Started By
Message

re: Let’s discuss the French Revolution, please

Posted on 7/17/25 at 7:25 pm to
Posted by dawgfan24348
Member since Oct 2011
51382 posts
Posted on 7/17/25 at 7:25 pm to
Sort of, the poor people or commoners paid the majority of taxes by far as the rich or nobility paid very little in taxes as they were exempt from most of it. Around the same time France was facing major economic problems in large part due to the American revolution and French and Indian war. The rich continued to frick over the poor people who were the majority even with economic problems.

It can also be said that in a crazy ironic twist that the success of the American revolution helped inspire the French people to rise up against the ruling class in France.

Then the storming of the Bastille happened and it basically became Eat The Rich
Posted by OWLFAN86
Erotic Novelist
Member since Jun 2004
194113 posts
Posted on 7/17/25 at 7:26 pm to
quote:

Podcast "The Rest is History,"
great podcast
Posted by blue_morrison
Member since Jan 2013
5905 posts
Posted on 7/17/25 at 7:30 pm to
.
This post was edited on 7/24/25 at 10:08 pm
Posted by grizzlylongcut
Member since Sep 2021
14168 posts
Posted on 7/17/25 at 7:31 pm to
quote:

Then the storming of the Bastille happened and it basically became Eat The Rich


Yeah but the American Revolution was also different in that way because it was the upper class who led it too.
Posted by geauxtigers87
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2011
26653 posts
Posted on 7/17/25 at 7:33 pm to
True but it's the one time in history a revolution was lead by its countries political and intellectual elite, not one or the other. The American revolution that is.
This post was edited on 7/17/25 at 7:34 pm
Posted by snatch
West Monroe
Member since Mar 2008
159 posts
Posted on 7/17/25 at 7:33 pm to
What he is doing now is straight trash. I listened to first like 3-4 episodes and stopped downloading.
Posted by Antonio Moss
The South
Member since Mar 2006
49034 posts
Posted on 7/17/25 at 7:39 pm to
quote:

it was the attempt to extend the rights of man granted to them by God, without including God

that's why it failed


Maybe. But the American Revolution is an anomaly in that it is a rare circumstance where people conquered an oppressing power and then immediately relinquished the political power that came with the victory.

In almost every other circumstance, the people conquering the oppressing power becomes more oppressive than the overthrown regime.
Posted by dawgfan24348
Member since Oct 2011
51382 posts
Posted on 7/17/25 at 7:40 pm to
American revolution was different in that their rulers were across the ocean in a completely different country. They just made it hell for England to continue being there and once England realized it was no longer worth the fight they agreed to let the Americans form their own sovereign state.
Posted by OWLFAN86
Erotic Novelist
Member since Jun 2004
194113 posts
Posted on 7/17/25 at 7:43 pm to
quote:

Maybe. But the American Revolution is an anomaly in that it is a rare circumstance where people conquered an oppressing power and then immediately relinquished the political power that came with the victory.
Yes , you're correct, but I think a major part/trust of that is the people recognize that the government that was forming recognized that God had given the rights and government could not take them away

a covenant, if you will
This post was edited on 7/17/25 at 7:45 pm
Posted by Bama Bird
Pittsburgh, PA
Member since Mar 2013
22549 posts
Posted on 7/17/25 at 7:45 pm to
quote:

Where did it go so wrong?


'Liberating' yourself from... yourself is a very different thing from what the USA went through. You need a common enemy and a common goal. Russia and the US had both, but the French did not have the latter and that opens yourself for people like Robespiere and Napoleon who briefly made the situation even worse.
This post was edited on 7/17/25 at 7:53 pm
Posted by Bama Bird
Pittsburgh, PA
Member since Mar 2013
22549 posts
Posted on 7/17/25 at 7:48 pm to
quote:

the American Revolution and the U.S. Civil War so much more I guess organized is a good way to put it


And this is very revisionist. It seems to be true based on where we are now, but it absolutely wasn't the case. The Union nearly lost the war solely on its disorganization alone. Same for the American Revolution.
Posted by Gee Grenouille
Bogalusa
Member since Jul 2018
7460 posts
Posted on 7/17/25 at 7:54 pm to
quote:

But the French Revolution seems almost like a whole lot of stupidity


quote:

French


quote:

Stupidity


Do you want to know why everything in Louisiana sucks? Cause it’s the same people.
Posted by HooDooWitch
TD Bronze member
Member since Sep 2009
11121 posts
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:12 pm to
I’m not going to claim that I know anything about the French Revolution, and this is a little off a thread highjack. My grandmother left this to me when she passed. Cross passed down through the family since 1690’s.



This letter was a reply from the French Consulate when my grand mother had mailed a letter to them. What’s funny is she couldn’t get a good Polaroid of it so she drew a picture, ??

Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
56638 posts
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:15 pm to
Read

12 who ruled

Rousseau and Revolution by Durant. Won a Pulitzer
Posted by faraway
Member since Nov 2022
3519 posts
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:18 pm to
you aren't likely to get a discussion on why it really happened. same thing with World War 1. dig deep and see why they were really tied together.
Posted by grizzlylongcut
Member since Sep 2021
14168 posts
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:25 pm to
quote:

And this is very revisionist. It seems to be true based on where we are now, but it absolutely wasn't the case. The Union nearly lost the war solely on its disorganization alone. Same for the American Revolution.


Ok, how about controlled then? At least until Sherman decided to become a terrorist in the Civil War, the Revolution and Civil War were much more controlled than the French Revolution.

There weren’t guillotines, reigns of terror, etc.
Posted by OWLFAN86
Erotic Novelist
Member since Jun 2004
194113 posts
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:28 pm to
quote:

At least until Sherman decided to become a terrorist in the Civil War, the Revolution and Civil War were much more controlled than the French Revolution.

There weren’t guillotines, reigns of terror, etc.
well there were lynchings,, and the klan

democrats
This post was edited on 7/17/25 at 8:34 pm
Posted by Midtiger farm
Member since Nov 2014
5866 posts
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:40 pm to
quote:

SammyTigerIf you like podcasts Mike duncan has a very long one about revolutions in general and a logn segment of it is about the French Revolution.


Best podcast that exists
I’ve listened to the seasons on American, Spanish (South American) , Mexican, Haitian, French , and Russian Revolutions

Wish he would come out with more seasons
Posted by grizzlylongcut
Member since Sep 2021
14168 posts
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:44 pm to
quote:

well there were lynchings,, and the klan democrats


No where near the level of the French Revolution and wasn’t really until after the Civil War did both of those things happen en masse.
Posted by OWLFAN86
Erotic Novelist
Member since Jun 2004
194113 posts
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:47 pm to
he gives a lot of weight to the Silicon Valley.

not saying he's wrong, But I think he underestimates the northeastern establishment and oil and gas money

that's another topic
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram