- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
3
Posted on 9/28/18 at 2:40 pm to LSUintheNW
quote:
If the cop let's him go and the suspect kills someone else you know the city would be sued after they found out the cop let him go.
That is why I don't agree with it as in I don't agree he should be convicted.
Posted on 9/28/18 at 2:52 pm to bmy
quote:
He should be charged
And you should have your balls beaten off
Posted on 9/28/18 at 2:56 pm to bmy
quote:
He should be charged
Care to elaborate on your position? As opposed to the prior poster who is apparently running for Senate and went straight to wanting to touch your balls.
Posted on 9/28/18 at 3:30 pm to jbgleason
He's armed. CHOOT 'EM
Posted on 9/28/18 at 3:39 pm to jbgleason
he should have shot a white guy
Posted on 9/28/18 at 3:41 pm to AndyJ
quote:
Running with a gun is still threatening.
Like running with scissors, only worse.
Posted on 9/28/18 at 5:07 pm to jbgleason
quote:
Care to elaborate on your position?
Because it is in a grey area. Helps the public feel like accountability exists.
Posted on 9/28/18 at 5:18 pm to bmy
He will be charged then found not guilty. The supreme Court already made it clear on these type of cases. The cop is justified in the shooting. The media is out of control and needs to be accountable for the way they publish and share news.
Posted on 9/28/18 at 5:23 pm to bulldawg1980
What did the media do?
Should they not report that he was charged?
Should they not report that he was charged?
Posted on 9/28/18 at 5:28 pm to jbgleason
I remember this case. frick that cop. He thought a car was stolen, ran the plates, then realized it wasn't stolen, but he kept following it hoping to pull it over for another reason. He lost track of the car, then found another car that he thought was it. Drove up to the car to check it out and Hambrick started running away. Cop got out, asked him to stop the gun while he was running away, then shot him dead.
Hambrick wasn't suspected of anything. Saying he was a threat to the public because he had a gun would be like pulling up and shooting an open carry guy who ran off.
Hambrick wasn't suspected of anything. Saying he was a threat to the public because he had a gun would be like pulling up and shooting an open carry guy who ran off.
Posted on 9/28/18 at 5:30 pm to slackster
quote:
According to the warrant, Delke "became suspicious" when a white Chevrolet Impala stopped at a stop sign and "conceded the right of way by not pulling out in front of him."
Delke ran the car's license plate, the warrant says, and found the Impala was not a stolen vehicle. But the officer followed the vehicle anyway "to see if he could develop a reason to stop the Impala."
Eventually, Delke lost track of the car, the warrant states. While searching, he "mistook a different white four door sedan" in the parking lot of an apartment building for the Impala.
quote:
As the officer pulled up, Hambrick began to run, and Delke chased him on foot, even though Delke had no reason to believe Hambrick was connected to any stolen vehicles, the warrant says.
In pursuit, Delke saw a gun in Hambrick's hand, according to the warrant. The officer gave Hambrick several verbal commands, including, "Drop the gun or I'll shoot," it states.
Delke decided to fire when Hambrick kept running and didn't drop the gun, the warrant states.
The OP leaves out plenty of vital information, but that's expected considering his stance.
This post was edited on 9/28/18 at 5:32 pm
Posted on 9/28/18 at 5:31 pm to jbgleason
Yeah that cop is screwed. You can't do that.
Posted on 9/28/18 at 5:31 pm to jbgleason
I think it should be cut and dry, a cop shouldn’t have any rights to use lethal force that an armed citizen doesn’t. Replace the cop with CCL holder and what happens?
Posted on 9/28/18 at 5:34 pm to fallguy_1978
quote:
Yeah that cop is screwed. You can't do that
There are reasonable times when it can be allowed, but this situation isn't one of them.
There was no reason to believe Hambrick was an imminent threat to the public, plain and simple.
Posted on 9/28/18 at 6:05 pm to jbgleason
And if the guy turned around and fired at the officer and killed him or someone else? Stupid as hell
Posted on 9/28/18 at 6:14 pm to The Pirate King
quote:
And if the guy turned around and fired at the officer and killed him or someone else? Stupid as hell
What was he suspected of doing? There was no probable cause to even approach him.
Posted on 9/28/18 at 6:18 pm to AndyJ
quote:
Running with a gun is still threatening.
Yep. Justified. A danger to the officer and any innocent bystanders.
Posted on 9/28/18 at 6:20 pm to jbgleason
So all you have to do if you have a gun in a confrontation with the police is run faster than them?
awesome!
awesome!
Posted on 9/28/18 at 6:22 pm to slackster
quote:
What was he suspected of doing? There was no probable cause to even approach him.
This is not relevant at all. Once he brandished firearm on a cop and refused to drop it, that’s a new crime.
This post was edited on 9/28/18 at 6:23 pm
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News