- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Moderna launches coronavirus vaccine Phase 3 trial - 30,000 US Participants
Posted on 7/27/20 at 10:28 am to goofball
Posted on 7/27/20 at 10:28 am to goofball
quote:
After two doses, scientists will closely track which group experiences more infections as they go about their daily routines, especially in areas where the virus still is spreading unchecked.
I'm no scientist and the only science courses I took in college were Geology courses.
BUT....isn't the only (or at least, the BEST) way to really show if the vaccine works is to purposefully expose these participants to the virus?
You would think that they would look for participants with the lowest at-risk potential, LIKE COLLEGE STUDENTS, and purposefully expose them to see if the vaccine works.
Posted on 7/27/20 at 10:31 am to goofball
In addition to this, the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine signed like $250 million dollars worth of deals with Emergent (Baltimore based) to produce vaccines. US govt already gave Emergent more than half a billion dollars to expand capacity to produce vaccines.
Posted on 7/27/20 at 10:32 am to goofball
CNBC said the 45 participants in phase 2, 40 were white and 5 blacks.
Posted on 7/27/20 at 10:32 am to hendersonshands
quote:
In addition to this, the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine signed like $250 million dollars worth of deals with Emergent (Baltimore based) to produce vaccines. US govt already gave Emergent more than half a billion dollars to expand capacity to produce vaccines.
I believe this one is a more traditional vaccine, not the mRNA one like Moderna that is a new style.
Posted on 7/27/20 at 10:34 am to hendersonshands
quote:
In addition to this, the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine signed like $250 million dollars worth of deals with Emergent (Baltimore based) to produce vaccines. US govt already gave Emergent more than half a billion dollars to expand capacity to produce vaccines.
Well, yeah. How else is this administration going to bribe Big Pharma to "lower" insulin and other hot button Rx prices?
Posted on 7/27/20 at 10:34 am to MMauler
quote:It violates just about every ethical standard in scientific research to purposefully expose humans to disease.
You would think that they would look for participants with the lowest at-risk potential, LIKE COLLEGE STUDENTS, and purposefully expose them to see if the vaccine works.
Posted on 7/27/20 at 10:35 am to MMauler
quote:
You would think that they would look for participants with the lowest at-risk potential, LIKE COLLEGE STUDENTS, and purposefully expose them to see if the vaccine works.
I can’t find the article where I read it awhile back but it’s my understanding when surveying for participants they’re looking for people who will be exposed to higher viral loads to participate. Healthcare workers, those working with the public, etc.
Posted on 7/27/20 at 10:35 am to RollTide1987
quote:
I don't care if vaccine effective.....if it'll get these pussies out of the house...
Exactly.
They are already crying that cutting unemployment is "sending people to their deaths".
The fact that Amazon, grocery workers, manufacturing workers etc haven't stopped working is beyond them I suppose.
Posted on 7/27/20 at 10:35 am to Fun Bunch
[quote]This is the one that Fauci is affiliated with.
Where’s the MSM when you need them? The fricking story writes itself, there’s laws against this sort of thing for the other 99%. It’s like letting Saban head the playoff search committee for Christ’s sake.
Where’s the MSM when you need them? The fricking story writes itself, there’s laws against this sort of thing for the other 99%. It’s like letting Saban head the playoff search committee for Christ’s sake.
Posted on 7/27/20 at 10:36 am to lsu xman
quote:
CNBC said the 45 participants in phase 2, 40 were white and 5 blacks.
Talk about a lose-lose.
No matter how they conduct these tests, it will be called racist.
More whites -- Trump doesn't care about black people and blacks should comprise at least half of the participants.
More blacks -- Trump is a racist because he's using blacks as guinea pigs.
And, the fact that Trump has absof*ckinglutely nothing to do with it will not stop them from putting it all on Trump no matter how the tests are conducted.
This post was edited on 7/27/20 at 10:39 am
Posted on 7/27/20 at 10:36 am to Gravitiger
quote:
It violates just about every ethical standard in scientific research to purposefully expose humans to disease.
Not if they select people who are already being readily exposed due to their current job or lifestyle. That’s well within ethics standards for these kind of studies.
Posted on 7/27/20 at 10:37 am to BluegrassBelle
quote:There is a difference between using people who may be naturally exposed and intentionally giving it to them.
Not if they select people who are already being readily exposed due to their current job or lifestyle. That’s well within ethics standards for these kind of studies.
You can't intentionally give a prostitute gonorrhea to see how a treatment works, just because her lifestyle already readily exposes her to it.
This post was edited on 7/27/20 at 10:40 am
Posted on 7/27/20 at 10:38 am to Gravitiger
quote:
It violates just about every ethical standard in scientific research to purposefully expose humans to disease.
Even if the group has less than a .04% chance of getting really sick or exhibiting any symptoms whatsoever, AND, they will be under doctor's care and evaluation the entire time?
Posted on 7/27/20 at 10:39 am to Fun Bunch
The Oxford vaccine has elicited side effects in 60%+ of patients, but they're mild (headaches mostly and fever in about 15%) and usually go away pretty quickly, so they're looking into possibly going for the 2 dose method similar to the Moderna vaccine or just supplementing it with Tylenol.
It's fascinating to me how quickly these are getting done. If they're successful, these men and women deserve to eat and drink for free for the rest of their lives. Mind blowing shite.
It's fascinating to me how quickly these are getting done. If they're successful, these men and women deserve to eat and drink for free for the rest of their lives. Mind blowing shite.
Posted on 7/27/20 at 10:40 am to MMauler
Realistically they would be ok, but it's an ethical nightmare. That's why they've just chosen places where it's more likely that they'll be exposed.
Posted on 7/27/20 at 10:40 am to MMauler
quote:
Even if the group has less than a .04% chance of getting really sick or exhibiting any symptoms whatsoever, AND, they will be under doctor's care and evaluation the entire time?
You can ethically have a participant that is already regularly exposed to the virus (like a healthcare worker).
You can’t ethically give someone the vaccine trial and then stick them in a room with COVID-19 positive subjects to force exposure.
Posted on 7/27/20 at 10:41 am to Boomdaddy65201
quote:
Where’s the MSM when you need them? The fricking story writes itself, there’s laws against this sort of thing for the other 99%. It’s like letting Saban head the playoff search committee for Christ’s sake.
So you think the government shouldn't help to try to end a pandemic?
Posted on 7/27/20 at 10:41 am to goofball
Let’s hope for as few SAEs as possible.
Posted on 7/27/20 at 10:42 am to BluegrassBelle
quote:Which is exactly what I was saying in response to the person who suggested we should "purposefully expose them to see if the vaccine works."
You can ethically have a participant that is already regularly exposed to the virus (like a healthcare worker).
You can’t ethically give someone the vaccine trial and then stick them in a room with COVID-19 positive subjects to force exposure.
This post was edited on 7/27/20 at 10:44 am
Posted on 7/27/20 at 10:44 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
I believe this one is a more traditional vaccine, not the mRNA one like Moderna that is a new style.
it's not RNA based but it is still experimental
quote:
AZD1222, which was developed by researchers at Oxford’s Jenner Institute, works differently, by using a genetically engineered virus, called adenovirus, which was taken from chimps and modified not to replicate and sicken people. It carries a gene for one of the proteins in SARS-Cov-2 and inserts it into a recipient’s cells. The virus causes the patient’s cells to make that protein, which is then recognized by the immune system as foreign. This results in an immune response.
The platform has not been used in an approved vaccine. But it has been used in experimental vaccines against the viruses that cause other outbreaks, including the Ebola virus and the virus that causes Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS). That work left the Oxford group ready when SARS-CoV-2, a related virus, became a threat.
Popular
Back to top



5




