- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/18/16 at 8:53 am to 19
quote:
Banging a chick that was puking earlier (that's not trashy at all) doesn't help his "consensual" defense. With his nasty arse.
I guess he wasn't drunk also? She doesn't remember the act right? Well then how can she say it wasn't consensual?
Posted on 1/18/16 at 8:55 am to JodyPlauche
Except I seriously doubt she was "forced" into anything.
A couple of college kids who had been having sex got drunk and had sex again, and now for her own reasons she wants to punish the guy so she claims rape.
How many times have we seen this?
A couple of college kids who had been having sex got drunk and had sex again, and now for her own reasons she wants to punish the guy so she claims rape.
How many times have we seen this?
This post was edited on 1/18/16 at 8:58 am
Posted on 1/18/16 at 9:01 am to fr33manator
Almost to the point you wanna have the girls sign consent forms and non disclosure agreements. This buyer's remorse crap is unsettling to say to least, women that do that are despicable.
I will say, legit rapes are crimes against humanity, should be prosecuted to the fullest...but girls making false claims make it harder fur the real victims. It's infuriating, really.
Some of these girls can't even touch a guy for years after w/out some PTSD flashback, f ing horrible
I will say, legit rapes are crimes against humanity, should be prosecuted to the fullest...but girls making false claims make it harder fur the real victims. It's infuriating, really.
Some of these girls can't even touch a guy for years after w/out some PTSD flashback, f ing horrible
Posted on 1/18/16 at 9:08 am to Topwater Trout
quote:If she was black out drunk and vomiting then she was incapacitated and unable to consent. I think in Louisiana law, the standard for "simple rape" is that it's rape if the assailant knew or should have known of the victim's incapacitation and inability to understand or resist the sexual act. If he saw her so drunk that she was vomiting then yeah I think he should have known she was at the point of being unable to consent.
I guess he wasn't drunk also? She doesn't remember the act right? Well then how can she say it wasn't consensual?
This post was edited on 1/18/16 at 9:11 am
Posted on 1/18/16 at 9:11 am to Hog on the Hill
Was he able to consent? Why is only one party responsible.
Some of y'all act like you don't think drunk chicks are capable of begging for dick. If you want equality then you can't have a drunk guy wholly responsible but a drunk chick a victim no matter what.
Some of y'all act like you don't think drunk chicks are capable of begging for dick. If you want equality then you can't have a drunk guy wholly responsible but a drunk chick a victim no matter what.
Posted on 1/18/16 at 9:11 am to Hog on the Hill
Yeah, if this guy was coherent or not even drunk at all and this chick was vomiting yet he still had sex with her that is rape.
Posted on 1/18/16 at 9:14 am to fr33manator
quote:
Was he able to consent?
Sorry fr33man but I have to disagree. No guy is having sex blackout drunk, for multiple biological reasons. On the other hand, a girl blackout drunk and immobile can easily be taken advantage of. These are not even remotely comparable from a physical standpoint.
Posted on 1/18/16 at 9:16 am to Hog on the Hill
quote:
If she was black out drunk and vomiting then she was incapacitated and unable to consent. I think in Louisiana law, the standard for "simple rape" is that it's rape if the assailant knew or should have known of the victim's incapacitation and inability to understand or resist the sexual act. If he saw her so drunk that she was vomiting then yeah I think he should have known she was at the point of being unable to consent
but what if he was as drunk as she was?
Posted on 1/18/16 at 9:18 am to Topwater Trout
And if he wasn't?
Posted on 1/18/16 at 9:19 am to fr33manator
quote:IMO the guy shouldn't be convicted if it's just he said/she said and there's no physical evidence or eyewitness testimony to indicate that the girl is telling the truth while the guy is lying. If all we have are what these two say happened, and their stories remain consistent, then I think you have to just drop the case.
Was he able to consent? Why is only one party responsible.
Some of y'all act like you don't think drunk chicks are capable of begging for dick. If you want equality then you can't have a drunk guy wholly responsible but a drunk chick a victim no matter what.
And I use the standard that the Louisiana law spells out--if the alleged assailant knew or should have known that the victim was incapacitated beyond his or her ability to resist or understand the sexual act, then it's a crime.
If that can't be determined (that the alleged assailant knew or should have known) then it may have still been a crime, but there's no way to know.
Posted on 1/18/16 at 9:20 am to Hog on the Hill
quote:Ummm, what if he was shitfaced drunk puking too? Which is usually how it goes in college
If she was black out drunk and vomiting then she was incapacitated and unable to consent. I think in Louisiana law, the standard for "simple rape" is that it's rape if the assailant knew or should have known of the victim's incapacitation and inability to understand or resist the sexual act. If he saw her so drunk that she was vomiting then yeah I think he should have known she was at the point of being unable to consent.
Posted on 1/18/16 at 9:22 am to lsupride87
quote:
Ummm, what if he was shitfaced drunk puking too?
doesn't give you legal permission to commit crimes.
Posted on 1/18/16 at 9:23 am to Chad504boy
quote:Wouldnt they both be committing crimes then?
doesn't give you legal permission to commit crimes.
Posted on 1/18/16 at 9:23 am to lsupride87
quote:I've never been able to have sex if I'm shitfaced drunk puking and blacking out. That doesn't mean he wasn't able to, and I'd never convict a guy by making that assumption. But it makes me wonder.
Ummm, what if he was shitfaced drunk puking too? Which is usually how it goes in college
Frankly, I'd need to hear the versions of events as each person remembers them, and find out how consistent those stories stay over repeated interviews. What's published in that article is not enough, so we're left chasing hypotheticals in this thread.
I definitely wouldn't convict the guy based on what was in that article. It's nowhere near enough IMO.
Posted on 1/18/16 at 9:24 am to lsupride87
quote:no
Wouldnt they both be committing crimes then?
Posted on 1/18/16 at 9:24 am to Hog on the Hill
quote:Wow. Glad I wasnt you in college
I've never been able to have sex if I'm shitfaced drunk puking and blacking out
Posted on 1/18/16 at 9:24 am to lsupride87
Like I said, biology doesn't allow for that. Do I really have to type it out?
Posted on 1/18/16 at 9:25 am to Hog on the Hill
quote:So a woman can have sex with a non-consenting male?
no
Posted on 1/18/16 at 9:25 am to Oates Mustache
quote:bullshite. Absolute bullshite. Maybe not your biology
Like I said, biology doesn't allow for that.
Page 5 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News