- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Mayor charged with voyeurism after allegedly sniffing teen girl’s underwear
Posted on 2/19/26 at 11:26 am to TT9
Posted on 2/19/26 at 11:26 am to TT9
quote:
you loons can't be helped.
The below fits your TDS again…
quote:
No moderate or independent as you like to call yourself can have the level of TDS that you have. You push your TDS into anything you can while also complaining when others make political posts in a topic, and when your TDS comes out you come across just like those blue hair whistle blowing leftist female baffoons who get wet from the attention of obstructing and shouting out their TDS and leftist propaganda.
0
Posted on 2/19/26 at 11:44 am to Crackerj
Well done 
Posted on 2/19/26 at 11:51 am to Will Cover
Must be a republican or this never would have made the news.
Posted on 2/19/26 at 11:52 am to Will Cover
He was looking for Cybercrabs... IYKYK
Posted on 2/19/26 at 11:58 am to Will Cover
18?
Posted on 2/19/26 at 12:08 pm to HeadSlash
quote:
Don't understand the allure of this.
While I’m not defending this creep, it’s pretty much biological fact that we men are enticed by the pheromones (or natural scents) of females.
This guy is just taking it to a weird and perverted level.
Posted on 2/19/26 at 12:44 pm to LA Lightning
So the girl sets up the hidden camera to record the guy…and it’s used to charge the guy with voyeurism?
That has to be a first.
That has to be a first.
This post was edited on 2/19/26 at 12:45 pm
Posted on 2/19/26 at 12:57 pm to AwgustaDawg
quote:
White culture is out of control....somebody has to do something about these white folks....such a sick culture....sad....
hundreds of usual suspects shot someone while you posted that.
let's be honest 75% of this site would do the same thing to livvy dunne while she was at LSU as teen.
This post was edited on 2/19/26 at 12:58 pm
Posted on 2/19/26 at 2:01 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
it’s pretty much biological fact that we men are enticed by the pheromones (or natural scents) of females.
nah, that's just the perfume the stripper is wearing.
Posted on 2/19/26 at 4:04 pm to TT9
quote:
you loons can't be helped.
Dude you’re no different than the people you’re mocking.
I called you out on this earlier in the thread and for some reason those posts disappeared. Curious why that happened.
This post was edited on 2/19/26 at 4:06 pm
Posted on 2/19/26 at 6:33 pm to Will Cover
Were they still in the underwear?
Guy may just have a laundry problem.
Guy may just have a laundry problem.
Posted on 2/19/26 at 6:57 pm to lsuconnman
quote:
So the girl sets up the hidden camera to record the guy…and it’s used to charge the guy with voyeurism?
That has to be a first.
This is definitely an interesting case. Here is the statute they charged him with:
quote:
(A) No person, for the purpose of sexually arousing or gratifying the person's self, shall commit trespass or otherwise surreptitiously invade the privacy of another, to spy or eavesdrop upon another.
(B) No person shall knowingly commit trespass or otherwise secretly or surreptitiously videotape, film, photograph, broadcast, stream, or otherwise record another person, in a place where a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy, for the purpose of viewing the private areas of that person.
(C) No person shall knowingly commit trespass or otherwise secretly or surreptitiously videotape, film, photograph, broadcast, stream, or otherwise record a minor, in a place where a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy, for the purpose of viewing the private areas of the minor.
(D) No person shall secretly or surreptitiously videotape, film, photograph, or otherwise record another person above, under, or through the clothing being worn by that other person for the purpose of viewing the body of, or the undergarments worn by, that other person.
Not sure which one they charged this guy under. They all seem like a stretch for the alleged conduct.
Posted on 2/19/26 at 7:42 pm to Crackerj
quote:
Something about this story isn’t passing the smell test.
Posted on 2/19/26 at 7:45 pm to Will Cover
If ever there was a match between the avatar and the thread title...
Posted on 2/19/26 at 7:54 pm to Will Cover
This is supposedly the law they are using.
quote:
According to Ohio Revised Code 2907.08, “No person, for the purpose of sexually arousing or gratifying the person’s self, shall commit trespass or otherwise surreptitiously invade the privacy of another, to spy or eavesdrop upon another.”
Posted on 2/19/26 at 7:59 pm to dallastigers
There's more to it than that, I posted it above.
But all of it is based on viewing someone not sniffing an article of their clothing.
He also would have needed to be trespassing or surreptitiously lurking in his own house. Definitely seems very shaky to me.
But all of it is based on viewing someone not sniffing an article of their clothing.
He also would have needed to be trespassing or surreptitiously lurking in his own house. Definitely seems very shaky to me.
This post was edited on 2/19/26 at 8:01 pm
Posted on 2/19/26 at 8:30 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
Not sure which one they charged this guy under. They all seem like a stretch for the alleged conduct.
I also don’t think the law was written for this exact situation.
quote:https://www.richlandsource.com/2026/02/19/bond-set-at-10k-for-butler-mayor-charged-with-two-counts-of-voyeurism/
The alleged offenses involve the 48-year-old Dingus sniffing the previously worn underwear of a minor relative in his care. Both instances were recorded by a small video camera, according to a Richland County Sheriff’s Office report.
What he did was pathetic, but it looks like they couldn’t find anything better to charge him with. Assuming it was his home and depending on exact kind of relative she is and why she is there they will have to proof he had no business being in the room at all and then show how sniffing fits spying or eavesdropping, viewing private areas of the person, or videotaping or otherwise recording her underwear worn (worn would have to include being worn in the past not just mean what she was wearing when videoed).
Is it going to be stretched to recording memories of the underwear in his mind??
Also depending on the nature of their relationship and being under his care he might have expectations of privacy in his own home.
The above paragraph states she is a minor, and I am surprised that they could not find a crime dealing with a minor on this rather than charge with a voyeurism statue.
Posted on 2/19/26 at 8:39 pm to dallastigers
They would have also charged him with trespassing.
…if he wasn’t trespassing, God help any dude that walks into Victoria’s Secret with prurient intentions.
This is one of those situations where you can escape the charges but not the process.
…if he wasn’t trespassing, God help any dude that walks into Victoria’s Secret with prurient intentions.
This is one of those situations where you can escape the charges but not the process.
Posted on 2/19/26 at 8:42 pm to Hangit
quote:
smelling her worn underwear, and touching his groin area
Posted on 2/19/26 at 8:45 pm to This GUN for HIRE
Only the man who has never sniffed girls underwear, should be allowed to comment here
a biblical reference, something about casting the first stone
a biblical reference, something about casting the first stone
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News