re: Making A Murder O-T Lounge Thread

Two things:


Did they ever address where the needle sized hole in the cap of the blood tube came from?


Brendan Dassey's confession was painful how shitty they manipulated him.

quote:

---

Brendan Dassey's confession was painful how shitty they manipulated him.

---

I dont know how those prosecutors could sleep at night. They knew they had a shite for brains kid. My heart broke when you would hear him ask if he's going to be let go to turn in a school project. Does that sound like the mindset of a killer? Worried about a school project.

Yeah, the thing he was most disappointed about was missing Wrestlemania. They practically put the words in his mouth in that confession.

I lost interest in the second episode. Unlike the Adnan Syed case, which I am still obsessing over.

quote:

---

meh, some posters have made it pretty clear that they wouldn't have found him guilty but do believe he did it.

There are many reasons to believe it, just not necessarily without a reasonable doubt.

As for the remainder of your post, why isn't it possible for some of the evidence to be legit and other pieces planted?

---

So if you think it's reasonable to doubt that Avery is guilty, why do you make the leap from presumption of his innocence to believing that he is guilty?

If you believe some of the evidence is planted, why would you assume that some of the evidence is legit? You're being exceedingly vague here--what evidence do you believe was planted, and what evidence do you believe is legit? What evidence links Avery to the murder and could not have been planted? And if the police thought that the case against him was so weak that they needed to plant evidence to ensure his conviction, shouldn't that signal to you that maybe there actually isn't a good reason to believe he's guilty?

I have a feeling you're hesitant to be specific because you aren't actually sure yourself. You simply believe that he is guilty and you're being dishonest with yourself about how tenuous that belief is. If you really have a good reason to believe he's guilty, then let's hear it. Otherwise, take some time to yourself and reconsider your belief.

quote:

---

Avery was convicted on a timeline that involved her being killed in the garage and Dassey was convicted on a timeline that her being killed in the trailer. Two convictions involving the same crime but both trails are based on two different timelines.

---

Thank you and there was no blood in either murder area

quote:

---

I lost interest in the second episode. Unlike the Adnan Syed case, which I am still obsessing over.

---

This case is far more compelling than Adnan's.

"Beyond a reasonable doubt"

"Presumed innocent until PROVEN guilty"

How any jury can get beyond those two supposed guarantees of our justice system and find these men guilty (especially Brendan) is scary as hell to me.

Someone posted you'll be fine if you're not poor. Hmmm...

In this case they are not rich, but Steve used a $400,000 settlement to defend himself and still lost. In a nation where it's been reported less than 50% of ppl have one thousand in savings, 400k should be enough to buy a damn good defense.

This case proves what a farce the "justice" system has become. Even if he is guilty, not one post in this thread, nor evidence presented at trial has proven it beyond a doubt.

And what of judges who basically work as prosecutors in robes? It's disgusting.

For the record, the original thread title spoiled it for me. Thanks, butthole.

You need to watch the documentary before commenting. You just don't understand and you're speaking from a position of ignorance.