- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Posted on 6/9/24 at 10:21 pm to GoAwayImBaitn
Posted on 6/9/24 at 10:21 pm to GoAwayImBaitn
quote:
Yeah and the Ukrainians could have not fired upon civilians in the Donetsk region for 8 years
Are you implying that Russias war with Ukraine is justified because Ukraine fired on Donetsk?
Posted on 6/9/24 at 10:31 pm to GoAwayImBaitn
quote:
You have no logical response. Thanks for playing.
These dumbassed allegations have been answered over and over and over and over again in this thread for 3877 pages... your kind doesn't come here to actually take in information and read anything, you just keep repeating the same crap over and over... you're trolls at best, brainwashed at worst.
Posted on 6/9/24 at 10:35 pm to AU86
quote:
The Biden Administration’s limited policy change permitting Ukraine to use US-provided weapons to strike some Russian military targets in a small area within Russian territory has reduced the size of Russia’s ground sanctuary by only 16 percent at maximum. US policy still preserves at least 84 percent of Russia's ground sanctuary – territory within range of Ukrainian ATACMS.
"As long as it takes"
Can some of you Biden fanboys explain what Poopin' Joe means when he says this? I seriously doubt he knows.
Can you explain to me exactly what Trump will do if he wins?
Posted on 6/9/24 at 10:48 pm to Lee B
This could impact Macron's power... but it seems a gamble he would not take if he wasn't confident in the result...
CNN: Macron gambles on snap election after crushing loss to French far right in EU vote.
France’s President Emmanuel Macron has dissolved the country’s parliament, the National Assembly, and called a snap election after an exit poll showed his Renaissance party is set to be trounced by the far-right opposition in European parliamentary elections on Sunday.
After initial projections, the far-right National Rally (RN) party came out on top with 31.5% of the vote, more than double the share of Renaissance, which scraped into second place on 15.2% of the vote, just ahead of the Socialists in third with 14.3% of the vote.
...
CNN: Macron gambles on snap election after crushing loss to French far right in EU vote.
France’s President Emmanuel Macron has dissolved the country’s parliament, the National Assembly, and called a snap election after an exit poll showed his Renaissance party is set to be trounced by the far-right opposition in European parliamentary elections on Sunday.
After initial projections, the far-right National Rally (RN) party came out on top with 31.5% of the vote, more than double the share of Renaissance, which scraped into second place on 15.2% of the vote, just ahead of the Socialists in third with 14.3% of the vote.
...
Posted on 6/9/24 at 11:03 pm to Lee B
quote:
These dumbassed allegations have been answered over and over and over and over again in this thread for 3877 pages... your kind doesn't come here to actually take in information and read anything, you just keep repeating the same crap over and over... you're trolls at best, brainwashed at worst.
Sorry I messed up your little safe space here buddy
Posted on 6/9/24 at 11:24 pm to GoAwayImBaitn
quote:
Im pro make peace
This is an unnecessary war, like the rest of them.
You are one of the bend over and take it people, I don't understand you but I understand you exist but this and pretty much every other country exists because of people that didn't care to take it with a smile.
Posted on 6/9/24 at 11:29 pm to GoAwayImBaitn
By no means were these victims all “killed by the Ukrainians.” According to the U.N., 10,900 victims were soldiers, of which 4,400 were Ukrainians and 6,500 pro-Russian combatants of or on behalf of the separatist pseudo-republics. Civilian victims were between 3,400 and 3,500. The latter were in turn not all victims of attacks and of drones and rockets launched by Ukraine against the pseudo-republics. In fact, a part died in the portions of the oblasts of Luhansk and Donetsk that remained under Ukrainian control during attacks by separatists.
The U.N. report also notes that 8.8% of all civilian victims come from a single incident, which happened on July 17, 2014, when Malaysian Airlines flight MH17 from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur was shot by a missile, and all the 298 who were aboard (283 passengers and 15 crew members) died. While Russian and pro-Russian propaganda has tried to spread several conspiracy theories about the incident, two Dutch investigations concluded that the plane was shot by a surface-to-air missile supplied by Russia.
LINK
The U.N. report also notes that 8.8% of all civilian victims come from a single incident, which happened on July 17, 2014, when Malaysian Airlines flight MH17 from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur was shot by a missile, and all the 298 who were aboard (283 passengers and 15 crew members) died. While Russian and pro-Russian propaganda has tried to spread several conspiracy theories about the incident, two Dutch investigations concluded that the plane was shot by a surface-to-air missile supplied by Russia.
LINK
This post was edited on 6/9/24 at 11:35 pm
Posted on 6/10/24 at 12:56 am to Lee B
"As long as it takes"
As far as I can tell from what all the experts who supposedly have access to discussions that go on behind closed doors about all of this stuff...
"As long as it takes" means containing Russia to fighting in Ukraine, rather than spilling over to a full NATO confrontation, for as long as it takes for Putin's economy and military and power are degraded to the point where he is not a problem for anyone anymore. As to why we have restrictions, apparently, it is to avoid escalation to a Nuclear exchange (the same reason we want to avoid a full NATO confrontation with Russia). These things get expanded in baby steps... having other countries in NATO remove restrictions first undercuts Putin portraying it as a US aggression, but someone predicted by the end of this year Ukraine will have permission to strike anything anywhere in Russia, because Putin makes the case for it every time he retaliates to a Ukrainian military success by killing Ukrainian civilians in anger. There's politics involved, too... there will be people screaming when those restrictions are lifted and trying to cut off aid again because of it, so public support has to be built... and I personally think it's a shame it has to be built on the graves of Ukrainians.
As far as I can tell from what all the experts who supposedly have access to discussions that go on behind closed doors about all of this stuff...
"As long as it takes" means containing Russia to fighting in Ukraine, rather than spilling over to a full NATO confrontation, for as long as it takes for Putin's economy and military and power are degraded to the point where he is not a problem for anyone anymore. As to why we have restrictions, apparently, it is to avoid escalation to a Nuclear exchange (the same reason we want to avoid a full NATO confrontation with Russia). These things get expanded in baby steps... having other countries in NATO remove restrictions first undercuts Putin portraying it as a US aggression, but someone predicted by the end of this year Ukraine will have permission to strike anything anywhere in Russia, because Putin makes the case for it every time he retaliates to a Ukrainian military success by killing Ukrainian civilians in anger. There's politics involved, too... there will be people screaming when those restrictions are lifted and trying to cut off aid again because of it, so public support has to be built... and I personally think it's a shame it has to be built on the graves of Ukrainians.
Posted on 6/10/24 at 5:00 am to GoAwayImBaitn
quote:
Ukraine is still losing
So does that mean Russia is winning?
Posted on 6/10/24 at 5:04 am to Lee B
The Hill:
Graham says he supports the US training forces in Ukraine
Graham says he supports the US training forces in Ukraine
quote:
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said Sunday he would support the United States training Ukrainian forces overseas.
“Yes, I do support us training inside the country. The delay and weapons because of House inaction, we did lose momentum. But from the very beginning, the Biden administration, they did not impose pre-invasion sanctions to deter Putin. They didn’t give weapons to Ukraine early on to deter Putin. And now we got a chance to reset this war that they have the weapons,” Graham said on CBS’s “Face the Nation.”
quote:
Graham continued to emphasize his support for Ukraine amid its ongoing war with Russia, which invaded the country more than two years ago.
“Either we’re going to help Ukraine or we’re not. It’s now time to give them the F-16s, let them fly the planes, long-range artillery to hit targets inside of Russia. Go after Putin’s assets wherever, all over the world. Go on the offensive. I think the summer Ukraine will regain military momentum,” he said.
Posted on 6/10/24 at 5:11 am to Lee B
quote:Ukrainians be damned?
"As long as it takes" means containing Russia to fighting in Ukraine, rather than spilling over to a full NATO confrontation, for as long as it takes for Putin's economy and military and power are degraded to the point where he is not a problem for anyone anymore.
quote:Facts not in evidence.
... and I personally think it's a shame it has to be built on the graves of Ukrainians.
This administration made it crystal clear over two years ago they want this war. They don't want peace. They made it crystal clear, just as you described, that they are happy throw as much Ukrainian human fodder as possible at the Russians to "press Putin." Define it as you'd like. Blame whomever you want. But in the end, you support sacrificing thousands and thousands of Ukrainians in order to hopefully "weaken" Putin.
This post was edited on 6/10/24 at 5:40 am
Posted on 6/10/24 at 5:16 am to Obtuse1
quote:
You are one of the bend over and take it people
Lol...says someone who is enjoying getting reamed on taxation so that it can be funneled to fund a corrupt country's war and line it's politician's pockets
quote:
I don't understand you but I understand you exist
You aren't too smart but glad to see you are trying to wrap your head around the fact you support a losing battle. You are proof the government's propaganda works on far too many
Posted on 6/10/24 at 5:19 am to GOP_Tiger
Big claim from the Ukrainian general staff (official Telegram page):
Obviously, video evidence needs to be forthcoming to support these claims. I saw one Russian source that there were NOT any secondary explosions.
quote:
Tonight, the Defense Forces of Ukraine carried out successful strikes against one S-400 anti-aircraft missile division in the Dzhankoy area, as well as two enemy S-300 anti-aircraft missile divisions near Chornomorske and Yevpatoriya.
None of our launched missiles was intercepted by the enemy's "highly effective" anti-aircraft defense.
In particular, in the specified areas, after the strikes of the Ukrainian missile launchers, the immediate shutdown of the complex's radars was recorded S-300/S-400.
In addition, further detonation of ammunition was noted in all three areas of the starting positions of the anti-aircraft missile divisions of the Russian Federation.
Thanks to the successful combat work of the Defense Forces, Air defense of the Russian invaders in the Ukrainian Crimea suffered significant losses.
Obviously, video evidence needs to be forthcoming to support these claims. I saw one Russian source that there were NOT any secondary explosions.
Posted on 6/10/24 at 5:19 am to No Colors
quote:
So does that mean Russia is winning?
Well if Ukraine is losing, you tell us if Russia is winning...
Too many in this thread just aren't very smart I see
Posted on 6/10/24 at 5:29 am to Chromdome35
quote:
Are you implying that Russias war with Ukraine is justified because Ukraine fired on Donetsk?
Poor sap drinks Russian propaganda from a firehose and then is pathetic enough to say this:
quote:
You are proof the government's propaganda works on far too many
People like him really aren't worth the time. There are lots of us here trying to understand the war and follow its developments. This thread gets a lot less readable when trolls come in to stir up crap and then people respond to every little thing that they say. There's no helping ignorant people who are proud of being ignorant -- just ignore them.
Posted on 6/10/24 at 5:29 am to GoAwayImBaitn
quote:
Too many in this thread just aren't very smart I see
I'm glad a smart guy has entered the chat. I'm sure we can all benefit from your insight
quote:
you tell us if Russia is winning...
See this is the problem. I've never been able to understand what a Russian victory looks like.
Since you're the smart guy, I'm sure you can tell us. So go ahead.
And while you're at it, let us know when we can expect this Russian victory?
Posted on 6/10/24 at 5:30 am to GoAwayImBaitn
quote:This is an instance where the win-lose pairing is uncoupled. Russia may have the upper hand, but it's is losing too. Meanwhile, both sides claim they're winning.
Well if Ukraine is losing, you tell us if Russia is winning...
Posted on 6/10/24 at 5:32 am to GOP_Tiger
quote:
Poor sap drinks Russian propaganda from a firehose
Posted on 6/10/24 at 5:34 am to GOP_Tiger
quote:
Big claim from the Ukrainian general staff (official Telegram page):
Tendar reporting that NASA Firms data does show ongoing fires at two locations. He also has a map of last night's claimed ATACMS strikes.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 6/10/24 at 5:36 am to No Colors
quote:
See this is the problem. I've never been able to understand what a Russian victory looks like.
Since you're the smart guy, I'm sure you can tell us. So go ahead.
Go look at a current map. See that shaded color showing how Russia has gained and is now controlling miles and miles of Ukrainian territory?
Now go do the same observation across the Russian border. See any new Ukrainian control over Russian lands?
Some hard stuff to comprehend isn't it?
Popular
Back to top


1




