Started By
Message

re: Lakes Mead, Powell May Not Refill ‘In Our Lifetimes’

Posted on 2/6/23 at 2:43 pm to
Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
101915 posts
Posted on 2/6/23 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

Of course it will, just as soon as the pipeline is built from the Mississippi River out there, it will fill in no time.

*Note sarcasm


I was discussing this with a friend who designs nuke plants not too long ago. The back of the napkin calcs on how much energy it would take to pump the necessary volume from the Missouri River near Kansas City up to the San Luis Valley where it could then be gravity piped underground to Lake Navajo.

Costs aside, it would take 3 or 4 nuclear plants to provide enough power, each one would of course require a shitton of the water just to cool themselves to run.

Long story short, never going to happen.
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
48848 posts
Posted on 2/6/23 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

Or they may refill in one year. No one knows for sure. A few years ago California was in its worst drought ever. One winter fixed that, then it went drought again.



Did you read what the guy said?

There is just as much, if not more, snow in the Rockies as usual. The difference is they are taking a lot more water out of these reservoirs than they did in the past. This is preventing them from refilling.
This post was edited on 2/6/23 at 2:47 pm
Posted by Pu2kph0
Member since Oct 2022
1055 posts
Posted on 2/6/23 at 2:46 pm to
Sorry. But I don’t believe anything that comes out of the mouths of anyone associated with a government agency. We have degraded as nation so much, that it seems only degenerates are in charge of our public agencies.

Shame on us for tolerating it.
Posted by Cymry Teigr
Member since Sep 2012
2100 posts
Posted on 2/6/23 at 2:54 pm to
Just have the Chinese use water balloons next time instead of weather balloons and they can supply Cali with all the water they’ll ever need.
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164048 posts
Posted on 2/6/23 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

Lakes Mead, Powell May Not Refill ‘In Our Lifetimes’

And they'll tie it to "climate change" and not the millions of people who shouldn't be living in a desert.
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
51895 posts
Posted on 2/6/23 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

They captured less than 20% of The historic rainfall the region just experienced.


You are attributing to a different region than this.
Posted by td1
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2015
2827 posts
Posted on 2/6/23 at 3:10 pm to
They should be thrilled. Nature is taking back over and the desert is becoming the desert again.

Funny how they only seem to care about preserving nature until it’s in their own backyard.
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51794 posts
Posted on 2/6/23 at 3:29 pm to
I believe his point was that the stupid fricks in California are doing absolutely jack shite to help a problem they created.
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
18587 posts
Posted on 2/6/23 at 4:02 pm to
quote:

Did you read what the guy said?



Yes

quote:

There is just as much, if not more, snow in the Rockies as usual.


So what? After several years of below normal moisture, one year of around normal won't fill them up, especially when:

quote:

The difference is they are taking a lot more water out of these reservoirs than they did in the past.


My point is, even with the added withdrawals, mother nature can flip a switch and the freaking thing would flood. We know short-term forecast (some), and long term trends in weather/climate we do not know anything for say 6 months from now with any certainty.


Posted by redstick13
Lower Saxony
Member since Feb 2007
38450 posts
Posted on 2/6/23 at 5:04 pm to
I do my part by only buying Florida oranges.
Posted by TheFlyingTiger
Member since Oct 2009
3993 posts
Posted on 2/6/23 at 5:04 pm to
Maybe.

Pesky reality has a way of doing shite like flooding the hell out of these lakes at some point in the future and people will shrug and just say oh well I gues that was wrong.

The drought and the flood will both be because you drive a v8 and eat meat tho.
Posted by redstick13
Lower Saxony
Member since Feb 2007
38450 posts
Posted on 2/6/23 at 5:10 pm to
quote:

Costs aside, it would take 3 or 4 nuclear plants to provide enough power, each one would of course require a shitton of the water just to cool themselves to run.


quote:

South Texas Nuclear Generating Station


quote:

Cooling source Main Cooling Reservoir (7,000 acres (2,800 ha), up to 202,600 acre-feet (249,900,000 m3) of cooling water storage, filled by pumping water from the Colorado River)


Pull it up on Google satellite view and take a look at the shear size of the cooling ponds of this facility.
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
48848 posts
Posted on 2/6/23 at 5:16 pm to
quote:

I do my part by only buying Florida oranges.




As I recall cashews, grown in CA, take a huge amount of water.
Posted by Cymry Teigr
Member since Sep 2012
2100 posts
Posted on 2/6/23 at 5:28 pm to
quote:

As I recall cashews, grown in CA, take a huge amount of water.


I always thought it was almonds that required voluminous quantities of water.
Posted by Clockwatcher68
Youngsville
Member since May 2006
6901 posts
Posted on 2/6/23 at 6:01 pm to
quote:

I always thought it was almonds that required voluminous quantities of water.


We need sensible almond laws.
Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
101915 posts
Posted on 2/6/23 at 6:03 pm to
quote:

I always thought it was almonds that required voluminous quantities of water.


Especially when we keep.turning them into milk.
Posted by Cracker
in a box
Member since Nov 2009
17669 posts
Posted on 2/6/23 at 6:38 pm to
All that damn rain in California went right into the Pacific Ocean as fast as it fell ?? idiots
Posted by jeffsdad
Member since Mar 2007
21368 posts
Posted on 2/6/23 at 6:44 pm to
They don't want to capture it, they want a pipeline to the mississippi river to get our water. They would rather 80% of the rainfall go back into the ocean than to resolve their own problems.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
39105 posts
Posted on 2/6/23 at 7:17 pm to
quote:

Impossible. I was told climate change would eliminate snow in the Sierra Nevada.

No you weren’t. At least not in our lifetimes. You are making a caricature of your opponents’ views so that your feeble efforts can overcome them. There is no need for that. Their views can be overcome in their native form.
Posted by DCtiger1
Panama City Beach
Member since Jul 2009
8755 posts
Posted on 2/6/23 at 7:20 pm to
quote:

You are attributing to a different region than this.


No, that water could’ve been captured to replenish these lakes.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram