Started By
Message

re: Last man standing. Robert E Lee will be taken down Friday

Posted on 5/18/17 at 2:51 pm to
Posted by LSU Fan 90812
A man more eviler than Skeletor.
Member since Feb 2005
50655 posts
Posted on 5/18/17 at 2:51 pm to
quote:

In a sense, the world you describe in your posts is one where only the victors are allowed to write the history books. In this case, though, we live in America. And for years and years people have fought for free speech, free press, and free expression rights. Organizations exist today to ensure American civil liberties. But now we are erasing historical figures from public view because we don't like what they stood for 150 years ago? That is decidedly un-American. I am not sure how someone could claim to be in favor of free speech, yet also favor the censoring of historical figures from public view.


that's the world we live in. a world where the dominant religion is the religion that won out. it's not that hard to see.

the american history we learn in is slanted towards the american narrative. also not hard to see. it is the same in all countries around the world. do you think china teaches history the same way we do here?

quote:

Didn't many of the forefathers of this country own slaves? Should we tear down monuments to Washington, Jefferson, etc?


no. why would we? it was legal. they were presidents of the U.S. we live in the U.S.

quote:

What exactly is the reason to take this action? Instead of people needing to argue why they shouldn't be taken down, shouldn't there be a legitimate reason to take them down in the first place? What is the expected benefit? What is the actual harm done by keeping them up?



i'm not arguing for taking them down. in my opinion they should be left up, with strong historical language educating the populace as to why they are there, as much education about the merits of the person the monument is memorializing and why the battles were important.

BUT, it's also reasonably clear that growing up in the south people have a fun but historical fondness for their rebellion. and part of the reconciliation has to do with the north patting the south on its head and saying, "it's okay little brother. you fought hard. you can keep your toys and trophies".

and that though these historical figures have become embedded as parts of "history" post civil war in communities throughout the south into the present, in most cases historically, this would not be allowed or encouraged. therefore, it's not really that big a deal that they're being taken down.

are you an american? if you're an american, the robert e. lee statue represents a tactical genius commander responsible for the death of millions of americans and the near dissolution of the country within which you still live.

so the question is are you a southerner or are you an american?

also, states rights. taxation. civil war was still about slaves.



This post was edited on 5/18/17 at 2:54 pm
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
58629 posts
Posted on 5/18/17 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

if you're an american, the robert e. lee statue represents a tactical genius commander responsible for the death of millions of americans and the near dissolution of the country within which you still live.
no that would be Lincoln.
Posted by RedPop4
Santiago de Compostela
Member since Jan 2005
15336 posts
Posted on 5/18/17 at 2:55 pm to
Lee didn't go across the Union cutting a 100 mile wide swath in his path, burning and destroying everything. That's ok, I guess, he won, right?
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
58629 posts
Posted on 5/18/17 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

also, states rights. taxation. civil war was still about slaves.
quote:

american history we learn in is slanted towards the american narrative
oh so it is ok when the winners version of history is a part of the narrative.

seriously do some research and you will understand the fighting for slavery wasnt pushed till later in the war when the North needed a moral boost. if you really really think it was about the slaves tell me why the Union originally outlawed slavery in the southern states but not the norther states.
This post was edited on 5/18/17 at 2:58 pm
Posted by LSU Fan 90812
A man more eviler than Skeletor.
Member since Feb 2005
50655 posts
Posted on 5/18/17 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

oh so it is ok when the winners version of history is a part of the narrative.

seriously do some research and you will understand the fighting for slavery wasnt pushed till later in the war when the North needed a moral boost. if you really really think it was about the slaves tell me why the USA outlawed slavery in the southern states but not the norther states.



i'm super well versed in civil war history. we're just arguing semantics in a super nuanced conversation that people have literally written tomes of history books and analysis, homey.

the winner's history is always part of the narrative. the winners won, the loser's lost and are usually dead.

so...

let's just be okay with that.
Posted by LSU Fan 90812
A man more eviler than Skeletor.
Member since Feb 2005
50655 posts
Posted on 5/18/17 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

Lee didn't go across the Union cutting a 100 mile wide swath in his path, burning and destroying everything. That's ok, I guess, he won, right?


yep. sherman totally did. but does it matter?

south lost. this includes my family. that's hard to take. but they did.
if they didn't, you'd still be living in the CS of A.
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
58629 posts
Posted on 5/18/17 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

yep. sherman totally did. but does it matter?
sure it matters. the black dont want to "get over" slavery, im not going to "get over" that.
Posted by RedPop4
Santiago de Compostela
Member since Jan 2005
15336 posts
Posted on 5/18/17 at 3:03 pm to
Possibly and possibly not. Without the manufacturing of the northern states, the C.S.A. might have ceased to exist no matter what, but we won't know. We do know that other than to Southerners, Sherman's March to the Sea is celebrated.

All we have is informed speculation or Harry Turtledove novels.
Posted by arseinclarse
Member since Apr 2007
35469 posts
Posted on 5/18/17 at 3:03 pm to
Is there a place where I can find who made political donations to Mitch? I wouldn't mind boycotting their businesses.
Posted by LSU Fan 90812
A man more eviler than Skeletor.
Member since Feb 2005
50655 posts
Posted on 5/18/17 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

no that would be Lincoln.


except that when you're an american, the history books are going to call him one of the greatest presidents ever...

so maybe, just maybe this is about historical perspective, and which one won out.

and those who lost, shouldn't be surprised or upset that their historical perspective is no considered valid in war memorializing.

i'd rather the monuments stay up for the education of all. but it's not surprising to me that they be taken down.
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
58629 posts
Posted on 5/18/17 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

i'm super well versed in civil war history
if you really really were you wouldnt have said
quote:

also, states rights. taxation. civil war was still about slaves.
Posted by Placebeaux
Bobby Fischer Fan Club President
Member since Jun 2008
51852 posts
Posted on 5/18/17 at 3:05 pm to
Posted by Rox
Member since Oct 2010
33333 posts
Posted on 5/18/17 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

Is there a place where I can find who made political donations to Mitch? I wouldn't mind boycotting their businesses.

LINK [{1|gro=d-eid" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Followthemoney.org Search for Mitch Landrieu Contributors

$6M of donations you can look through here.
Posted by LSU Fan 90812
A man more eviler than Skeletor.
Member since Feb 2005
50655 posts
Posted on 5/18/17 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

Possibly and possibly not. Without the manufacturing of the northern states, the C.S.A. might have ceased to exist no matter what, but we won't know. We do know that other than to Southerners, Sherman's March to the Sea is celebrated.


because it led to victory. which has been my whole point all along.


those who win get to tell the story. it's inherent.
people would also be shocked to find out that they don't really teach the "War of Independence" in british schools.

it seems that the brits were used to losing colonies and lump our nation's forming into figuring out the whole atlantic empire thingie.

this whole nation-centric thing really isn't that hard to understand.
This post was edited on 5/18/17 at 3:10 pm
Posted by arseinclarse
Member since Apr 2007
35469 posts
Posted on 5/18/17 at 3:07 pm to
Thanks
Posted by arseinclarse
Member since Apr 2007
35469 posts
Posted on 5/18/17 at 3:09 pm to
Lots of law firms.

Commander's!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

frick me.
Posted by LSU Fan 90812
A man more eviler than Skeletor.
Member since Feb 2005
50655 posts
Posted on 5/18/17 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

also, states rights. taxation. civil war was still about slaves.


we're condensing pages of a multifaceted circular argument into one sentence. quit pretending you think you have a grasp on my civil war knowledge and comprehension based on a message board post.
This post was edited on 5/18/17 at 3:11 pm
Posted by Rox
Member since Oct 2010
33333 posts
Posted on 5/18/17 at 3:11 pm to
:'(
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
79818 posts
Posted on 5/18/17 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

arseinclarse


Quickly scans for Lafitte's
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
28116 posts
Posted on 5/18/17 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

are you an american? if you're an american, the robert e. lee statue represents a tactical genius commander responsible for the death of millions of americans and the near dissolution of the country within which you still live.
Millions? I believe the total number of men who died in the Civil War was about 600,000.

As for Lee, he was anti-slavery and anti-secession. But he decided to fight for Virginia because he couldn't fight against his own people.

Back then, states were much more powerful and had a much stronger identity for the citizens than they do today. They were similar to being separate countries under the same umbrella of "America". Much different from today. Kind of like how the European Union is a collection of separate European countries. British people, when they were part of the European Union, saw themselves as British first.

Lee wasn't trying to fight against America. He was fighting for Virginia.
This post was edited on 5/18/17 at 3:22 pm
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram