
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Michigan clock-gate question
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:15 pm
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:15 pm
The defender is leaping up and touches the ball. His feet aren’t on the ground. They say the clock stops then?
What if he had batted it to a player in bounds while he was in the air? Would it still be out of bounds and no completion?
What if he just batted it in the air and it landed in bounds?
Shouldn’t the guys feet have to touch the ground while the ball is in his possession for the clock to stop?
Can someone explain this? What am I mistaken about?
Looks to me like his feet were still in the air when the refs said there was still one second on the clock.
I thought either the feet have to touch the ground or the ball for the clock to stop.
What if he had batted it to a player in bounds while he was in the air? Would it still be out of bounds and no completion?
What if he just batted it in the air and it landed in bounds?
Shouldn’t the guys feet have to touch the ground while the ball is in his possession for the clock to stop?
Can someone explain this? What am I mistaken about?
Looks to me like his feet were still in the air when the refs said there was still one second on the clock.
I thought either the feet have to touch the ground or the ball for the clock to stop.
This post was edited on 9/9/26 at 8:17 pm
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:18 pm to UptownJoeBrown
I heard it Hit the goal post cross bar before the clock hit 0:00

Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:18 pm to UptownJoeBrown
quote:
Can someone explain this?
Since #18 for Western Michigan had already stepped out of bounds, the moment he touches the ball, the play ends, thus the clock will stop immediately. No one else could have caught it legally, even if they were in bounds.
quote:
What am I mistaken about?
You posted this question on the OT, and not "more sports board"
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:20 pm to East Coast Band
quote:
Since #18 for Western Michigan had already stepped out of bounds, the moment he touches the ball, the play ends, thus the clock will stop immediately. No one else could have caught it legally, even if they were in bounds.
Ahhhhh ok. I didn’t realize he already stepped out of bounds. Thanks
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:22 pm to East Coast Band
So of another player who had not stepped out of bounds batted it away while still in the air then no time would have been added?
Basically if he knew it was going out of bounds he shouldn’t have touched it.
Basically if he knew it was going out of bounds he shouldn’t have touched it.
This post was edited on 9/9/26 at 8:23 pm
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:32 pm to Kafka
Maybe we should let AI ref games.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:35 pm to UptownJoeBrown
He jumped up from out of bounds. If he would’ve jumped from in bounds, the clock would’ve stopped
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:44 pm to UptownJoeBrown
Michigan lost.
Western Michigan won.
It’s that simple.
Western Michigan won.
It’s that simple.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:49 pm to PotatoChip
You mean if he jumped from in bounds it would not have stopped.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:50 pm to UptownJoeBrown
frick Michigan. Any other questions?
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:54 pm to Deep Purple Haze
Yeah. The scoreboard clock should be the one that counts because that is what everyone sees including the coaches who make decisions based upon what the scoreboard clock says.
What if the scoreboard clock showed more time than the “official” unseen clock in another situation where it mattered the other way. The ref gonna say well actually they called the timeout too late even though they were looking at the scoreboard clock to decide when to call the timeout with 1 second left? Actually there was no time left to call your timeout. Sorry coach. You should be looking at our secret official clock.
What if the scoreboard clock showed more time than the “official” unseen clock in another situation where it mattered the other way. The ref gonna say well actually they called the timeout too late even though they were looking at the scoreboard clock to decide when to call the timeout with 1 second left? Actually there was no time left to call your timeout. Sorry coach. You should be looking at our secret official clock.
This post was edited on 9/9/26 at 8:57 pm
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:55 pm to UptownJoeBrown
Yep, they fricking cheated
Posted on 9/9/26 at 9:25 pm to UptownJoeBrown
quote:
Yeah. The scoreboard clock should be the one that counts because that is what everyone sees including the coaches who make decisions based upon what the scoreboard clock says.
There has been multiple videos come out that were taken in the stadium that show the scoreboard clock still showed 0:01 then the defender touched the ball. The error was an NBC issue.
I have a thread on MSB where I initially showed there SHOULD have been time on the clock now some of the videos are posted on the last page that show there was time on the stadium clock.
Posted on 9/10/26 at 6:16 am to Obtuse1
Central Michigan would have won that game but since it was Western.....
Posted on 9/10/26 at 1:15 pm to UptownJoeBrown
quote:
So of another player who had not stepped out of bounds batted it away while still in the air then no time would have been added?
Basically if he knew it was going out of bounds he shouldn’t have touched it.
If he had not stepped out if bounds first, the clock would continue until either the ball hit the ground.
There is a plus in his trying to catch it....It kept a Michigan guy from catching it. So, he really did the right play...

Popular
Back to top
10













