- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Moral and Legal Question Concerning Hitting a Dog
Posted on 1/19/14 at 8:27 pm to DeathValley85
Posted on 1/19/14 at 8:27 pm to DeathValley85
quote:
Hitting a dog can damage your car that much? What the heck do you drive?
Subaru
0
Posted on 1/19/14 at 8:29 pm to yellowfin
quote:
His insurance is going to have a deductible, I'd at least expect the dog owner to cover that.
You are incorrect. The deductible does not apply for a liability claim
Posted on 1/19/14 at 8:46 pm to wheelr
quote:
I upvoted you, frick the haters.
You did nothing wrong.
I downvoted for both of you being dickheads.
Posted on 1/19/14 at 8:48 pm to jcole4lsu
quote:
Dog owners responsibility to make sure the dog is either on a leash or on their own property. Besides being the right thing to do in terms of keeping others and their property safe, it's the right thing to do to keep the animal safe as well.
I hate shitty pet owners
Posted on 1/19/14 at 9:26 pm to rpg005
quote:
You are incorrect. The deductible does not apply for a liability claim
Wow. Some of you have no idea how insurance works.
Posted on 1/19/14 at 9:28 pm to wheelr
you didnt damage your bumper if you just clipped the dog and it just limped off. quit being a dick and trying to get someone to pay for the time you hit something in a parking lot
asshat
asshat
Posted on 1/19/14 at 9:33 pm to wheelr
Damn ! How big was this fricking dog ?
Dogs should not be on the streets without a leash.
Dogs should not be on the streets without a leash.
Posted on 1/19/14 at 9:33 pm to Cruiserhog
I swear... A lot of you people are retarded.
Posted on 1/19/14 at 9:42 pm to wheelr
File a claim with your insurance, pay your comp deductible and get your car fixed. Dog owner is negligent by allowing his dog out in the road, his homeowners policy should reimburse your deductible and your insurer for their payments.
ETA You pay your deductible to the shop that repairs your car along with the insurance check. Not worded in the best way in the first sentence.
ETA You pay your deductible to the shop that repairs your car along with the insurance check. Not worded in the best way in the first sentence.
This post was edited on 1/19/14 at 9:44 pm
Posted on 1/19/14 at 9:42 pm to wheelr
Throw the dog back at the owner
Posted on 1/19/14 at 9:51 pm to wheelr
I wouldn't do it, but the dog owner certainly deserves to pay. That could easily have been a more serious accident if a motorist swerved to avoid the dog and either ran off the road or hit another car.
Posted on 1/19/14 at 9:59 pm to MikeBRLA
quote:
Wow. Some of you have no idea how insurance works.
Actually I do. The deductible would only apply to a property loss, not liability. In the event that the dog owner filed the claim on his homeowners insurance there would be no deductible.
Posted on 1/19/14 at 10:00 pm to wheelr
Tell him you'll go back to Ville Platte and finish the job if he doesn't pay for your bumper
/cop
/cop
Posted on 1/19/14 at 10:01 pm to wheelr
There is no way it cracked your bumper and the dog just limped off. Show us a picture of your bumper. You probably can't even see the damage
Posted on 1/19/14 at 10:02 pm to rpg005
yellowfin meant the OPs insurance, not the dog owners.
Posted on 1/19/14 at 10:03 pm to rpg005
quote:
Actually I do. The deductible would only apply to a property loss, not liability. In the event that the dog owner filed the claim on his homeowners insurance there would be no deductible.
In the post you were responding to the claim would be filed by the car owner to fix his own car, thus not a liability claim.
Posted on 1/19/14 at 10:06 pm to CaptainsWafer
quote:
yellowfin meant the OPs insurance, not the dog owners.
Thank you.
This post was edited on 1/19/14 at 10:07 pm
Posted on 1/19/14 at 10:10 pm to MikeBRLA
I was referring to the homeowner. Misread yellowfins post....
Sorry for the confusion!
Sorry for the confusion!
This post was edited on 1/19/14 at 10:11 pm
Posted on 1/19/14 at 10:11 pm to wheelr
This thread is Germans [shepherd].
Seriously though, you don't want the To hire any attorney that takes this case.
Comp usually covers animals. File a comp claim, get your car fixed, give your insurance the guy's info, let them pursue it if it's worth it (it's not), go on about your life.
The end.
Don't over think this.
Seriously though, you don't want the To hire any attorney that takes this case.
Comp usually covers animals. File a comp claim, get your car fixed, give your insurance the guy's info, let them pursue it if it's worth it (it's not), go on about your life.
The end.
Don't over think this.
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News