Started By
Message
locked post

Judge Dismisses $1 Billion Lawsuit Against DC Claiming Gentrification Is Racist

Posted on 7/2/18 at 10:35 am
Posted by TigersSEC2010
Warren, Michigan
Member since Jan 2010
38535 posts
Posted on 7/2/18 at 10:35 am
LINK

quote:

A recent lawsuit in Washington, D.C. calls into question the legality of gentrification, as an advocacy group alleges that the city courted “creative-class” millennials in recent years at the expense of longtime Washingtonians, particularly the city’s lower-income African-American residents.


As Governing reports, a federal judge last week dismissed the $1 billion lawsuit, which was filed in June by a civil rights attorney on behalf of three D.C. residents and a local advocacy group. The judge agreed with the city’s claim that the court didn’t have jurisdiction to determine whether housing officials were discriminatory in their efforts to attract young, professional workers.

The judge also says that because the city acted alone in attempts to attract creative-class workers, there was no conspiracy to discriminate against residents based on their income and how they earned a living. The plaintiffs say they plan to appeal and file for a summary judgment.


“The city is intentionally trying to lighten black neighborhoods, and the way they have primarily been doing it is through construction of high-density, luxury buildings that primarily only offer studios and one bedrooms,” the suit reads. “Every city planning agency … conspired to make D.C. very welcoming for preferred residents and sought to displace residents inimical to the creative economy.”



How dare you try to turn this uninhabitable shithole into something desirable!
Posted by Duckhammer_77
TD Platinum member
Member since Nov 2016
3079 posts
Posted on 7/2/18 at 10:38 am to
Encourage residential growth that can support infrastructure tax millage = "lighten" black neighborhoods = bad

Diversity is when blacks can move into white hoods. Racism when whites move into theirs.
This post was edited on 7/2/18 at 10:41 am
Posted by tigerbutt
Deep South
Member since Jun 2006
26445 posts
Posted on 7/2/18 at 10:38 am to
North BR will never have this problem.
Posted by boxcarbarney
Above all things, be a man
Member since Jul 2007
27261 posts
Posted on 7/2/18 at 10:38 am to
Move a bunch of white people in, its gentrification and racist. A bunch of white people flee a crime ridden city, its white flight and racist.
Posted by rowbear1922
Houston, TX
Member since Oct 2008
15825 posts
Posted on 7/2/18 at 10:41 am to
So there is one competent judge in Merica.
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 7/2/18 at 10:43 am to
The anti-gentrification argument has a huge flaw.

People from these neighborhoods are choosing to sell their homes for massive profits to developers or new residents. They are not forced to do this.

I live in a gentrifying area in Nashville and have heard plenty of complaints about it. Our property taxes have barely shifted and the neighborhood has improved infrastructure, food and drink options, etc. and people are choosing to sell their homes for hundreds of thousands more than they bought them.

One black lady once told me at my local dive bar that we (white people) are forcing out black people by making them uncomfortable. We make them feel like they don't belong because we are building nice houses and are all over the streets jogging and walking dogs.

I just had to laugh and walk away.

This post was edited on 7/2/18 at 11:01 am
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
33146 posts
Posted on 7/2/18 at 10:44 am to
Where was the sensitivity when African American residents and progressive forced bussing policies displaced the middle class from those neighborhoods 50 years ago?

This is America. Neighborhoods change. People move around.

Posted by Ash Williams
South of i-10
Member since May 2009
18563 posts
Posted on 7/2/18 at 10:46 am to
quote:

conspired to make D.C. very welcoming for preferred residents and sought to displace residents inimical to the creative economy.


Is this REALLY how they want to sum up their argument?

This is the BEST way to state their conclusion?

Jesus
Posted by SCLSUMuddogs
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2010
8588 posts
Posted on 7/2/18 at 10:49 am to
So both segregation and gentrification are racist?
This post was edited on 7/2/18 at 10:50 am
Posted by Barbellthor
Columbia
Member since Aug 2015
11582 posts
Posted on 7/2/18 at 10:54 am to
quote:

“The city is intentionally trying to lighten black neighborhoods

Not by color, but by economy, lack of crime, and happiness.
quote:

the way they have primarily been doing it is through construction of high-density, luxury buildings that primarily only offer studios and one bedrooms

Where's the problem? Is every major city on the planet now racist?
quote:

Every city planning agency … conspired to make D.C. very welcoming for preferred residents

So no state should ever consider preferred businesses and individuals to attract with their tax laws?
quote:

and sought to displace residents inimical to the creative economy.

And what, pray tell, is wrong with wanting to clean out the trash which stagnates a nation's capital?
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
68603 posts
Posted on 7/2/18 at 10:55 am to
quote:

“The city is intentionally trying to lighten black neighborhoods

Pay back is a bitch isn't it
Posted by BACONisMEATcandy
Member since Dec 2007
46743 posts
Posted on 7/2/18 at 10:56 am to
I bought a house here in a "gentrifying" neighborhood in October and redfin "estimates" it's already worth over $100k more than I paid for it
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 7/2/18 at 10:58 am to
Why can't black people be included in these categories? I see no where that states these types of professionals are only white.

quote:

“creative-class” millennials


quote:

young, professional workers.


quote:

creative-class workers


quote:

preferred residents


And why can't black people live in residences like this?

quote:

high-density, luxury buildings that primarily only offer studios and one bedrooms

Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
85538 posts
Posted on 7/2/18 at 11:00 am to
You’re a racist if you sell it
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
62150 posts
Posted on 7/2/18 at 11:00 am to
quote:

So both segregation and gentrification are racist?


Dude, taking a piss is racist. This stuff is just polarizing white America. On one end, you have the white guilt folks who fall all over themselves to appease the "that's racist" crowd. On the other end, you have whites who are sick and tired of being called racists constantly just because they're white. I honestly believe most on this end don't really have a problem with black people on a personal level, but they resent this stuff and are becoming more bitter all the time.
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
40803 posts
Posted on 7/2/18 at 11:07 am to
quote:

The anti-gentrification argument has a huge flaw.

People from these neighborhoods are choosing to sell their homes for massive profits to developers or new residents. They are not forced to do this.



A lot of them are renters who believe they are entitled to their lease price never changing.

Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 7/2/18 at 11:12 am to
quote:

A lot of them are renters who believe they are entitled to their lease price never changing.



Lol even worse.
Posted by LSUbase13
Mt. Pleasant, SC
Member since Mar 2008
15060 posts
Posted on 7/2/18 at 11:21 am to
quote:

“The city is intentionally trying to lighten black neighborhoods, and the way they have primarily been doing it is through construction of high-density, luxury buildings that primarily only offer studios and one bedrooms,” the suit reads.


Younger people want to live in the city nowadays. They don't want to face 30+ minute commutes. The 4/4, 3000 square foot white picket fence house in the burbs isn't as appealing or enticing to the younger crowd anymore. They value being closer to work, coffee shops, local breweries, and trendy restaurants close by. Developers are essentially buying up a lot of shitty homes for cheap and flipping them or building row houses and town homes all across the more popular cities.

The younger generation doesn't mind living in a town home or former studio in a refurbished warehouse (which is what I originally bought) to enjoy the perks of the city.

I never really saw it as "racist".
This post was edited on 7/2/18 at 11:23 am
Posted by real turf fan
East Tennessee
Member since Dec 2016
12217 posts
Posted on 7/2/18 at 11:25 am to
quote:

longtime Washingtonians, particularly the city’s lower-income African-American residents.


Point of Order: define long term.

My great-Uncle retired from the diplomatic corps (as did my Grandfather.) My Grandfather chose to return to his home town, Uncle Louie chose D.C.

He chose a brick Craftsman House in the northeast side of the city. A street with a lot of retired diplomats where people didn't lock their doors. The last time I visited him he looked out the front door and was shocked that a black man was delivering his mail. (This from a man who had spent a lot of time in Rio de Janiero and had fabulous pictures of Christ the Redeemer looking out over a very nice and safe Brazilian city.) My visit, the last one, was fifty five years ago.

Posted by LSU Coyote
Member since Sep 2007
56970 posts
Posted on 7/2/18 at 11:29 am to
quote:

North BR will never have this problem.


It would make my drive to Exxon a hella lot shorter.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram