Started By
Message

re: Kyle Rittenhouse Trial Discussion Thread

Posted on 11/16/21 at 4:06 pm to
Posted by MSUDawg98
Ravens Flock
Member since Jan 2018
12343 posts
Posted on 11/16/21 at 4:06 pm to
quote:

I'm telling you guys, they're having trouble with full conviction vs full acquittal and they're negotiating with each other a reduced charge.
They've been stressing that if self defense is found then he's not guilty be default. If not then he's probably going to be found guilty. Under WI law there's no charge in between that they can find him guilty of.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
119977 posts
Posted on 11/16/21 at 4:06 pm to
quote:

He killed two people, why would it not go to trial?


Because he clearly did it in self defense, dummy. This isn’t like the Chauvin trial where even most posters here thought he may have committed 2nd Degree Manslaughter, but I don’t think the prosecution proved it beyond a reasonable doubt.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
119977 posts
Posted on 11/16/21 at 4:07 pm to
Good podcast on this from MartyrMade: Substack
Posted by Winnebago Tiger
Member since Aug 2021
152 posts
Posted on 11/16/21 at 4:09 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 2/4/22 at 7:32 am
Posted by Diseasefreeforall
Member since Oct 2012
7145 posts
Posted on 11/16/21 at 4:22 pm to
quote:

I think he could be found NG of homicide but still guilty of reckless endangerment but I could be off base. Anybody know?


IANAL but I doubt it. The prosecution made a big deal of Kyle using FMJ rounds, arguing that he recklessly disregarded overpenetration possibilities but any round he could have fired and missed, even with bullets that didn't overpenetrate, would have been a hazard to bystanders and residents. So if he legally defended himself, I don't see any way he could be found guilty of RE.

This post was edited on 11/16/21 at 5:05 pm
Posted by ducktale
Member since Sep 2021
1531 posts
Posted on 11/16/21 at 4:32 pm to
quote:

Diseasefreeforall


quote:

IANAL


quote:

I ANAL


Go on...
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
119977 posts
Posted on 11/16/21 at 4:34 pm to
From Jack Posobiec:

quote:

Two jurors holding decision up, outright citing backlash, per US Marshal in Kenosha


quote:

More: Worried about media leaking their names, what will happen to their families, jobs, etc


So it seems that 10 are Not Guilty and 2 are cowards. This is expected. I can’t imagine any brave person convicting Kyle.
Posted by ducktale
Member since Sep 2021
1531 posts
Posted on 11/16/21 at 4:36 pm to
Replace their asses.
Posted by Ingeniero
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2013
21836 posts
Posted on 11/16/21 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

From Jack Posobiec:

quote:
Two jurors holding decision up, outright citing backlash, per US Marshal in Kenosha


Now how the frick would anyone know that
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
40154 posts
Posted on 11/16/21 at 4:36 pm to
You actually believe that don’t you lol
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
85788 posts
Posted on 11/16/21 at 4:38 pm to
Seems like a typical Jack P story

Posted by NawlinsTiger9
Where the mongooses roam
Member since Jan 2009
38364 posts
Posted on 11/16/21 at 4:38 pm to
Yep
Posted by Winstonscrabfingers
Member since Oct 2021
542 posts
Posted on 11/16/21 at 4:38 pm to
quote:

More: Worried about media leaking their names, what will happen to their families, jobs, etc


Tell those 2 pussies to hire Kyle as their body guard.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
119977 posts
Posted on 11/16/21 at 4:39 pm to
quote:

You actually believe that don’t you lol


Jack is usually either dead right or dead wrong. Not much in between for him.
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
85788 posts
Posted on 11/16/21 at 4:39 pm to
Jack conveniently breaks news that always aligns with the public consensus and nobody ever brings it up regardless of what the actual outcome is
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
119977 posts
Posted on 11/16/21 at 4:40 pm to
If what Jack is saying is true, then mistrial with prejudice.

And Jack just posted this as well:

quote:

Including doxxing threats from ‘anarchist groups’
This post was edited on 11/16/21 at 4:41 pm
Posted by Tigerbait357
Member since Jun 2011
70768 posts
Posted on 11/16/21 at 4:40 pm to
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
72923 posts
Posted on 11/16/21 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

More: Worried about media leaking their names, what will happen to their families, jobs, etc


wouldn’t even be the first time the media has attempted this in this case…
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
44140 posts
Posted on 11/16/21 at 4:45 pm to
quote:

Now how the frick would anyone know that


The important question is why would a US Marshal be involved in a state case?

Anyway. To play devil's advocate, it all depends if the jury had their mobile devices confiscated prior to deliberation. If so, ya....this is total bullshite. No one is allowed in that room with them, not even court officials.

If not, it could be very easy for a juror to reach out (despite instructions not to) to someone outside to let them know what's going on.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
119977 posts
Posted on 11/16/21 at 4:52 pm to
Binger is not taking questions from the press after the verdict. Yeah, because you know everyone is going to light into you regardless of political affiliation since you put forth the worst case anyone has ever seen:

Jump to page
Page First 78 79 80 81 82 ... 115
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 80 of 115Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram