- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kyle Rittenhouse Trial Discussion Thread
Posted on 11/17/21 at 1:29 pm to Volvagia
Posted on 11/17/21 at 1:29 pm to Volvagia
quote:
Better question is how does that explain the low res video shown in court
Apparently that's what the defense was given and was showing in court and the prosecution said we have a better resolution video than that the whole time and outed themselves.
This post was edited on 11/17/21 at 1:38 pm
1
Posted on 11/17/21 at 1:29 pm to blowmeauburn
quote:
what the frick are these defense attorney's doing? Push this shite. They just sit back and let Fatlock talk the judge into moving on. This is absurd.
It reminds me of Steve Harvey’s stand up on OJ saying he’d need to be chained to the chair and ball gag if he himself was ever charged with murder and why he knows that OJ’s guilty.
This post was edited on 11/17/21 at 1:30 pm
Posted on 11/17/21 at 1:33 pm to OMLandshark
And apparently this video was the ONLY piece of evidence that was not sent via Dropbox. Judge needs to come back right now and end this kangaroo trial.
This post was edited on 11/17/21 at 1:39 pm
Posted on 11/17/21 at 1:35 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
And apparently This video was the ONLY piece of evidence that was not sent via Dropbox. Judge needs to come back right now and end this kangaroo trial.
he will not, the fix is in on this one, I said it from the beginning.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 1:39 pm to BtonTiger318
quote:
Apparently that's what the defense was given and was showing in court and the prosecution said we have a better resolution video than that the hole time and outed themselves.
What are the legal standards (at least within Wisconsin) for transmitting evidence to the other side that may be compressed? Is the transmitting side obligated to point out that the video is compressed and/or provide instructions for uncompressing it?
Edit: I ask because usually compression artifacts are self-evident and I’m wondering if the case law in Wisconsin might say that the obligation is on the recipient party to specify the resolution of the video or file they are requesting.
This post was edited on 11/17/21 at 1:42 pm
Posted on 11/17/21 at 1:40 pm to UndercoverBryologist
quote:
Cathy Russon @cathyrusson · 5m #KyleRittenhouse -
One of the videos the jury wants to watch is just after Grosskreutz is shot in the arm. Another vid is when Grosskreutz is talking to Rittenhouse after he shot Rosenbaum. @LawCrimeNetwork
Kristen Barbaresi @KristenBarbar · 7m
In the meantime: The jury wants to see Gaige Grosskreutz livestream from that night (where he talks to Rittenhouse). And the BG on the Scene video, which shows Grosskreuz being shot, in regular & in slow motion. #KyleRittenhouse
Posted on 11/17/21 at 1:45 pm to 1BamaRTR
Posted on 11/17/21 at 1:45 pm to 1BamaRTR
Is there any live coverage streaming or on TV going on right now?
Posted on 11/17/21 at 1:51 pm to Volvagia
Prosecutors are saying they air dropped the file to "Mrs. Wysco", Kyle's 3rd attorney and since she has an android phone, it compressed it.
This post was edited on 11/17/21 at 1:52 pm
Posted on 11/17/21 at 1:54 pm to SUB
quote:
Prosecutors are saying they air dropped the file to "Mrs. Wysco", Kyle's 3rd attorney and since she has an android phone, it compressed it.
that is only the case if they chose to send it as full size or compressed. Its like when you send a picture and it ask you if you want to send small, medium, large or full file size.
If you just send the file, it will send the full file to the phone.This post was edited on 11/17/21 at 1:55 pm
Posted on 11/17/21 at 1:56 pm to CobraCommander83
quote:
Is there any live coverage streaming or on TV going on right now?
It would have to be considered pornographic given the blatant screwing that the government is trying to put on the people...
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:11 pm to LCA131
It’s live again.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:14 pm to OMLandshark
Defense asking for mistrial WITHOUT prejudice... WTF?
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:16 pm to BR92
No! Demand with prejudice you fricking cuck.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:16 pm to SUB
quote:
Prosecutors are saying they air dropped the file to "Mrs. Wysco", Kyle's 3rd attorney and since she has an android phone, it compressed it.
Holy shite what a lazy argument
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:24 pm to Oilfieldbiology
The prosecution isn’t accepting the mistrial. This is ridiculous.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:24 pm to JDPndahizzy
What’s the fricking point?
You’ll just have to do it all again, and the prosecution may not be as idiotic this time.
You’ll just have to do it all again, and the prosecution may not be as idiotic this time.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:24 pm to OMLandshark
Unknown Technical Incident....
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:25 pm to UndercoverBryologist
quote:
Is the transmitting side obligated to point out that the video is compressed and/or provide instructions for uncompressing it?
That's not how video compression works. The video has to be decompressed to play. The problem is that the original source can be compressed with lossy compression which means that the original video can no longer be recreated from it. There are lots of techniques that fill in the gaps created by lossy compression, but they can create artifacts and irregularities that don't appear in the original uncompressed video.
I cannot believe that there are not guidelines or laws for how to distribute digital evidence in Wisconsin.
Page 87 of 115
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News