Started By
Message

re: Morganza Spillway may or may not open for a 3rd time -- lack of clear info from ACoE

Posted on 3/3/19 at 4:43 pm to
Posted by Halftrack
The Wild Blue Yonder
Member since Apr 2015
2763 posts
Posted on 3/3/19 at 4:43 pm to
The plants would have to use desalinization plants until enough water could be re-diverted downstream to push the saltwater head enough to allow a tap from the top (lighter) fresh water. Even this is dicey.
Posted by Ignignot
Member since Mar 2009
18823 posts
Posted on 3/3/19 at 4:47 pm to
Reverse osmosis and microfiltration is expensive as frick
Posted by Halftrack
The Wild Blue Yonder
Member since Apr 2015
2763 posts
Posted on 3/3/19 at 4:53 pm to
Yep. But replacing an entire plant is more expensive.
Posted by TigerstuckinMS
Member since Nov 2005
33687 posts
Posted on 3/3/19 at 5:09 pm to
They wouldn't run desalination in perpetuity. If they were using the river for cooling and enough water level remained to keep their penstocks covered, and it made economic sense based on the remaining life of the plant, they'd just replace the parts of the plant that touch saltwater with materials that could withstand it.

If they were using it for process water, some plants absolutely would be shut down because of the intense energy costs associated with desalination. shite, Methenex literally moved an entire plant to a different hemisphere because production costs were cheap enough in Geismar to warrant it. Before Methenex's plant in Geismar was built, it was shut down and out of service in Chile. I'm not suggesting that they built a new plant. I'm saying they literally took it apart and barged the equipment from Chile to Geismar and reassembled it.

Plant operators will do whatever makes the most economic sense, whatever the river decides to do.
This post was edited on 3/3/19 at 5:20 pm
Posted by Mudminnow
Houston, TX
Member since Aug 2004
34166 posts
Posted on 3/3/19 at 5:56 pm to
Last time Morganza was opened was mid May.

It's the beginning of March.
Posted by Halftrack
The Wild Blue Yonder
Member since Apr 2015
2763 posts
Posted on 3/3/19 at 5:58 pm to
Absofrickinglutely. There is no loyalty. That is why Louisiana should tax the plants right up to the point where the plants won’t leave.

Because one day, they will.
Posted by 200MPHCOBRA
Metairie
Member since Nov 2016
477 posts
Posted on 3/3/19 at 6:43 pm to
I could see a crash program to drill wells on plant property, a few 1000' 12" wells could supply a couple thousand gallons a minute, and an acre or two pond to have a supply. I think it could be worked out.

Of course it would still suck for many other reasons.
Posted by Capt ST
High Plains
Member since Aug 2011
13347 posts
Posted on 3/3/19 at 6:48 pm to
There’d be some piping rework for CW lines which would suck because they are large bore and most are buried. Process water could be seperate system thru desalination unit. But there’s plenty of plants that do this and stay running. They were designed for it though. It would be an expensive endeavor to swap.
Posted by TigerstuckinMS
Member since Nov 2005
33687 posts
Posted on 3/3/19 at 6:54 pm to
quote:

I could see a crash program to drill wells on plant property, a few 1000' 12" wells could supply a couple thousand gallons a minute, and an acre or two pond to have a supply. I think it could be worked out.


Yeah, assuming that they can get a permit to drill and pull that much water out, I imagine a site or two would go that route. I have no idea how many Daniel Plainviews the aquifer can withstand.

This post was edited on 3/3/19 at 7:07 pm
Posted by TDsngumbo
Member since Oct 2011
45781 posts
Posted on 3/3/19 at 9:51 pm to
BUMP

New forecast has it right back up to 43.5’ in BR with a slightly faster rise than projected. Still very possible it goes higher than 43.5’.
Posted by WizardSleeve
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2011
1862 posts
Posted on 3/3/19 at 10:25 pm to
Damn that 1980 LSU report was full of info. Ominous stuff.

Opens with essentially: Humans have never successfully controlled an alluvial river. Every subsequent flood will encounter a higher river bed due to sedimentation from the periods between floods when velocity slows. Inevitably each flood will get higher and higher in elevation even though the flow may not necessarily increase increase in volume.

Finishes with: The river will overtake the ORCS if nothing is done and it will permanently go down the Atchafalaya, turning LA infrastructure and way of life upside down. It will cause catastrophic damage. Every route from West to East LA will be destroyed, the closest route to get from Houston to NOLA will be via I-20. Morgan city and surrounding communities would be destroyed. Houma/Thibodaux area will be under 1-2' of water during the annual river flood periods. Fresh water would be scarce for many south LA communities and industry. Shipping down the intracoastal canal would be cutoff and impossible as the IC would be silted up at the new river. The southeast part of the state to northwest of NOLA will become a saltwater estuary.

IThe river will change course, it is inevitable. That was the gist of the report.

quote:

Probably the most important single conclusion reached by this study is that in th~ long run the Atchafalaya River will become the principal distributary of the Mississippi River and that the current main-stem will become an estuary of the Gulf of Mexico. Just when this will occur cannot be predicted: it could happen next year, during the next decade, or sometime in the next thirty or forty years. But the final outcome is simply a matter of
time and it is only prudent to prepare for it.
This post was edited on 3/3/19 at 10:32 pm
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
102519 posts
Posted on 3/3/19 at 10:36 pm to
quote:

Finishes with: The river will overtake the ORCS if nothing is done and it will permanently go down the Atchafalaya, turning LA infrastructure and way of life upside down. It will cause catastrophic damage. Every route from West to East LA will be destroyed, the closest route to get from Houston to NOLA will be via I-20.


North La. finna boom
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
108406 posts
Posted on 3/3/19 at 10:38 pm to
Yeah...it's definitely not something you read the kids before bedtime.
This post was edited on 3/3/19 at 10:51 pm
Posted by PhiTiger1764
Lurker since Aug 2003
Member since Oct 2009
14331 posts
Posted on 3/3/19 at 10:40 pm to
quote:

1980 LSU report

quote:

Opens with essentially: Humans have never successfully controlled an alluvial river.

So it will be impossible to do so moving forward with human advancement and technology?
quote:

Probably the most important single conclusion reached by this study is that in th~ long run the Atchafalaya River will become the principal distributary of the Mississippi River. Just when this will occur cannot be predicted: it could happen next year, during the next decade, or sometime in the next thirty or forty years. But the final outcome is simply a matter of time and it is only prudent to prepare for it.

It’s been 39 years since this report.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
102519 posts
Posted on 3/3/19 at 10:47 pm to
So this year it is.
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 3/3/19 at 10:49 pm to
You mean LC
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
63082 posts
Posted on 3/3/19 at 10:53 pm to
My parents house would be a hotspot for redfish trout and flounder? Its raised...we all in.
Posted by BeepNode
Lafayette
Member since Feb 2014
10005 posts
Posted on 3/3/19 at 10:59 pm to
I don't know much about these things, but am I naive for assuming that, short of some sort of structural failure, "they" would flood a lot of other places before they let it topple the levees in Baton Rouge?

Are the levees on the Port Allen side the same height as the levees in Baton Rouge?
Posted by OysterPoBoy
City of St. George
Member since Jul 2013
40866 posts
Posted on 3/3/19 at 11:05 pm to
quote:

Are the levees on the Port Allen side the same height as the levees in Baton Rouge?



If so we need to go scrape off a few inches.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
102519 posts
Posted on 3/3/19 at 11:13 pm to
quote:

I don't know much about these things, but am I naive for assuming that, short of some sort of structural failure, "they" would flood a lot of other places before they let it topple the levees in Baton Rouge? 


Those other places would file injunctions with the quickness before that happened. Anyway, the most likely occurrence is an unexpected blowout somewhere along the line, not a gentle overtopping.
Jump to page
Page First 25 26 27 28 29 ... 107
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 27 of 107Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram