drive you nuts but again, it's not nearly on the level of the original crime. And that's really the only point I was trying to make.
This post was edited on 2/19/20 at 6:34 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News