- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Mom suing Duck Commander and Louisiana DOTD for daughters death....
Posted on 4/8/16 at 6:42 am to tduecen
Posted on 4/8/16 at 6:42 am to tduecen
In that line of thinking, people who are in accidents involving drunk drivers should sue the parents of the person who grew up to farm the corn that was sued to create the alcohol that......
1
Posted on 4/8/16 at 7:12 am to tduecen
And when all is said and done, mom will not have her daughter back. Nor will she feel one bit better about it. This is why running out and suing behind emotion is retarded.
Suing to cover damages and missed work, ok - I can see that. This woman wants to hit the jackpot.
Suing to cover damages and missed work, ok - I can see that. This woman wants to hit the jackpot.
Posted on 4/8/16 at 7:15 am to tduecen
DOTD will settle, they always do.
DC will more than likely as well just to avoid the headache.
Straight money grab by the mom, still wont bring her daughter back.
DC will more than likely as well just to avoid the headache.
Straight money grab by the mom, still wont bring her daughter back.
Posted on 4/8/16 at 7:17 am to tduecen
Yea those waiver of subrogation and additional insured endorsements are gonna be hard to overcome for her to come after Duck Commander for money.
Posted on 4/8/16 at 7:20 am to tduecen
I don't get it, she is suing because she "believes" that a big rig ran her daughter off the road, but has no proof?
But then the lawsuit makes it sound like it was a fact that she was ran off the road by the big rig.
But then the lawsuit makes it sound like it was a fact that she was ran off the road by the big rig.
Posted on 4/8/16 at 7:37 am to DirtyMikeandtheBoys
quote:
suing DOTD?
We're never getting a fricking loop now
This shite happens all the time.
Posted on 4/8/16 at 7:40 am to stout
quote:
these type of lawsuits work. They throw everyone they can into it.
Well thank you captain obvious...
Posted on 4/8/16 at 7:50 am to laangler21
It's not a money grab if they're at fault. Do people not realize this?
LINK
quote:
In most car accident cases, the key issue is determining which driver is at fault for the accident. Usually, if one driver is negligent -- that is, did not use reasonable care or caution while driving -- he or she will be at fault. (To learn more about fault in car accidents, read Nolo's article Car Accidents: Proving Fault.)
However, in some situations, the law can assign fault to someone who was not driving or even present in the car at the time of the accident. Although this sounds surprising, there are a number of common situations where this can occur.
LINK
Posted on 4/8/16 at 7:57 am to dragginass
Posted on 4/8/16 at 7:59 am to warlock1974
Terrible analogy.
Posted on 4/8/16 at 8:02 am to Lionnation1993
quote:
Kenna Brah
Woah bro
Posted on 4/8/16 at 8:02 am to TJGator1215
quote:
It's not a money grab if they're at fault. Do people not realize this?
Suing DOTD for the reasons stated in the article is the very definition of a money grab.
Posted on 4/8/16 at 8:03 am to jbgleason
quote:
You want to sue someone for a specific negligent act? Fine. But naming everyone and their momma in a shotgun attempt to get some cash? frick you.
well the time limits can be draconian. that's the main reason why they do this. Louisiana has a short statute of limitations so you kind of have to throw everybody in or else you may lose your ability to sue the "right" party
Posted on 4/8/16 at 8:07 am to mtntiger
quote:
Also, how is DC responsible? The trucking company would be a contractor, so the trucking company would be responsible not DC, correct?
depends on the contractor. if there is a contract wherein the trucking company has an indemnification clause, they will be dismissed pretty quickly (or DC will be left in, in name only)
and these companies have insurance companies who will handle these claims, and these insurance companies are major influences in how the rules about lawsuit procedure are written. i'm not excusing suing a party that is potentially not liable, but it's how plaintiffs have to work within the system heavily influenced by insurance companies (which we assume is how insurers prefer it)
Posted on 4/8/16 at 8:27 am to tduecen
Who is representing her?
Posted on 4/8/16 at 8:29 am to tduecen
So super creepy story:
I matched with this Madison girl on Tinder. She was cute and had good personality. She never responded after a day of texting. I didn't know why but never bothered her. The next day I saw about the wreck on the news. Super sad stuff.
I use to have a pic of the match, but figured it was best to delete. RIP
I matched with this Madison girl on Tinder. She was cute and had good personality. She never responded after a day of texting. I didn't know why but never bothered her. The next day I saw about the wreck on the news. Super sad stuff.
I use to have a pic of the match, but figured it was best to delete. RIP
This post was edited on 4/8/16 at 8:32 am
Posted on 4/8/16 at 8:29 am to SlowFlowPro
Does lawsuit include the trucking company? The news report just seems to thrown in that ABC was a licensee of Duck Commander and does not mention if they were contracted to carry their product at the time. I have not read much on this, so it may have been stated when it happened.
Posted on 4/8/16 at 8:31 am to dallastigers
based on the report i assume EVERYONE was named. it would be negligent not to
Posted on 4/8/16 at 8:32 am to tduecen
I thought they were going to say she was distracted blowing a duck call while driving.
Posted on 4/8/16 at 8:32 am to jbgleason
quote:
You want to sue someone for a specific negligent act? Fine. But naming everyone and their momma in a shotgun attempt to get some cash? frick you.
you have to sue everyone. otherwise, the person you do sue uses the straw man defense and you get nothing.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News