- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jussie Smollett Case - All Charges Dropped - Update
Posted on 2/18/19 at 9:09 am to tgrbaitn08
Posted on 2/18/19 at 9:09 am to tgrbaitn08
quote:
Not really addressed..all she did was blame the police for withholding information.
Yep
She looked so concerned and embarrassed while saying it. She knows she's got egg all over her face.
Posted on 2/18/19 at 9:11 am to Tester1216
But but Trump supporters are racist. 
Posted on 2/18/19 at 9:11 am to TH03
You just want to argue with everything today huh? 
Posted on 2/18/19 at 9:13 am to TheCaterpillar
I’m sure in her opinion she’s addressed it and there will not be an forthcoming apology.
Posted on 2/18/19 at 9:15 am to Ed Osteen
No, I just think this will play out like the other 200 fake instances. The accusers and the ones shouting so loudly about the accused's guilt will apologize with a voice about a tenth as loud. I think people are expecting this to he different when we all know it'll be the same.
Posted on 2/18/19 at 9:21 am to Tester1216
quote:
I’m sure in her opinion she’s addressed it and there will not be an forthcoming apology.
Exactly.
She said "the police lied to me" and tried to take the burden off of her.
Journalists (and I use that term very lightly) are supposed to look at the whole picture, not just regurgitate vague police press releases because it fits her agenda.
fricking embarrassing on their part. They should be ashamed.
Any intelligent, unbiased person could look at the story Jussie told and realize the logistics of the attack were ludicrous.
His story assumed:
1. They knew where he lived.
2. They knew he would leave his apartment at 2 AM to get some food.
3. They waited outside of his apartment at 2 AM in -20 degree weather prepared for the attack.
4. They followed him on foot, going unnoticed in MAGA hats, carrying bleach several blocks to both Walgreens and Subway.
5. They waited outside of Subway, again in -20 degree weather.
6. They beat him up, but only left a single scratch.
7. He punched them back but had no injuries to his hands or arms.
8. He didn't drop his phone or subway salad.
Then on top of that, you have to think about how he didn't call police for 2 hours, didn't take the string off his neck, and wouldn't turn over his phone.
It was so clearly bullshite from the beginning.
Posted on 2/18/19 at 9:22 am to TheCaterpillar
All of that. Well done.
Posted on 2/18/19 at 9:23 am to TH03
I was fricking with you about debating whether Robin Roberts reads her tweets or not
Posted on 2/18/19 at 9:23 am to Tester1216
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/26/23 at 5:31 pm
Posted on 2/18/19 at 9:24 am to TheCaterpillar
We all knew it was bullshite from the MAGA 
Posted on 2/18/19 at 9:24 am to Ed Osteen
Oh, yeah that would be pretty classic me. 
Posted on 2/18/19 at 9:24 am to TH03
quote:
I think people are expecting this to he different when we all know it'll be the same.
Who thinks it'll be different?
I sure as shite don't. We're not going to get shite for an apology from the MSM.
The one thing I hope will be different is that he actually gets prosecuted for this hoax. I have seen some left MSM people saying he should be because of how much it set their "cause" back and the CPD is not happy and the Feds are involved now. I'm not holding my breath though.
Posted on 2/18/19 at 9:28 am to DelU249
quote:
You can tell she didn’t believe him
100% disagree. She acted as if she believed it all during the interview. Her followup comments on GMA after the interview aired confirmed she believed him.
quote:
her questions didn’t reflect that or a desire to run damage control
He questions were soft balls other than asking why he didn't turn over his phone. She didn't ask any hard questions about the timeline or improbable logistics of the alleged attack. It went straight for asking his emotions and how he felt about being attacked.
She identified far too much with the interview subject and looked like she was about to start crying with him.
Posted on 2/18/19 at 9:28 am to stout
Did you just kill space so you wouldn't post that on the bottom of the page?
Posted on 2/18/19 at 9:31 am to TheCaterpillar
All she was worried about was being the only person that was granted the interview....shes a sell out and a horrible person, she didnt care whether or not the story was real...frick her
Posted on 2/18/19 at 9:33 am to LSUJuice
quote:
Did you just kill space so you wouldn't post that on the bottom of the page?
Pretty smart haha
Popular
Back to top


1












