- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Man Demonstrates A Big Flaw In 911's Jet Fuel Argument
Posted on 12/17/15 at 1:08 pm to TX Tiger
Posted on 12/17/15 at 1:08 pm to TX Tiger
I haven't read through this thread, but has TX Tiger referred to us as "sheeple" yet? Or said something along the lines of "your government loves you and wants what's best for you?"
Posted on 12/17/15 at 1:23 pm to LSU_Cubs
quote:I'll try to make this as brief as possible.
Yes, not believing liars makes me an idiot. Brilliant.
Who do you believe?
Russia had already tried to capture Afghanistan and we fought with the terrorists to boot them out. Then we went in to take what Russia was after - trillions in untapped natural resources; billions(/trillions) in poppies; a central bank; and one of the many puppets in the region that had gone rogue, forming an oil bourse that threatened the dollar.
Afghanistan, and subsequently Iraq, were used as the base to infiltrate the Middle East and remove the rogue puppets (Hussein, Qaddafi, Assad, etc.) thus saving our currency while bringing those banks in line with the international banking cabal.
However, the American people would never back such a plan unless something happened to move them in that direction.
The PNAC document, produced by the leading neocons of the day, mapped out the strategy to remain the world's superpower. In it was described the tedious task of moving the American people towards accepting such an agenda.
It said that the process would be a long one, and I quote, "absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor."
A year later, 9/11 happened and the agenda was kicked off.
Who did it and how they did it, we'll probably never know, but that's one hell of a coincidence. I believe that powerful globalists are far more calculating than lucky.
That's it in a nutshell.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 1:42 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
I'll try to make this as brief as possible.
That's cool.
Mujahideen, Omar, bin Laden, Reagan Doctrine, money, power, blah blah blah. I get that.
You never answered my question though.
Who do you believe? Who do you believe to make you feel that this is the way it happened?
Posted on 12/17/15 at 1:46 pm to TX Tiger
Your paranoid delusions are worse than I thought.
Seek help NOW before you hurt yourself of someone else.
Seek help NOW before you hurt yourself of someone else.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 1:54 pm to LSURussian
This is getting repetitive.
Are we ready to move on to chem-trails?
Are we ready to move on to chem-trails?
Posted on 12/17/15 at 1:55 pm to LSURussian
quote:I've already asked you who you're seeing. But you won't answer. I get the feeling you're not as concerned about me as you let on.
Your paranoid delusions are worse than I thought.
Seek help NOW before you hurt yourself of someone else.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 1:56 pm to TX Tiger
You typed all of that while managing to say absolutely nothing. All you did was deflect. Good job. 
Posted on 12/17/15 at 1:56 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
Russia had already tried to capture Afghanistan and we fought with the terrorists to boot them out.
They weren't terrorists when we were helping them
Posted on 12/17/15 at 1:58 pm to TX Tiger
quote:I don't read all of your posts so I missed that one. I've never needed counseling. YOU DO.
I've already asked you who you're seeing. But you won't answer.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 2:04 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
t's funny because you were using it as a gotcha moment, when in fact there was a time when most people believed it, so it was true, even though it wasn't.
You're too stupid to see the irony, but as usual the level of ignorance on TD is highly entertaining.
Thank you for that.
That's some twisted arse logic man.
***insert mind blown gif***
Posted on 12/17/15 at 2:06 pm to TX Tiger
The USSR was in Afghanistan to prop up their puppet state. Whether or not they extracted billions or trillions of dollars (rubles?) in poppies and minerals, I can't say.
The U.S., through the CIA and Pakistani ISS, got involved with the "terrorists" strictly to frick with the Soviets. The typical U.S. citizen didn't give a shite about Afghanistan in the mid/late '70s and probably couldn't find it on a map with three chances. D.C. didn't care either, but saw an opportunity to give the USSR a little payback for supporting North Vietnam. Of course, the "terrorists" weren't terrorists at the time, because we were funding and arming them. They were "freedom fighters" and they were fighting as our proxies.
Charlie Wilson's War is an entertaining book and gives a good overview of how a Congressman from Texas was able to escalate a foreign conflict beyond what the CIA had originally intended. Ghost Wars is a more scholarly review, covering the time period from the Soviet invasion up until 9/11.
The U.S., through the CIA and Pakistani ISS, got involved with the "terrorists" strictly to frick with the Soviets. The typical U.S. citizen didn't give a shite about Afghanistan in the mid/late '70s and probably couldn't find it on a map with three chances. D.C. didn't care either, but saw an opportunity to give the USSR a little payback for supporting North Vietnam. Of course, the "terrorists" weren't terrorists at the time, because we were funding and arming them. They were "freedom fighters" and they were fighting as our proxies.
Charlie Wilson's War is an entertaining book and gives a good overview of how a Congressman from Texas was able to escalate a foreign conflict beyond what the CIA had originally intended. Ghost Wars is a more scholarly review, covering the time period from the Soviet invasion up until 9/11.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 2:11 pm to LSU_Cubs
quote:It's not really a who, but rather a what.
You never answered my question though.
Who do you believe? Who do you believe to make you feel that this is the way it happened?
I was all gung ho, bought the car flag, went to the rallies, blah, blah, blah, right after 9/11. I was right there cheering us on as we went to take care of the bad guys.
But then a funny thing happened. Months began to go by and the greatest and most well-funded military in the history of man, couldn't defeat a bunch of thugs.
As the months continued to roll by, it became clear that we weren't over there to kill bad guys, or we'd have already accomplished our goal and been back home by now. It was Vietnam Part 2. Fool me once shame on you; fool me twice shame on me.
That's when I started doing my research. What I found was very ugly, very disappointing, and every bit as angering as 9/11.
As for specific sites (if this is what you're asking) there are too many to list. I just went down the rabbit hole - hard. I would literally research 4-5 hours a day four or five days a week. This went on for years.
Now granted, 99% of what's out there is garbage. But there was enough out there for anyone dedicated enough to search for it to connect some dots.
Again, if you start with the question, "who benefits" instead of hating/fearing Muslims, you're already further along than most.
I don't know if that answers your question or not.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 2:11 pm to Topwater Trout
quote:
Russia had already tried to capture Afghanistan and we fought with the terrorists to boot them out.
They weren't terrorists when we were helping them
--------------------------------------------------------------
That's a matter of semantics. Did the British consider the Irgun to be terrorists when they were raising hell in the Palestinian Mandate? Were they terrorists when they bombed the King David Hotel?
Russia had already tried to capture Afghanistan and we fought with the terrorists to boot them out.
They weren't terrorists when we were helping them
--------------------------------------------------------------
That's a matter of semantics. Did the British consider the Irgun to be terrorists when they were raising hell in the Palestinian Mandate? Were they terrorists when they bombed the King David Hotel?
Posted on 12/17/15 at 2:15 pm to LSURussian
quote:Well, you may have a point. I mean look how many hours of my life I waste talking to you.
I've already asked you who you're seeing. But you won't answer.
I don't read all of your posts so I missed that one. I've never needed counseling. YOU DO.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 2:16 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
I don't know if that answers your question or not.
We are getting closer, I guess.
I just simply want to know who and what you trust as factual information.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 2:16 pm to Topwater Trout
quote:
Russia had already tried to capture Afghanistan and we fought with the terrorists to boot them out.
They weren't terrorists when we were helping them
Posted on 12/17/15 at 2:22 pm to White Roach
quote:We have spent 14 years (and counting), gone hopelessly into debt, and lost thousands of lives to "give the USSR a little payback?"
The typical U.S. citizen didn't give a shite about Afghanistan in the mid/late '70s and probably couldn't find it on a map with three chances. D.C. didn't care either, but saw an opportunity to give the USSR a little payback for supporting North Vietnam.
Umm, no.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 2:27 pm to LSU_Cubs
quote:I trust no one completely. I mostly trust those I've spoken with or read about who were actually there and have little to gain by an agenda.
I don't know if that answers your question or not.
We are getting closer, I guess.
I just simply want to know who and what you trust as factual information.
Several of them lost their jobs and were blackballed for speaking out. I trust them far more than someone who has trillions to gain by convincing me of their agenda (see man made global warming, organized religion, etc.).
Posted on 12/17/15 at 2:31 pm to TX Tiger
I agree with everything you said TX Tiger so keep preaching. Some of these folks forgot this is how you win Monopoly... By owning and controlling everything.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 2:33 pm to Shepherd88
quote:
By owning and controlling everything.
who owns and controls everything?
Popular
Back to top



0




