Started By
Message

re: Madison Brooks Rape Trial- Its been over 2 years

Posted on 3/28/25 at 11:28 am to
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
176323 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 11:28 am to
quote:


Her having sex the night before seems very relevant



is the raper raping prior to the rape of madison brooks also relevant to the trial?
Posted by HeadCall
Member since Feb 2025
5715 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 11:29 am to
quote:

is the raper raping prior to the rape of madison brooks also relevant to the trial?


Alleged raping
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
46910 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 11:30 am to
quote:


Her having sex the night before seems very relevant

how so?
Posted by HeadCall
Member since Feb 2025
5715 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 11:35 am to
quote:

how so?


If the prosecution is going to present evidence that her anal fissures were due to the alleged rape then it would seem relevant that she had rough butt sex with someone else less than 24 hours prior.
Posted by AlwysATgr
Member since Apr 2008
20235 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 11:58 am to
quote:

the prosecution is going to present evidence that her anal fissures were due to the alleged rape then it would seem relevant that she had rough butt sex with someone else less than 24 hours prior.


This presuppses that it was consensual and her BAC, disorientation, and wandering out into an oncoming car are all irrelevant. And it explains why the let her out at 2AM in 33F temps when there were multiple noble alternatives readily available.
Posted by HeadCall
Member since Feb 2025
5715 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

And it explains why the let her out at 2AM in 33F temps when there were multiple noble alternatives readily available.


There’s video of her demanding to be let out
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
148603 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

when there were multiple noble alternatives readily available.
Posted by JDPndahizzy
JDP
Member since Nov 2013
6918 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 12:01 pm to
It's going to be a very interesting trial.
Posted by HeadCall
Member since Feb 2025
5715 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 12:02 pm to
Supposedly there’s video of the entire encounter. It’s all going to come down to that IMO.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
468041 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

This presuppses that it was consensual and her BAC, disorientation, and wandering out into an oncoming car are all irrelevant.


If there isn't evidence of sex, or if the argument is that sex didn't actually happen, it doesn't presuppose that.

The prosecution is going to use the trauma to argue sex occurred. Now the defense can't give alternate explanations .

For anyone who believes in false allegations of rape (not saying that specifically applies here, I'm speaking generally), this should be very worrisome.
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
46910 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

If the prosecution is going to present evidence that her anal fissures were due to the alleged rape then it would seem relevant that she had rough butt sex with someone else less than 24 hours prior.
if there is evidence that she then had rough butt sex in that vehicle, and there is evidence that it was rape, then the previous nights encounter is irrelevant. and if there is not evidence that there was rape in that vehicle, then the entire case is irrelevant

so again, how is the the previous nights encounter relevant if there was rape in that vehicle. having sex on night one does not absolve the rape on night two
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
468041 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

so again, how is the the previous nights encounter relevant if there was rape in that vehicle.

The lack of DNA evidence opens up possible arguments about what exact sex acts occurred. Unless the videos show this in detail, there is avenue for reasonable doubt.
Posted by HeadCall
Member since Feb 2025
5715 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

so again, how is the the previous nights encounter relevant if there was rape in that vehicle. having sex on night one does not absolve the rape on night two


There’s previous encounter itself is irrelevant but if their only evidence of rape in the vehicle is anal fissures then the previous encounter is relevant. I’m not positive but I’m pretty sure I’ve read that there was no DNA evidence found on the victim from the accused.
This post was edited on 3/28/25 at 12:15 pm
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
46910 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

there is avenue for reasonable doubt
without the DNA evidence there will always be reasonable doubt, especially with the victim not able to testify
Posted by AlwysATgr
Member since Apr 2008
20235 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

There’s video of her demanding to be let out


And if someone demands out in the middle of Katy Freeway at 6PM do you just drop anchor and say here you go?
Posted by HeadCall
Member since Feb 2025
5715 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

And if someone demands out in the middle of Katy Freeway at 6PM do you just drop anchor and say here you go?


Nah, but that’s not what happened so…
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
176001 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

it would seem relevant that she had rough butt sex with someone else less than 24 hours prior.

Posted by ATrillionaire
Houston
Member since Sep 2008
2434 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

And if someone demands out in the middle of Katy Freeway at 6PM do you just drop anchor and say here you go?

I wouldn't based on fear for my own safety. If that wasn't a concern, I'd 100% drop anchor.
Posted by ryanlsu
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
1380 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 1:12 pm to
I had heard that they had filmed some of the sex and had admitted to it but said it was consensual. And that lines up better with the things the defense attorneys are leaking. If the defense is going to be that nobody had sex with her, why are they leaking that she grabbed somebody’s junk or that they asked her if she wanted to have sex and she said yes, or that she called one guy a fig for not having sex with her? Wouldn’t she be calling everybody in the car a fig if everyone refused to sleep with her?
Posted by LaLadyinTx
Cypress, TX
Member since Nov 2018
7141 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

Hopefully women start teaching their daughters that keeping this one thing to yourself and not giving it to every moron walking around creates a lot of value. When you dont you become less valuable and therefore less newsworthy and less of an obligation for law enforcement.


And the biggest part...don't get so wasted or drugged out you don't know what's going on. Anyone, male or female, who regularly puts themselves in that condition is subject to having all kinds of bad things happen to them. The Emergency Rooms are full of people who had things happen when drunk or high.
Jump to page
Page First 31 32 33 34 35
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 33 of 35Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram