Started By
Message

re: Looks like there may be more problems for Boeing regarding that Air India crash

Posted on 7/11/25 at 9:00 pm to
Posted by TonySoprano
In my recliner
Member since Dec 2014
37 posts
Posted on 7/11/25 at 9:00 pm to
LINK

Watch Captain Steve break it down so even a 4th grader can understand. The video shows that the RAT deployed just after rotation…. Somebody in that cockpit shut off the fuel. There’s no way they were able to taxi and take off with those switches off. It’s not as simple as just flipping a switch, it’s a 3 part process.


Looks like murder/suicide to me.
Posted by terd ferguson
Darren Wilson Fan Club President
Member since Aug 2007
113773 posts
Posted on 7/11/25 at 9:25 pm to
AI did this
Posted by tigerinthebueche
Member since Oct 2010
37661 posts
Posted on 7/11/25 at 9:40 pm to
Hey Captain, what do these switches do?

Click
Posted by Mr Breeze
The Lunatic Fringe
Member since Dec 2010
6653 posts
Posted on 7/11/25 at 9:57 pm to
quote:

Watch Captain Steve break it down so even a 4th grader can understand.

A wise man with the credentials and experience to back it up.

WSJ article link below is "gifted" to get past the paywall, if active for the content.

Air India Crash Report Confirms Fuel Was Cut Off Before Accident
Posted by DByrd2
Fredericksburg, VA
Member since Jun 2008
9872 posts
Posted on 7/11/25 at 10:27 pm to
Yes. If they were all on the same circuit breaker panel, or all were under the same Power Control Unit “upstream” in the electronics path, and they lost power simultaneously then it would definitely be a VERY bad design flaw.

Betrays the common airworthiness design of redundant power paths that were identified long ago as best practices in the aircraft industry.
Posted by Landmass
Premium Member
Member since Jun 2013
23652 posts
Posted on 7/11/25 at 10:31 pm to
Why the hell would you even automate a fuel cutoff? That should be like a fricking big arse red switch encased in glass.
Posted by TutHillTiger
Mississippi Alabama
Member since Sep 2010
49741 posts
Posted on 7/11/25 at 10:39 pm to
The day that let the McDonnell Douglas Management team take over Boeing, is the actual date of death for Boeing
Posted by Ncook
Member since Feb 2019
721 posts
Posted on 7/11/25 at 10:53 pm to
No automatic shut off.

One of the pilots turned off.

Not a Boeing issue.
Posted by Meauxjeaux
102836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
45524 posts
Posted on 7/11/25 at 11:35 pm to
Seems as though it should be impossible for a fuel switch to flip to cut off while on ascent or at minimum at least below say, 10,000 feet
This post was edited on 7/11/25 at 11:36 pm
Posted by HeyCap
Member since Nov 2014
975 posts
Posted on 7/12/25 at 3:57 am to
quote:

A wise man with the credentials and experience to back it up.

LOL!
So wise that he was banging the “flaps were up” theory less than 24 hrs after the crash when it was pretty easy to see they weren’t. Professionals don’t act this way. The man’s a charlatan looking for clicks.
And fuel cutoff switches just don’t go from “on” to “off”.
Posted by redstick13
Lower Saxony
Member since Feb 2007
40392 posts
Posted on 7/12/25 at 6:06 am to
quote:

If they just cut off without human intervention.


Don’t you think all the other Boeing 787 planes would have been grounded if this were the case?
This post was edited on 7/12/25 at 6:35 am
Posted by DByrd2
Fredericksburg, VA
Member since Jun 2008
9872 posts
Posted on 7/12/25 at 6:10 am to
I stand corrected. Shouldn’t have driveby posted this one.

Definitely purposeful.
Posted by BHM
Member since Jun 2012
3829 posts
Posted on 7/12/25 at 6:11 am to
quote:

Seems as though it should be impossible for a fuel switch to flip to cut off while on ascent or at minimum at least below say, 10,000 feet



So if an engine fire occurs at 5,000 feet, they should just keep feeding it fuel while singing the engine is on fire, we don't care let the mother fricker burn?
Posted by Camp Randall
The Shadow of the Valley of Death
Member since Nov 2005
17066 posts
Posted on 7/12/25 at 6:22 am to
quote:

No idea but both pilots indicated they didn't do it on the voice recorder.


I didn’t shite myself in the car on the way back from Florida after eating a chili cheese coney from sonic and getting stuck in traffic.
Posted by SlidellCajun
Slidell la
Member since May 2019
15576 posts
Posted on 7/12/25 at 6:32 am to
We need robots instead of humans

Posted by Tigeralum2008
Yankees Fan
Member since Apr 2012
17593 posts
Posted on 7/12/25 at 6:35 am to
quote:

We need robots instead of humans


Aviation really is a perfect opportunity for automated control with human safety operators observing.

It’s nearly there already
Posted by HeadCall
Member since Feb 2025
5715 posts
Posted on 7/12/25 at 7:31 am to
quote:

Aviation really is a perfect opportunity for automated control with human safety operators observing. It’s nearly there already


Not sure how that would’ve stopped this assuming the pilots really did shutoff the fuel control switches.
Posted by TigerHornII
Member since Feb 2021
1154 posts
Posted on 7/12/25 at 7:46 am to
quote:

quote:
Aviation really is a perfect opportunity for automated control with human safety operators observing. It’s nearly there already


Not sure how that would’ve stopped this assuming the pilots really did shutoff the fuel control switches.


Automation would have asked "Are you sure?" about 5x before accepting the input, giving the other pilot time to react.

If you look at where these switches are in the cockpit vs where the PIC's hands would have been at that time, this is beyond any doubt an intentional act on the part of one of them.
Posted by HeadCall
Member since Feb 2025
5715 posts
Posted on 7/12/25 at 7:54 am to
quote:

Automation would have asked "Are you sure?" about 5x before accepting the input, giving the other pilot time to react.


That’s assuming he did it on accident, which is really inconceivable to me. The only time you ever touch those switches is to start and stop the motors or to shut one down in flight if there’s a major malfunction. Turning both off is even less conceivable. Unless they were shutting one down because it failed and accidentally killed fuel to the remaining good engine. But you don’t do that for engine failure on takeoff unless the thing is on fire. And even then you’d get concurrence from the other pilot before moving the switch. Normally you’d wait till you gained some altitude and go through the shutdown process methodically.

Or one of the guys just shut them both down on purpose to commit suicide.
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
35728 posts
Posted on 7/12/25 at 9:17 am to
quote:

Seems as though it should be impossible for a fuel switch to flip to cut off while on ascent or at minimum at least below say, 10,000 feet


They make it possible for engine fires and engine failure, so it makes sense. I would think there’s an assumption a pilot would not turn it off for 2 heathy engines.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram