- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSU Law Professor writes article for NYT
Posted on 7/12/16 at 11:22 pm to Boagni Swamp
Posted on 7/12/16 at 11:22 pm to Boagni Swamp
That's complete bullshite re: "that's what he is saying."
The entire point of his article is stressing institutional factors over personal responsibility.
Everyone will agree that both are to blame, but he downplays personal responsibility to the point that it's clear he doesn't want to have an honest conversation.
The entire point of his article is stressing institutional factors over personal responsibility.
Everyone will agree that both are to blame, but he downplays personal responsibility to the point that it's clear he doesn't want to have an honest conversation.
Posted on 7/12/16 at 11:27 pm to John McClane
No no no no no.
The fact that y'all are talking past each other shows the problem. He says you can't bootstrap out of the problem through personal responsibility because institutional factors play a large role. Aha!, you immediately respond. He's denying personal responsibility, so I've stopped listening.
This is the problem. This is, in a microcosm, why people aren't communicating on this issue.
I'm done. I've tried to listen to everybody, from black militants to keyboard klansmen. I'll look for truth from anybody. But aint nobody else listening to anybody. I quit.
The fact that y'all are talking past each other shows the problem. He says you can't bootstrap out of the problem through personal responsibility because institutional factors play a large role. Aha!, you immediately respond. He's denying personal responsibility, so I've stopped listening.
This is the problem. This is, in a microcosm, why people aren't communicating on this issue.
I'm done. I've tried to listen to everybody, from black militants to keyboard klansmen. I'll look for truth from anybody. But aint nobody else listening to anybody. I quit.
This post was edited on 7/12/16 at 11:32 pm
Posted on 7/12/16 at 11:28 pm to Hoops
Couldn't have said it better myself.
Posted on 7/12/16 at 11:31 pm to kingbob
Was thinking the same thing
Posted on 7/12/16 at 11:36 pm to Boagni Swamp
Has it ever occurred to you that the lack of personal responsibility plays a role regarding the institutional factors?
Whether right or wrong, it does.
By marginalizing personal responsibility to the extent its role is negligible, he refuses to have an honest conversation as to the root causes the problems that are facing north of Baton Rouge.
It is clear we will never interpret that paragraph I quoted earlier the same way. However, I'm willing to bet the house that the New York Times would not have published his opinion if they read it the same way as you. This is a wedge piece. If you can't see that, so be it.
Whether right or wrong, it does.
By marginalizing personal responsibility to the extent its role is negligible, he refuses to have an honest conversation as to the root causes the problems that are facing north of Baton Rouge.
It is clear we will never interpret that paragraph I quoted earlier the same way. However, I'm willing to bet the house that the New York Times would not have published his opinion if they read it the same way as you. This is a wedge piece. If you can't see that, so be it.
Posted on 7/12/16 at 11:41 pm to bwm14
Is he related to the former federal judge Ralph Tyson?
That would certainly explain the borderline retardation.
That would certainly explain the borderline retardation.
Posted on 7/12/16 at 11:44 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
Do you know how many of those people lack reliable or even any transportation and rely on friends, neighbors, and whoever to hitch a ride?
LBJ's and his like-minded followers policies have almost created a pet class. My pets rely on me for food, drink, shelter, and rides to the vet. The big difference is that we do not reward pets for bad behavior.
The downward spiral is real. In the end, much will be said and nothing will be done. Stopping the insane inertia is seen as anti progress.
Posted on 7/12/16 at 11:46 pm to John McClane
quote:
ay. However, I'm willing to bet the house that the New York Times would not have published his opinion if they read it the same way as you. This is a wedge piece. If you can't see that, so be it.
Well, the NYT has published opinion articles calling out black on black crime. Just sayin'
Posted on 7/12/16 at 11:50 pm to Boagni Swamp
I think in context, Professor Tyson purposefully downplays the importance of individual choices and responsibility, but the reality of it is that he isn't altogether wrong, just as Bogani and McLane are saying.
More than anything, though, it is the cultural paradigm shift that has occurred in black American culture over the past fifty years, moving almost entirely away from two parent households that function independently to single parent households that function communally, that appears to be the root cause of most of the issues in black America today.
Communal rearing binds the individual to the community in far more dramatic ways so that, even if a child of promise manages to excel in education or otherwise, that child's desire to free himself from the community is near zero, despite that being in his best interest. The result is that the best and brightest, already too far behind their other counterparts in reading and math due to lack of parental involvement in early childhood education (see: single parent households), have very little hope of ever leaving the impoverished urban areas so frequently populated by black Americans.
This is a systemic problem not in the government or in the private sector, but in the family system and culture of modern black America. And this problem is far, far more difficult to root out than a policy shift or police education.
It is human nature for police to be afraid for their lives when they enter high crime areas where shootings are more common. The work that needs to be done is turning those areas into low crime areas, which comes with education, higher income and better prospects for success and financial security. To achieve this, certainly there must be a level of individual sense of drive and focus, as well as, perhaps, some policy changes to assist, but it largely comes down to a shift in the mentality of the black American culture and society to rise above the low expectations set for and by them, and to place a higher value on education and independence. There is no reason black Americans should not achieve at the levels of Asian and Middle Eastern Americans.
More than anything, though, it is the cultural paradigm shift that has occurred in black American culture over the past fifty years, moving almost entirely away from two parent households that function independently to single parent households that function communally, that appears to be the root cause of most of the issues in black America today.
Communal rearing binds the individual to the community in far more dramatic ways so that, even if a child of promise manages to excel in education or otherwise, that child's desire to free himself from the community is near zero, despite that being in his best interest. The result is that the best and brightest, already too far behind their other counterparts in reading and math due to lack of parental involvement in early childhood education (see: single parent households), have very little hope of ever leaving the impoverished urban areas so frequently populated by black Americans.
This is a systemic problem not in the government or in the private sector, but in the family system and culture of modern black America. And this problem is far, far more difficult to root out than a policy shift or police education.
It is human nature for police to be afraid for their lives when they enter high crime areas where shootings are more common. The work that needs to be done is turning those areas into low crime areas, which comes with education, higher income and better prospects for success and financial security. To achieve this, certainly there must be a level of individual sense of drive and focus, as well as, perhaps, some policy changes to assist, but it largely comes down to a shift in the mentality of the black American culture and society to rise above the low expectations set for and by them, and to place a higher value on education and independence. There is no reason black Americans should not achieve at the levels of Asian and Middle Eastern Americans.
Posted on 7/12/16 at 11:53 pm to LoveThatMoney
I feel like you just Frank-the-Tank'd James Carville with that one.
Posted on 7/13/16 at 12:06 am to dragginass
quote:
Another race-baiter
FIFY. He's hardly ignorant. He's just a race-baiter.
Posted on 7/13/16 at 12:08 am to bwm14
It’s a very American story of how black people have systematically been denied the opportunity to live in safe and stable neighborhoods. No amount of “individual responsibility” or “bootstrapping” will ever change that.
How is Concord Estates these days, once had friends that lived there, it is in South BR, at the time it seemed like the residents were about 90% black working professionals. Every one of them would probably tell you that individual responsibility was a factor in them not living in North BR.
How is Concord Estates these days, once had friends that lived there, it is in South BR, at the time it seemed like the residents were about 90% black working professionals. Every one of them would probably tell you that individual responsibility was a factor in them not living in North BR.
Posted on 7/13/16 at 12:08 am to bwm14
Why do the tards get promoted to teach kids?
Posted on 7/13/16 at 6:28 am to bwm14
"picked his pocket for a gun".
When a law professor is indistinguishable in his hysterical alarmist language from a 16 year old with "he gat" , the law school may have problems.

When a law professor is indistinguishable in his hysterical alarmist language from a 16 year old with "he gat" , the law school may have problems.
Posted on 7/13/16 at 6:31 am to CharlieDay
quote:
LSU is getting dangerously close to Mizzou level.
We tried to tell you that it was only a matter of time before every university got infected with the dumb arse but you wouldn't listen
Posted on 7/13/16 at 6:36 am to Sofa King Crimson
quote:
quote:
From now on, however, the image of my city includes that of a visibly restrained man being shot at point blank range, then left to bleed to death while members of our police force picked his pockets for a gun.
What a fricking joke. Amazing that people are so emotional that they overlook what the video actually shows.
This is why we can't have nice things.
People are fricking stupid. You go through that much trouble to ignore plain as day facts you have no usefulness. I'd just as soon see you hit in the head with a brick and left for maggot food.
Posted on 7/13/16 at 6:41 am to udtiger
quote:
LSU Law Professor writes article for NYT
Is he related to the former federal judge Ralph Tyson?
That would certainly explain the borderline retardation.
Judge Tysons son. The Judge is doing barrel rolls in his grave.
Posted on 7/13/16 at 6:53 am to Charlie Arglist
quote:
A few years ago, my wife and I moved from our old home, a block from what is essentially the north-south dividing line, to south Baton Rouge to be closer to her job
LOL...... This guy is so full of shite on this statement alone.
Posted on 7/13/16 at 6:55 am to bwm14
i got to the line about "picked his pocket" and realized the author was a frick-tard. a law professor ought to have at least a passing knowledge of law and law enforcement. instead he's a frick-tard.
Popular
Back to top


1






