- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Madison Brooks case: Defense's new motion
Posted on 10/18/23 at 12:10 pm to tigafan4life
Posted on 10/18/23 at 12:10 pm to tigafan4life
quote:
saying what
I don't know. My info came directly from a sorority member. She didn't share the details of the texts, just that it's "things you never want your parents to read" and she's heard there's more out there.
3
Posted on 10/18/23 at 12:13 pm to OldManRiver
As terrible as it sounds it appears to me a wise legal move.
Posted on 10/18/23 at 12:14 pm to OldManRiver
I think the defense is going to try and paint the picture that if Brooks would have made it home after the encounter, she would have woke up thinking nothing of the incident because it was in line with her normal life. She was a party girl that likes to get drunk and have promiscuous rough sex
That’s going to be their angle. And anything they can use to paint that story they will. And if posters hear know about text message rumors, the lawyers absolutely do
That’s going to be their angle. And anything they can use to paint that story they will. And if posters hear know about text message rumors, the lawyers absolutely do
Posted on 10/18/23 at 12:14 pm to lsupride87
quote:
It’s terrifying as a parent.
I've got 2 college aged daughters. After this incident, I sat them down and very strongly reiterated what I have always told them. If you drink in public, and allow yourself to become even somewhat incapacitated, you are ultimately putting your safety in someone else's hands. You better damn well be sure you can trust that person or persons. Because if not, there can be terrible consequences.
Posted on 10/18/23 at 12:15 pm to OldManRiver
Yep. With daughters, if they choose to drink and engage in sex with a stranger, they put their life in the strangers hands
With sons, if they drink and engage in sex with a stranger, they put their legal life and reputation in the strangers hands
Most people have fallen in one of the buckets above at some point, but it’s a game with risks
With sons, if they drink and engage in sex with a stranger, they put their legal life and reputation in the strangers hands
Most people have fallen in one of the buckets above at some point, but it’s a game with risks
This post was edited on 10/18/23 at 12:16 pm
Posted on 10/18/23 at 12:16 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
As terrible as it sounds it appears to me a wise legal move.
Of course it is, but it sucks for the girl’s family. Who among us would want their parents reading their message/post/search history?
Posted on 10/18/23 at 12:17 pm to lsupride87
quote:
With sons, if they drink and engage in sex with a stranger, they put their legal life and reputation in the strangers hands
Yep, parents need to have the same talk and expectations with their sons.
Posted on 10/18/23 at 12:25 pm to lsupride87
quote:
With sons, if they drink and engage in sex with a stranger, they put their legal life and reputation in the strangers hands
18 years….
Posted on 10/18/23 at 12:30 pm to tigafan4life
quote:
Did they get the dudes blood alcohol level to even argue that?
For the defense, it's better that they didn't. There's no proof he wasn't drunk..
Posted on 10/18/23 at 12:33 pm to Havoc
quote:
I could see some relevance if whether the intercourse actually occurred was at issue, but it isn’t
It is actually, now that no DNA evidence was found. One of the lawyers already started back-tracking his initial statements.
This post was edited on 10/18/23 at 12:46 pm
Posted on 10/18/23 at 12:40 pm to TheSadvocate
quote:
So they want to try and use the message history of a deceased girl to prove their clients aren't rapists? Who the frick are these people?
Defense lawyers that are doing their job
Posted on 10/18/23 at 12:48 pm to JDPndahizzy
I thought they admitted to having sex with her.
Posted on 10/18/23 at 12:53 pm to gsvar2004
quote:
I thought they admitted to having sex with her.
They did initially..Now the lawyer is saying (at least one of them) that his client was interrogated by a professional LE member and may have admitted to something under duress that he didn't do. (of course I'm paraphrasing here) I'll try to find that video
Posted on 10/18/23 at 1:00 pm to lsupride87
quote:
I think the defense is going to try and paint the picture that if Brooks would have made it home after the encounter, she would have woke up thinking nothing of the incident because it was in line with her normal life. She was a party girl that likes to get drunk and have promiscuous rough sex
I agree 100%.
Posted on 10/18/23 at 1:04 pm to elposter
quote:
Ugh the article said the DA vigorously opposed it.
Of course the DA opposed it. What is your point?
The family has no standing to argue or make motions in a criminal case. Only the DA can. SO your point about the Mother not opposing it in court is meaningless.
Posted on 10/18/23 at 1:07 pm to JDPndahizzy
Posted on 10/18/23 at 1:24 pm to Smeg
quote:
'm not saying it's there, but what if there are texts along the lines of: "Last weekend was great. I can't wait to get drunk and gangbanged again this weekend."
Are you frickingn serious?
Posted on 10/18/23 at 1:47 pm to Tshiz
Madison Brooks was of no legal consent able to consent to have sex to any of the assholes in the back of a car. It's amazing the lengths some of these posters are trying to go to in order to justify the behavior of the rapists. They admitted to all things. fricking driver knew what was going on was wrong. Madison Brooks was so fricking drunk she got ran over and killed in the middle of a fricking road supposedly by an uber driving 15 mph in a rain storm. That's not the behavior of someone not shite faced.
This post was edited on 10/18/23 at 1:48 pm
Posted on 10/18/23 at 2:11 pm to JDPndahizzy
quote:
motion to get Brooks' cellphone data from the 72 hours before the Louisiana State University student was allegedly raped and subsequently fatally struck by a car in Baton Rouge during the overnight hours of Jan. 14-15.
Wouldn’t it have to be a shorter time frame?
They couldn’t give exact time of sexual assault injury or rule out it could have happened before she was with these guys, but it seems like it was a shorter window than 72 hours.
This post was edited on 10/18/23 at 2:13 pm
Posted on 10/18/23 at 2:13 pm to dallastigers
Not a lawyer, but I stayed at a Holiday Inn Express.
I would think, just short of having known these “men” before that, that the limit on what is admissible is probably 24hrs to show her state of mind leading up to her death.
72 hours is a fricking fishing expedition to try and find info to drag the victim through the mud.
I would think, just short of having known these “men” before that, that the limit on what is admissible is probably 24hrs to show her state of mind leading up to her death.
72 hours is a fricking fishing expedition to try and find info to drag the victim through the mud.
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News