- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 2/17/24 at 1:32 pm to tigersmanager
quote:
Another disgusting democrat
Lol. No.
If someone chooses to do drugs, then their actions will lead them down a bad path, potentially. If that person overdosed, then you would say he or she shouldn’t have done drugs because their actions put them in a more dangerous situation. Doesn’t mean the person deserves to overdose. Doesn’t mean the drug dealer isn’t at fault for adding fentanyl. But I believe in personal responsibility, which is far from a democrat.
Posted on 2/17/24 at 1:35 pm to SixthAndBarone
The ironic thing is if she wouldn’t have been hit by a car, there is a chance she was ok with the events of the night, or even excited about it. Or she would have gone straight to the cops because she was raped. But there is no way to know with her being deceased. And the tricky part is the defendants aren’t charged with the actual murder
Drunk sex vs taking advantage of someone who doesn’t actually want sex is one of the toughest situations to decipher and anyone who pretends it isn’t is foolish.
There is no legal law on what amount of alcohol means consent vs no consent. So without the victim testimony, this is a very hard case for the prosecution
Drunk sex vs taking advantage of someone who doesn’t actually want sex is one of the toughest situations to decipher and anyone who pretends it isn’t is foolish.
There is no legal law on what amount of alcohol means consent vs no consent. So without the victim testimony, this is a very hard case for the prosecution
This post was edited on 2/17/24 at 1:38 pm
Posted on 2/17/24 at 1:42 pm to TigerGman
quote:
What if the young men were drunk too?
Consider this - the young men, to perform the sex act, would have to be at the very least conscious and have some of their mental faculties. A woman could be completely comatose and still, technically, have someone “have sex with her.” For that reason alone the men have more responsibility in this situation.
Posted on 2/17/24 at 1:45 pm to DVA Tailgater
quote:
I have seen lots of the videos. I eat lunch where one of the kids works and he is a very nice guy. (The driver)
Since he and the old guy declined to participate in the “sex”, i agree that they shouldn’t be charged as rapists. But they did sit by and do nothing. The driver is on video saying “they finna rape her.” He did nothing to stop it.
Posted on 2/17/24 at 1:46 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Drunk sex vs taking advantage of someone who doesn’t actually want sex is one of the toughest situations to decipher and anyone who pretends it isn’t is foolish.
Well said.
Posted on 2/17/24 at 2:06 pm to lsupride87
quote:
There is no legal law on what amount of alcohol means consent vs no consent.
Are you sure about that? When the event first happened I seem to recall several people stating there was a defined consent limit and she was well above it.
I have no idea if there is or isn't . . .
Posted on 2/17/24 at 2:45 pm to armytiger96
quote:They were using the defined limit for DUI. There is no defined limit for consent
Are you sure about that? When the event first happened I seem to recall several people stating there was a defined consent limit and she was well above it.
Posted on 2/17/24 at 3:21 pm to lsupride87
quote:
0.0% chance of that. They didn’t kill her
First degree rape is a life sentence in Louisiana.
LINK
Posted on 2/17/24 at 3:22 pm to lsupride87
quote:
there is a chance she was ok with the events of the night, or even excited about it. Or she would have gone straight to the cops because she was raped. But there is no way to know with her being deceased. And the tricky part is the defendants aren’t charged with the actual murder
No relevance at all.
Posted on 2/17/24 at 3:25 pm to pizota13
I didn't realize she had a podcast, I will check it out, but while I have no problem listening to some graphic shite, hearing parents who talking about losing their child (especially if the child is an age where they still had a life ahead of them) is something I can't do for long.
Posted on 2/17/24 at 3:25 pm to lsupride87
The public is just trying to punish someone because she died. And they are using the sex as their weapon
Posted on 2/17/24 at 3:30 pm to Lester Earl
What???? So if she had not died, should they still be charged??? I’m sure she would not have remembered anything from that night.
Posted on 2/17/24 at 3:32 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
No relevance at all.
Whether you like it or not, the jury likely will find it relevant, and they are going to make the ultimate decision in this case
This post was edited on 2/17/24 at 3:33 pm
Posted on 2/17/24 at 3:36 pm to lsupride87
quote:
The ironic thing is if she wouldn’t have been hit by a car,
We probably never know about anything from that night. She either wouldnt remember anything, too ashamed to say anything, or just chalk it up to a crazy drunken night.
Posted on 2/17/24 at 3:38 pm to Deactived
Exactly.
Posted on 2/17/24 at 3:59 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Whether you like it or not, the jury likely will find it relevant, and they are going to make the ultimate decision in this case
No relevance at all.
Posted on 2/17/24 at 4:10 pm to Deactived
quote:
We probably never know about anything from that night. She either wouldnt remember anything, too ashamed to say anything, or just chalk it up to a crazy drunken night.
Luckily for the DA, these guys provided the evidence by filming it. Maybe it will help their case or maybe it will hurt it, but the video is there. When it all comes out in court, we will probably read about it.
Posted on 2/17/24 at 5:01 pm to bott18240
quote:
eat lunch where one of the kids works and he is a very nice guy. (The driver).
Would it be a bad assumption to think he knew that Washington (?) had previously raped others?
So he brought a rabid dog to a kids park. And then jettisoned Brooks in freezing cold at 2AM.
I don't see a nice guy in this picture.
This post was edited on 2/17/24 at 5:07 pm
Posted on 2/17/24 at 5:07 pm to AlwysATgr
quote:
Would it be a bad assumption to think he knew that Washington (?) had previously raped others? So he brought a rabid dog to a kids park. And then jettisoned Brooks on freezing cold at 2AM. I don't see a nice guy in this picture.
It’s an unpopular opinion, but i think he did endanger her life by offering a ride, failing to intervene, and letting her out where he did in her condition. He also filmed the sex/rape without consent, which also is a criminal offense, i think.
Page 3 of 4
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News