re: Many Worlds Theory - Can Someone Please Explain This shite?

quote:

---

It’s based on the theoretical concept of a “speed force.”

---

Much akin to the theoretical concept of monkeys flying out of my arse.

Well, the universe is big, so whatever a basement-dwelling sci-fi nerd can dream up has already come to pass...ad infinitum.

Ergo my “monkeys flying out of my arse - universe” theory.

quote:

---

Please educate me.

---

Stop listening to stupid shite like that.

Smoke some dope, listen to some Pink Floyd, chill out and shut the frick up.


No one needs all the answers to everything. You'll find out someday or you won't.

We don’t even understand the human body and we can dissect it and look at it under a microscope. Humans are usually wrong about that which is observable.

I couldn’t be less interested in what someone thinks could possibly be happening in a parallel universe that can’t be observed or verified. But if it keeps the pseudo-intellectuals and college kids entertained then I guess there is some utility in an otherwise futile exercise.

quote:

---

It’s based on the theoretical concept of a “speed force.” Basically, let’s say a person can reach a speed so fast, and with so much force, that this reality is literally torn (since space-time is a square circle). When this reality we are in (or which we perceive ourselves in) is torn in the slightest, we would be able to glimpse into the paradigm of an adjacent reality heretofore never seen in this which we live. Now turn that glimpse into actual entry. The person enters a new paradigm reality, a new space-time which was always there but never seen. The tear will instantly close, preserving the necessary square circle. Thus, both realities are now changed. This could happen infinite times—creating “Many Worlds”.

Hope that helps.

---

Why would the reality tear if a person goes to fast?

First read about this fella Schrödinger’s cat: Wiki

Then consider that every single event. Every decision you make, every which way a ball could bounce, etc. Is like Schrödinger’s cat except the universe splits into two every time an event takes place representing every possible outcome.

This leads to an infinite number of universes with every possible outcome

I personally think it’s garbage. But it’s a decent explanation to the fine tuning argument, which is another topic entirely

Wow! Don't you feel a little bit more now like you do than before you first got here?

Wanted to make that much longer and hop to the Many Words Theory.

The Many Worlds Theory is pop science. Proponents like Sean Carroll use it and other off-the-wall ideas to sell books, lure listeners to their podcasts, etc. It isn’t serious science.

4th dimensional beings n shite