- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kyle Rittenhouse Trial Discussion Thread
Posted on 11/16/21 at 4:06 pm to Oates Mustache
Posted on 11/16/21 at 4:06 pm to Oates Mustache
quote:They've been stressing that if self defense is found then he's not guilty be default. If not then he's probably going to be found guilty. Under WI law there's no charge in between that they can find him guilty of.
I'm telling you guys, they're having trouble with full conviction vs full acquittal and they're negotiating with each other a reduced charge.
Posted on 11/16/21 at 4:06 pm to LSUFan8719
(no message)
This post was edited on 7/20/26 at 2:27 pm
Posted on 11/16/21 at 4:07 pm to OMLandshark
(no message)
This post was edited on 7/20/26 at 2:26 pm
Posted on 11/16/21 at 4:09 pm to MSUDawg98
(no message)
This post was edited on 2/4/22 at 7:32 am
Posted on 11/16/21 at 4:22 pm to Winnebago Tiger
quote:
I think he could be found NG of homicide but still guilty of reckless endangerment but I could be off base. Anybody know?
IANAL but I doubt it. The prosecution made a big deal of Kyle using FMJ rounds, arguing that he recklessly disregarded overpenetration possibilities but any round he could have fired and missed, even with bullets that didn't overpenetrate, would have been a hazard to bystanders and residents. So if he legally defended himself, I don't see any way he could be found guilty of RE.
This post was edited on 11/16/21 at 5:05 pm
Posted on 11/16/21 at 4:32 pm to Diseasefreeforall
quote:
Diseasefreeforall
quote:
IANAL
quote:
I ANAL
Go on...
Posted on 11/16/21 at 4:34 pm to Diseasefreeforall
(no message)
This post was edited on 7/20/26 at 2:26 pm
Posted on 11/16/21 at 4:36 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
From Jack Posobiec:
quote:
Two jurors holding decision up, outright citing backlash, per US Marshal in Kenosha
Now how the frick would anyone know that
Posted on 11/16/21 at 4:36 pm to OMLandshark
You actually believe that don’t you lol
Posted on 11/16/21 at 4:38 pm to OMLandshark
Seems like a typical Jack P story
Posted on 11/16/21 at 4:38 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
More: Worried about media leaking their names, what will happen to their families, jobs, etc
Tell those 2 pussies to hire Kyle as their body guard.
Posted on 11/16/21 at 4:39 pm to JohnnyKilroy
(no message)
This post was edited on 7/20/26 at 2:26 pm
Posted on 11/16/21 at 4:39 pm to Ingeniero
Jack conveniently breaks news that always aligns with the public consensus and nobody ever brings it up regardless of what the actual outcome is
Posted on 11/16/21 at 4:40 pm to Pettifogger
(no message)
This post was edited on 7/20/26 at 2:26 pm
Posted on 11/16/21 at 4:44 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
More: Worried about media leaking their names, what will happen to their families, jobs, etc
wouldn’t even be the first time the media has attempted this in this case…
Posted on 11/16/21 at 4:45 pm to Ingeniero
quote:
Now how the frick would anyone know that
The important question is why would a US Marshal be involved in a state case?
Anyway. To play devil's advocate, it all depends if the jury had their mobile devices confiscated prior to deliberation. If so, ya....this is total bullshite. No one is allowed in that room with them, not even court officials.
If not, it could be very easy for a juror to reach out (despite instructions not to) to someone outside to let them know what's going on.
Posted on 11/16/21 at 4:52 pm to Centinel
(no message)
This post was edited on 7/20/26 at 2:25 pm
Popular
Back to top



1







