- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Marksville City Marshals......Breaking two officers charged with murder
Posted on 11/4/15 at 3:19 pm to Darth_Vader
Posted on 11/4/15 at 3:19 pm to Darth_Vader
What about the possibility of a ricochet, or a bullet that passed through the intended target?
Are those impossible?
Are those impossible?
2
Posted on 11/4/15 at 3:19 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
Well if they didn't shoot wildly, the only other possibility is they shot deliberately. So are you saying they meant to shoot the child?
There are more possibilities than that. You assume the presence of the child was known.
You've also already stated to you, that's no excuse. I have no interest trying to change your mind. But please continue with the insults. They really bolster your position.
Posted on 11/4/15 at 3:19 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:Not true at all.
the only other possibility is they shot deliberately
May the child RIP.
Posted on 11/4/15 at 3:19 pm to Croacka
quote:
What about the possibility of a ricochet, or a bullet that passed through the intended target?
Are those impossible?
2 possibilities only. Darth said so!
Posted on 11/4/15 at 3:20 pm to bayourougebengal
quote:
You're right but it's also a highly believable story.
Looks like he backed into a car trying to get away. Wonder what his warrant was for?
Posted on 11/4/15 at 3:20 pm to SabiDojo
quote:
Obviously the officers were able to sidestep the vehicle.
You sure about this? Was there room to move? Was there time to move? What I'm getting at is you KNOW jack shite.
Posted on 11/4/15 at 3:20 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
I'm just kind of fascinated by the cops can never do anything right crowd. You have people in this thread that would prefer cops die checking for the incredibly unlikely innocent person in a car involved in a pursuit. That's taking cop hate a bit far.
No, I don't want cops to die. What I do want is before they discharge their weapons, they take aim at their target and make sure they've got a clean shot. They're supposed to be trained to do this.
Posted on 11/4/15 at 3:21 pm to bayourougebengal
What was the pursuit over?
Posted on 11/4/15 at 3:21 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
I'm just kind of fascinated by the cops can never do anything right crowd.
I'm in the "lets not always give officers the benefit of the doubt" crowd, which I see as the sensible reaction to the much more powerful crowd of LEOs, DAs, and judges in service of the thin blue line.
Posted on 11/4/15 at 3:21 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
What I do want is before they discharge their weapons, they take aim at their target and make sure they've got a clean shot. They're supposed to be trained to do this.
And you don't know that they didn't. You think you do though. You do realize training doesn't equal 100% perfect accuracy, right?
Posted on 11/4/15 at 3:21 pm to Croacka
quote:
What about the possibility of a ricochet, or a bullet that passed through the intended target?
Are those impossible?
Child was hit multiple times.
Posted on 11/4/15 at 3:22 pm to uway
I will always give the initial benefit of the doubt to the officers over the criminals
But I will also allow things to shake out before I make a final decision
But I will also allow things to shake out before I make a final decision
Posted on 11/4/15 at 3:22 pm to uway
quote:
I'm in the "lets not always give officers the benefit of the doubt" crowd
I don't. In this case, I don't see any reason to not give it though. Not without more actual facts.
Posted on 11/4/15 at 3:24 pm to Strannix
They were issuing a warrant, which does make the situation look worse, for all parties
If he had just accepted the warrant, his child would be alive.
I'm not sure I agree that serving a warrant warranted a pursuit, but I don't know what the warrant was for.
If he had just accepted the warrant, his child would be alive.
I'm not sure I agree that serving a warrant warranted a pursuit, but I don't know what the warrant was for.
Posted on 11/4/15 at 3:24 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:quote:
What about the possibility of a ricochet, or a bullet that passed through the intended target?
Are those impossible?
Child was hit multiple times.
And? Are you saying it's impossible for multiple ricochets or pass throughs to happen?
Posted on 11/4/15 at 3:24 pm to bayourougebengal
quote:
You sure about this? Was there room to move? Was there time to move? What I'm getting at is you KNOW jack shite.
I thought someone had said earlier that they had sidestepped. If not the case, I retract my statement.
Posted on 11/4/15 at 3:24 pm to Strannix
quote:
What was the pursuit over?
Trying to serve the POS a warrant. That's been said numerous times in this thread.
Posted on 11/4/15 at 3:25 pm to SabiDojo
quote:
I thought someone had said earlier that they had sidestepped. If not the case, I retract my statement.
And that's where you can get in trouble. OP has said all sorts of stuff with nothing to back it up, and has littered it through several pages.
Posted on 11/4/15 at 3:25 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
There are more possibilities than that. You assume the presence of the child was known.
You've also already stated to you, that's no excuse. I have no interest trying to change your mind. But please continue with the insults. They really bolster your position.
Wrong. I assume the child was unknown and they fired wildly at the car in an irresponsible manner.
Posted on 11/4/15 at 3:26 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
Wrong. I assume the child was unknown and they fired wildly at the car in an irresponsible manner.
So you still assume wildly. Thank you for continuing repeat yourself. That still doesn't make your assumption correct or limit the amount of possibilities.
Page 10 of 54
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News