- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Just got my letter from Blue Cross
Posted on 11/3/16 at 7:31 pm to Kujo
Posted on 11/3/16 at 7:31 pm to Kujo
quote:
I took a job 3 months ago as a permanent civil service. Pension after 25 years, my insurance premium for dental,vision, and healthcare is $2.79 per pay check....only because I elected for the higher tier dental so that I can go to my uncle.
Government is where it's at! Get in with a good division of regulators and cush city
You're welcome.
Posted on 11/3/16 at 7:33 pm to Geekboy
Mine went up 51%. This is bs.
Posted on 11/3/16 at 7:33 pm to sugatowng
Just got the letter from my employer. 2 options..
1) keep your premium as is ($70/month), but your deductible increases to $3500 from $1500
2) keep your deductible at $1500 but your premium goes up to about $100/month.
60/40 coverage
Edit: I'm the only one on my plan, no kids/spouse.
1) keep your premium as is ($70/month), but your deductible increases to $3500 from $1500
2) keep your deductible at $1500 but your premium goes up to about $100/month.
60/40 coverage
Edit: I'm the only one on my plan, no kids/spouse.
This post was edited on 11/3/16 at 7:36 pm
Posted on 11/3/16 at 7:43 pm to wiltznucs
Wiltznucs
You likely have some very good points in here. But why do you feel the need to skew with exec salaries? You know that is only a small incremental cost as it relates to premiums or cost of services...or am I wrong?
You likely have some very good points in here. But why do you feel the need to skew with exec salaries? You know that is only a small incremental cost as it relates to premiums or cost of services...or am I wrong?
Posted on 11/3/16 at 7:53 pm to tigersbb
tigersbb
I regret I have but one upvote to give you.
I regret I have but one upvote to give you.
Posted on 11/3/16 at 7:58 pm to Ellis Dee
quote:
Just got the letter from my employer. 2 options..
1) keep your premium as is ($70/month), but your deductible increases to $3500 from $1500
2) keep your deductible at $1500 but your premium goes up to about $100/month.
60/40 coverage
Tough call, but if you're reasonably healthy, pocket the $30 savings every month until you need it down the road.
Posted on 11/3/16 at 8:00 pm to Geekboy
Cry me a river. It's a small price to pay for the opportunity to correct hundreds of years of social injustice and even the playing field a bit for those who have not stolen all the resources and wealth for themselves. Quit being selfish, cancel that vacation, downsize on the home and work harder. Remember, this is just the start. Our Progressive Future has so much more in store for you to look forward to.
FORWARD !

FORWARD !
This post was edited on 11/3/16 at 8:02 pm
Posted on 11/3/16 at 8:08 pm to slackster
quote:
Tough call, but if you're reasonably healthy, pocket the $30 savings every month until you need it down the road.
yeah, that's what I was leaning towards..in the 5, 6 years I've had this plan, I can count the number of times on one hand that I've had to see the doctor
Posted on 11/3/16 at 8:13 pm to Ellis Dee
quote:
yeah, that's what I was leaning towards..in the 5, 6 years I've had this plan, I can count the number of times on one hand that I've had to see the doctor
My employer offers 3 plans. In the benefits handbook every year they've got a breakdown of your total costs with each plan given 3 or 4 different healthcare scenarios. It is incredibly helpful to see the total costs for each plan - both premiums, deductibles, co-insurance, and total out of pocket caps. What gets me is that we have a PPO plan that is 3x more expensive than the cheapest option and 2x more expensive than the middle of the road plan, yet it is never, under any circumstances, a cheaper total cost than the middle of the road plan. I'm honestly not sure why it is even offered.
Posted on 11/3/16 at 8:23 pm to LSUEEAlum
quote:
united
I have United and it has been really good to my wife and me. It's been way easier to deal with than BCBS ever was, and I'm paying less out of pocket too. If it's offered to you, get the flexible spending account. I'm not sure what our premiums are, because my employer pays them.
Posted on 11/3/16 at 8:33 pm to larry289
The CEO of HCA made $17M last year. In truth, that's pennies in the bucket when considering the entire healthcare market. I'll give you that. I make the example because it's true of not only him but also the CEO's in Pharma, Devices, Insurance, Hospital Execs, etc. Then there's the money returned to investors in the form of dividends. The point is that there are billions of dollars that could be used to provide care which are instead paying for something that may not be actually adding value.
Healthcare costs are driven by numerous factors. I don't want to minimize that as I highlighted only a few. There is no easy fix, make no mistake about it.
Healthcare costs are driven by numerous factors. I don't want to minimize that as I highlighted only a few. There is no easy fix, make no mistake about it.
This post was edited on 11/3/16 at 8:36 pm
Posted on 11/3/16 at 8:47 pm to Canard Noir
quote:
Devil's advocate here because I'm no Democrat and hate my premium as much as the next guy but Ted Cruz and company held it hostage by prolonging the government shutdown when they had to pass one of a few emergency spending bills. Blocking the emergency spending bill had nothing to do with the money, it was to get what they wanted out of the ACA. That's my understanding from what I remember but I could be wrong and it's been a while but to pretend the Act is wholly intact because they had super majority isn't being entirely truthful.
Ted Cruz wasn't even in the Senate when they passed the ACA. Also, ACA spending is mandatory, which means it takes a law to change the spending.
If Republicans were able to change anything in the ACA, it would only happen because President Obama signed it. But none of this has anything to do with what was discussed when we said "Public option."
This post was edited on 11/3/16 at 8:51 pm
Posted on 11/3/16 at 10:39 pm to BACONisMEATcandy
quote:
Ted Cruz wasn't even in the Senate when they passed the ACA
Look, you said that there was no way the bill could get influenced because the Dems had a super majority. I'm saying there were other ways to skin a cat. He was a Senator and he tried a fake filibuster to defund the Act in 2013. He was grandstanding for himself and admitted as much. He couldn't ultimately block the bill but he used the deficit ceiling as leverage to pass a revised version of the ACA. The government shutdown hurt a lot of people because 1 million government employees got furloughed indefinitely and permits weren't issued for businesses who needed them to function. That was his leverage and that's just two of the ways to skin this cat, that's all I was saying.
Posted on 11/3/16 at 11:16 pm to Geekboy
Reap what you sew swamp rats, for perpetually voting for sister Mary Landrieu.
Posted on 11/3/16 at 11:19 pm to wiltznucs
quote:
The CEO of HCA made $17M last year. In truth, that's pennies in the bucket when considering the entire healthcare market. I'll give you that. I make the example because it's true of not only him but also the CEO's in Pharma, Devices, Insurance, Hospital Execs, etc. Then there's the money returned to investors in the form of dividends. The point is that there are billions of dollars that could be used to provide care which are instead paying for something that may not be actually adding value.
I'm not sure what is confusing about this. Insurance companies exist to provide a return on capital to investors, or else investors (we, the public, who own mutual funds, collect pensions, etc.) wouldn't own shares. They are meant to serve as yield vehicles. They provide a service for policyholders in that they pool money together and deploy it as needed for medical purposes. That is the economic value.
I do agree with your sentiments that the lack of transparency on cost for the consumer is probably unparalleled.
This post was edited on 11/3/16 at 11:22 pm
Posted on 11/3/16 at 11:20 pm to oVo
quote:
Don't worry Trump will take care of this
How? By buying across state lines?
Posted on 11/3/16 at 11:20 pm to Epic Cajun
You know how I know you're poor?
Posted on 11/3/16 at 11:21 pm to Geekboy
The statists will tell you it's just greedy insurance companies who are following the rules set forth by Obamacare
Posted on 11/3/16 at 11:31 pm to Dayman
quote:
this shite needs to get fixed ASAP.
Agreed.....but Republicans will not allow tweaks to improve it.....as happened with social security.....Medicare........Obamacare is modeled after a conservative think tank plan.....Obama put that forward in an effort to work with conservatives.....liberals hated the plan from the start...with that said, my insurance as a self employed sole proprietor has gone up at the same rate as before Obama and I get better coverage than before....I am going to check out Obamacare this year to see if it saves me any money. If not, still not a bad price sticking with my private plan.
Posted on 11/4/16 at 12:13 am to Geekboy
My premium went up $10 per paycheck. Family of 4 with no deductible. BCBS
Popular
Back to top


0








