Started By
Message

re: Netflix to employees: If you're offended by our content, get a job somewhere else

Posted on 5/13/22 at 3:40 pm to
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
29166 posts
Posted on 5/13/22 at 3:40 pm to
That’s awesome, one of these companies actually grew a set. I can’t wait for the inevitable meltdown coming over it
Posted by Demshoes
Up in here
Member since Aug 2015
10193 posts
Posted on 5/13/22 at 3:49 pm to
This goes against every fiber of every being of what is taught at every douchey left wing college and university. And I love it.

Lol harmful. How big of a pussy do you have to be to find something you don't agree with harmful. Soft arse kids.
Posted by tgrgrd00
Kenner, LA
Member since Jun 2004
8509 posts
Posted on 5/13/22 at 5:00 pm to
quote:

No. I’m puzzled as to why a faction on the right thinks the left is trying to legalize pedophilia. Do you know?


"A Message From the Gay Community"

That's just 1 example but I question whether you will even watch that one.

Posted by lillytiger
Member since Jun 2014
87 posts
Posted on 5/13/22 at 5:30 pm to
Ok. I actually did watch that. And I found that funny.

Unless I’m missing something, I heard the words “We’ll convert your children. We’ll make them tolerant and fair.” That sounded to me like they were throwing shade at homophonic people. Like yeah. We’ll turn them! Into nice people lol.

But I of course could be wrong. All I can say is, if they meant they’ll turn young children gay on purpose, that’s wrong. But to me, it sounded like they were picking on people who fear that.

Unfortunately, unless they actually say something illegal, it’s legal.
Posted by efrad
Member since Nov 2007
18645 posts
Posted on 5/13/22 at 5:32 pm to
quote:

homophonic people


These fricking people all sound the same!
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
66787 posts
Posted on 5/13/22 at 5:33 pm to
quote:

Unfortunately, unless they actually say something illegal, it’s legal.


sure.

doesn’t mean i’d let them anywhere near my children. i would hope you wouldn’t let yours near them either.
Posted by lillytiger
Member since Jun 2014
87 posts
Posted on 5/13/22 at 5:34 pm to
Posted by HogBalls
Member since Nov 2014
8589 posts
Posted on 5/13/22 at 5:36 pm to


Posted by lillytiger
Member since Jun 2014
87 posts
Posted on 5/13/22 at 5:41 pm to
And that’s you’re right.

As far as I know, these people are not teachers in a public school system.

And look. I’ll be honest with you. I didn’t see anything they did any worse than an offensive joke. Would I let them around my children? Unless I hear them actually say something sexual or pedo, I probably wouldn’t have a problem with them being around my children. If they were a teacher, I would want to know what they’re teaching my children. As everyone should be with every teacher. And I wouldn’t let my children alone around people I don’t know anyway. Regardless if they were in this video, at a church, camp, etc. I just don’t trust my young children around people I don’t know. I honestly wish everyone was like that.
Posted by efrad
Member since Nov 2007
18645 posts
Posted on 5/13/22 at 5:48 pm to
quote:

As far as I know, these people are not teachers in a public school system.



You walk into your sons/daughters classroom the first day of school and see this.... -- an elementary school teacher at Pleasant Ridge Montessori in the Cincinnati Public Schools system

This is just one example
Posted by lillytiger
Member since Jun 2014
87 posts
Posted on 5/13/22 at 5:51 pm to
He/she (whatever they are) is talking way too much about their current sexual orientation. I’m not ok with that. Not as a public school teacher.
This post was edited on 5/13/22 at 5:53 pm
Posted by Ponchy Tiger
Ponchatoula
Member since Aug 2004
45122 posts
Posted on 5/13/22 at 5:56 pm to
Not sure what content they are protecting in this case and don't care. If the employees don't like what their employer is selling they need to quit and find a job somewhere else.
Posted by efrad
Member since Nov 2007
18645 posts
Posted on 5/13/22 at 5:56 pm to
That's a they/them you bigot
Posted by lillytiger
Member since Jun 2014
87 posts
Posted on 5/13/22 at 5:58 pm to
Hey now. I included “(whatever they are)”

That covers it.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66492 posts
Posted on 5/13/22 at 5:58 pm to
It’s following the opposite trajectory.

100 years ago the age of consent was lower and being trans or gay was shunned or even legal.

Posted by efrad
Member since Nov 2007
18645 posts
Posted on 5/13/22 at 6:06 pm to
quote:

It’s following the opposite trajectory.

100 years ago the age of consent was lower


People entered into relationships and marriages at earlier ages in those years, but typically post pubescence/biological sexual maturity; there was never a widespread accepted attempt to normalize sexuality and sexual expression in young children who had not yet experienced physical sexual development.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66492 posts
Posted on 5/13/22 at 6:10 pm to
quote:

People entered into relationships and marriages at earlier ages in those years, but typically post pubescence/biological sexual maturity; there was never a widespread accepted attempt to normalize sexuality and sexual expression in young children who had not yet experienced physical sexual development.


I kkow There is a technical term for people into teenagers, but I’m gonna lump them in with pedos here.

As a society, we are raising the age you can frick people. We now not only include prepubescent kids, but post pubescent teenagers. That’s the opposite track of gay rights.

Posted by lillytiger
Member since Jun 2014
87 posts
Posted on 5/13/22 at 6:22 pm to
I actually know this one.

I believe the fear is the “laws” are useless when not being executed. Almost like they’re there for show.

Who’s going to protect the children if the people who are supposed to protect them do not acknowledge these laws? Or do not see them as serious offenses?

Not that I agree fully with that. I just think that’s what they believe. If I believed that fully, I would probably not think much of the laws either.
Posted by efrad
Member since Nov 2007
18645 posts
Posted on 5/13/22 at 6:26 pm to
quote:

I kkow There is a technical term for people into teenagers, but I’m gonna lump them in with pedos here.


As a society, we are raising the age you can frick people. We now not only include prepubescent kids, but post pubescent teenagers. That’s the opposite track of gay rights.



I disagree and it's because my concern is less strictly about some adult-child pedophile relationship issue and more along the lines of using taxpayer money to condition children towards living unhealthy, hedonistic lifestyles. There exists a sizable minority of mentally ill people trying to spread their mental illness under the guise of sexual acceptance. It's not about accepting homosexual individuals as much as it is a specific lifestyle and agenda where they have zero understanding of sexual boundaries or temperance.

eta-And I don't judge them for living whatever kind of life they want to live on their own time. It just doesn't belong as curriculum in elementary schools.
This post was edited on 5/13/22 at 6:28 pm
Posted by lillytiger
Member since Jun 2014
87 posts
Posted on 5/13/22 at 6:38 pm to
If alternate gender philosophy or sexual orientation was going to be taught at public schools, it should be high school health. And it should be “theory” only.

It should be taught as it is in reality and at the proper age. If at all.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram