- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Montana couple sues Albertsons after knife slashing
Posted on 9/20/21 at 12:10 pm to DemonKA3268
Posted on 9/20/21 at 12:10 pm to DemonKA3268
Things like this will get interesting once "not being able to ask if you're a felon/been arrested" goes mainstream.
0
Posted on 9/20/21 at 12:12 pm to mauser
quote:
If Albertsons is held responsible for felons or mentals with non violent pasts then nobody will ever employ anybody with any felony conviction or any history of mental problems.
Right. So let's just stop employing felons all together, so when they get out they have no way of reincorporating back into society and making a living. I wonder what would happen....
Just silly to try to pin any blame on Albertson's.
Posted on 9/20/21 at 12:12 pm to Wtodd
quote:
Nice answer Rep (D) Something, something
Surely you don't think I was being serious.
Posted on 9/20/21 at 12:13 pm to DemonKA3268
Well liberals dont want you to be able to ask if people have a criminal past on their applications.
this is what you get.
this is what you get.
Posted on 9/20/21 at 12:13 pm to NIH
quote:
There should be no lawsuits ever unless it’s doctors suing hospitals over non-competes or other doctors over surgery centers.
. it's funny these people don't realize they are virtue signaling as hard as anyone else.
Posted on 9/20/21 at 12:14 pm to DemonKA3268
quote:
Surely you don't think I was being serious.
Of course not but you gave the typical Dem answer
Posted on 9/20/21 at 12:15 pm to Wtodd
quote:
Of course not but you gave the typical Dem answer
But of course. That's their way.
Posted on 9/20/21 at 12:16 pm to Scruffy
All of the questions you asked will be answered during litigation. Do you think Albertsons is going to volunteer potentially damaging information willingly?
Also, Google "vicarious liability". I have no idea if this applies in Montana.
Also, Google "vicarious liability". I have no idea if this applies in Montana.
This post was edited on 9/20/21 at 12:27 pm
Posted on 9/20/21 at 12:16 pm to NIH
quote:There should be lawsuits when the entity involved is at fault.
There should be no lawsuits ever unless it’s doctors suing hospitals over non-competes or other doctors over surgery centers.
How is Albertsons at fault here?
Would they still be at fault if it happened on their property and he wasn’t an employee?
What about actions he takes off of their property during his time as an employee?
What about the actions of non-felon employees? The fact that he is a felon seems to be the driving force of many people’s arguments.
This post was edited on 9/20/21 at 12:20 pm
Posted on 9/20/21 at 12:17 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
it's funny these people don't realize they are virtue signaling as hard as anyone else.
The only view I hold is that the one who committed the act is at fault.
I don’t see how Albertsons should be liable for employee actions that they didn’t support or have them perform.
This post was edited on 9/20/21 at 12:19 pm
Posted on 9/20/21 at 12:17 pm to DemonKA3268
quote:
Gotta love our litigious society.
It was an employee of the store.
Posted on 9/20/21 at 12:18 pm to teke184
quote:
If you are an accounting firm and hire a convicted embezzler, you should be liable when he steals again.
shite they can be held liable by just putting a new grad on an audit that makes a mistake. Not even intent to mislead, but a genuine screw up by someone green.
Posted on 9/20/21 at 12:19 pm to Scruffy
yes, you. you're virtue signaling.
Posted on 9/20/21 at 12:20 pm to idlewatcher
quote:
What degree of security, if any, should be provided by Albertsons in your view?
not hiring violent felons on parole would be my first thought to avoid having your customers at risk of death from your employees
This post was edited on 9/20/21 at 12:21 pm
Posted on 9/20/21 at 12:20 pm to Scruffy
quote:
There should be lawsuits when the entity involved is at fault. How is Albertsons at fault here? Would they still be at fault if it happened on their property and he wasn’t an employee? What about actions he takes off of their property during his time as an employee? What about the actions of non-felon employees?
Posted on 9/20/21 at 12:20 pm to Scruffy
Vicarious liability is a legal doctrine that holds the employer responsible for tortious acts and negligence of an employee.
I’d imagine whatever insurance is available has a criminal acts exclusion, though.
I’d imagine whatever insurance is available has a criminal acts exclusion, though.
Posted on 9/20/21 at 12:20 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:Ok.
yes, you. you're virtue signaling.
Posted on 9/20/21 at 12:22 pm to dgnx6
quote:
this is what you get.
We elect lawyers to public office, who then pass laws friendly to lawyers. The ultimate cronyism.
We are an overly litigious society, but this case isn't one of those.
Posted on 9/20/21 at 12:22 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
It was an employee of the store.
I know, Roger.
Posted on 9/20/21 at 12:23 pm to Scruffy
quote:
What about actions he takes off of their property during his time as an employee?
Companies have been held liable for their employees off property.
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News