- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Mass shooting on Vegas Strip discussion
Posted on 10/5/17 at 1:32 pm to Mr. Hangover
Posted on 10/5/17 at 1:32 pm to Mr. Hangover
Have they got any decent info out yet on motive?
0
Posted on 10/5/17 at 1:33 pm to When in Rome
Why is everyone so caught up on a damn receipt in the first place???
Internet sleuths are desperate for information, until then, they use whatever snippets of info they have to concoct crazy arse scenarios with a few loose ends...
Internet sleuths are desperate for information, until then, they use whatever snippets of info they have to concoct crazy arse scenarios with a few loose ends...
Posted on 10/5/17 at 1:33 pm to momentoftruth87
quote:
How does one order room service if they aren't there???
then again, check the room on the 27th. Who said he had to check in that day if he was supposedly seen with another woman. Maybe she held the room till the 27th, and then it was his on the 28th
Posted on 10/5/17 at 1:34 pm to momentoftruth87
Why isn't there a full timestamp on the receipt? Just the date.....
I think this is a photoshop job personally.
I think this is a photoshop job personally.
Posted on 10/5/17 at 1:35 pm to Mr. Hangover
Because the receipt is sketchy and shouldn't be trusted as evidence. 
Posted on 10/5/17 at 1:36 pm to Black
quote:
then again, check the room on the 27th. Who said he had to check in that day if he was supposedly seen with another woman. Maybe she held the room till the 27th, and then it was his on the 28th
Well they've said clearly he checked in on the 28th, so him having a receipt for that same room on the 27th would definitely be fishy. I just don't think it is true. Every receipt I have ever gotten from a hotel has a time stamp, not just the date.
Posted on 10/5/17 at 1:37 pm to When in Rome
quote:It actually does. Look at the larger pic on previous page. Bottom right it says "room charge" 94.33. Most of the pics have the bottom line cut off and you only see the "total" 84.33 line. It's weird the way the 10.00 tip is itemized just above the 84.33 total line but isn't actually calculated in the 84.33. That's where the confusion comes in imo.
still doesn't add up correctly, as a person below me mentioned.
This post was edited on 10/5/17 at 1:40 pm
Posted on 10/5/17 at 1:38 pm to The Mick
He checked in with Danley's ID as well. So the hotel would have had 2 guests in the system no matter what.
Posted on 10/5/17 at 1:38 pm to The Mick
quote:Did not see that. Thanks for pointing that out.
Look at the larger pic on previous page. Bottom right it says "room charge total" 94.33. Most of the pics have the bottom line cut off and you only see the "total" 84.33 line.
Posted on 10/5/17 at 1:38 pm to Happygilmore
quote:
then 9.00 is missing.
big dummy, the $9.90 is what i meant, that's what was throwing the cents off. $10 is broken out separate as its a tip.
Posted on 10/5/17 at 1:39 pm to Mr. Hangover
Because legit facts say he wasn't there in the room until the 28th. If he was in the room on the 27th why wasn't it said and what do they know about from him entering the property until his expiration?
If not Photoshopped this NEEDS to be explained. It's missing time, and most importantly how does evidence say he was there when he wasn't until the next day?
If not Photoshopped this NEEDS to be explained. It's missing time, and most importantly how does evidence say he was there when he wasn't until the next day?
Posted on 10/5/17 at 1:39 pm to The Mick
quote:
It is 10 cents off.
That's it, they need to put a BOLO out for the 10 cents. It's obvious the 10 cents is a co conspirator. Need to get those 10 cents off the streets now, before someone else gets shortchanged.
Posted on 10/5/17 at 1:41 pm to When in Rome
So who leaked this receipt? There are too many problems with it to be believe that it is real.
I would like to know more about the woman.
I would like to know more about the woman.
Posted on 10/5/17 at 1:41 pm to Chad504boy
This is starting to read like one of those "What's the Correct Answer to This Math Problem?" threads.
Posted on 10/5/17 at 1:42 pm to Tiger in NY
quote:Is it possible he ate some shite in the restaurant or bar just before midnight and had it charged to his room he was about to check into?
Well they've said clearly he checked in on the 28th, so him having a receipt for that same room on the 27th would definitely be fishy. I just don't think it is true. Every receipt I have ever gotten from a hotel has a time stamp, not just the date.
No idea just trying to cloud the picture even more.Posted on 10/5/17 at 1:42 pm to The Mick
quote:
It actually does. Look at the larger pic on previous page. Bottom right it says "room charge" 94.33. Most of the pics have the bottom line cut off and you only see the "total" 84.33 line. It's weird the way the 10.00 tip is itemized just above the 84.33 total line but isn't actually calculated in the 84.33. That's where the confusion comes in imo.
That's because it is someone's bullshite attempt at a photoshop job. The numbers add up wrong (guy was an accountant and numbers guy), and they didn't put a damned timestamp on there (which every food service receipt in the US probably has).
Posted on 10/5/17 at 1:42 pm to TigerFred
quote:
I would like to know more about the woman.
Me too.
That receipt thing is nonsense.
Posted on 10/5/17 at 1:42 pm to momentoftruth87
quote:
If he was in the room on the 27th why wasn't it said
bc they are still trying to locate this other woman
quote:
most importantly how does evidence say he was there when he wasn't until the next day?
other woman checked in to hold the room so no one else would get it and have it into the weekend and throwing off his timeline to set up.
other woman goes into crowd telling them they all gonna die and disappears
Posted on 10/5/17 at 1:43 pm to TigerFred
Maybe this has been explained already. The top of the receipt says IRD_MDB. Is there a restaurant that has a name like that in the hotel? I only ask because in looking up receipts from other restaurants around Vegas, they all have the full name of the restaurant listed at the top. Idk, I just think the receipt is fake and am bored.
Apparently it means "In-Room Dining" after googling it.
Apparently it means "In-Room Dining" after googling it.
This post was edited on 10/5/17 at 1:44 pm
Posted on 10/5/17 at 1:44 pm to When in Rome
quote:
IRD_MDB
in room dining mandalay bay
Page 269 of 398
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News