Started By
Message

re: JD Powers report is out and Tesla is dead last is problems reported by owners.

Posted on 6/24/20 at 5:49 pm to
Posted by Cdawg
TigerFred's Living Room
Member since Sep 2003
62227 posts
Posted on 6/24/20 at 5:49 pm to
Tesla^

^Brand is not rank eligible because it does not meet study award criteria.



double Hmmmm.....
Posted by momentoftruth87
Your mom
Member since Oct 2013
86110 posts
Posted on 6/24/20 at 5:51 pm to
quote:

JD Powers


Isn't this a "purchased award" for marketing?
Posted by goofball
Member since Mar 2015
17356 posts
Posted on 6/24/20 at 5:51 pm to
quote:

That Initial quality study is 90 fricking days.

Nobody gives a shite about quality over 90 fricking days.




It's a measure of build quality. It probably means more to manufacturers than to consumers.

The dependability study is separate. You'll see Lexus, Toyota, and Buick topping those.

Posted by eScott
Member since Oct 2008
11376 posts
Posted on 6/24/20 at 5:52 pm to
quote:

What happened to Honda and Toyota?


They didn't pay as much as the other companies.

quote:

J.D. Power collects information regarding consumers' likes, dislikes, habits and tastes regarding the selection, purchase and satisfaction with a given product, then packages this valuable information and sells it to the producers of the product
Posted by atrueamerican
New England
Member since Oct 2019
508 posts
Posted on 6/24/20 at 5:54 pm to
You trust public surveys that JD Powers uses?

Probably a bunch of boomers submitting surveys who can’t figure out how to work the “computer” in their car.
Posted by jimdog
columbus, ga
Member since Dec 2012
6636 posts
Posted on 6/24/20 at 6:00 pm to
You're right. Basically things not working, things falling off or improperly fitted. Slip shod workmanship. Which is a huge problem for Tesla given they have very few dealership workshops to correct the haphazard manufacturing. People are enraged at buying an expensive vehicle then having it sit idle and unusable for long periods. They then must make arrangements to get it to the nearest repair facility and parts are not available. I've heard some horror stories.
Posted by jimdog
columbus, ga
Member since Dec 2012
6636 posts
Posted on 6/24/20 at 6:06 pm to
What that means is they were only rated in 35 states (which is enough) since the sales saturation (numbers sold) was not high enough in the others.
This post was edited on 6/24/20 at 6:07 pm
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
141286 posts
Posted on 6/24/20 at 6:09 pm to
quote:

JD Powers


Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29134 posts
Posted on 6/24/20 at 6:11 pm to
quote:

What that means is they were only rated in 35 states (which is enough) since the sales saturation (numbers sold) was not high enough in the others.

That's not the reason at all.
quote:

it should be noted that about two-thirds of Tesla's sales occur in the 15 states in which we cannot collect owner insights
Posted by 10MTNTiger
Banks of the Guadalupe
Member since Sep 2012
4139 posts
Posted on 6/24/20 at 6:23 pm to
I’ll see your stupid JD Power ranking and raise you this little chart...you tell me which one is a better indicator of brand quality...I’ll be waiting.

Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
135363 posts
Posted on 6/24/20 at 6:25 pm to
quote:

Nobody gives a shite about quality over 90 fricking days.
I do.

I hate buying a new car and the next day I have to take it back to the dealership to get a problem fixed. And, yes, that has happened to me.

I care a LOT about that. Most people do.
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
31228 posts
Posted on 6/24/20 at 6:51 pm to
quote:

Isn't this a "purchased award" for marketing?


In general yes. Their money comes from the auto industry.

If you want the "best" reliability and dependability information on the auto industry it is Consumer Reports. It is far from perfect but you won't see numbers and "awards" that defy all logic from anyone that follows the industry. CR (AKA Consumer Union) doesn't even allow their name to be used to promote products, they do an admirable job of insulating themselves from those they report on.

That said the current trends defy some long held beliefs.

Porsche is near or at the top and Genesis, Audi, BWM, Subaru, Madza and Hyundai have been on a steady rise, while Honda, Lexus and Toyota have dipped (particularly Honda/Acura). Most of Big 3 all tend to languish in the mid to lower levels. The usual bottom feeders Fiat, Land Rover, Jag and Jeep have greeted Mitsubishi, Chevy, GMC and Caddy in their current dips.
Posted by EA6B
TX
Member since Dec 2012
14754 posts
Posted on 6/24/20 at 7:09 pm to
Anyone worried about quality is buying a Honda or Toyota, people buy Tesla’s to make a statement.
Posted by PrivatePublic
Member since Nov 2012
17848 posts
Posted on 6/24/20 at 8:07 pm to
quote:

I hate buying a new car and the next day I have to take it back to the dealership to get a problem fixed. And, yes, that has happened to me.


Ok fine, but just like police brutality, you're talking extremely small sample size.

But for the long haul, what everyone really cares about is dependability, so in a sense this study doesn't mean shite.
Posted by LSUtigerME
Walker, LA
Member since Oct 2012
3964 posts
Posted on 6/24/20 at 8:18 pm to
How do these studies weigh the average “complaint”?

Somebody buying a $85k+ Model S from a non-dealership, with the level of complexity/advanced technology of a Tesla, will likely have a lot more questions and minor concerns. Not to mention small tech bugs that may need to be addressed. It’s likely a much more informed buyer as well.

Meanwhile Joe Plumber who bought a Chevy Truck will likely not be bothered by a trim misalignment. However, when his transmission falls out or his transfer case locks up, he’s gonna be pretty upset.

So does this study/survey view all complaints as equal?
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
74688 posts
Posted on 6/24/20 at 8:21 pm to
quote:

JD Powers report is out and Tesla is dead last is problems reported by owners.


quote:

Worse they were last by a long hot! The ratings are based on new owner complaints per 100 vehicles.


Are you like in the early stages of learning to speak English or something?
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
135363 posts
Posted on 6/24/20 at 8:27 pm to
quote:

so in a sense this study doesn't mean shite.
If so, why are you so bent out of shape about it?
Posted by S1C EM
Athens, GA
Member since Nov 2007
11594 posts
Posted on 6/24/20 at 8:27 pm to
DODGE at the top? List is shite.
Posted by S1C EM
Athens, GA
Member since Nov 2007
11594 posts
Posted on 6/24/20 at 8:30 pm to
quote:

The dependability study is separate from this and it measures reliability. Dodge, Fiat, Land Rover, Jeep, and Ford are near the bottom in that study. Lexus, Toyota, and Buick usually score near the top.


Ahhhh......carry on then.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29134 posts
Posted on 6/24/20 at 8:51 pm to
quote:

How do these studies weigh the average “complaint”?
quote:

So does this study/survey view all complaints as equal?
JDPower says this:
quote:

Initial quality is determined by the number of problems experienced per 100 vehicles (PP100)
Which says to me it is unweighted. I also found this autoblog article which goes into detail about how bunk these rankings are.
quote:

no attempt is made to differentiate BIG problems from minor ones. Thus a transmission or engine failure counts the same as a squeaky glove box door, tricky phone pairing, inconsistent voice recognition, or anything else that annoys the owner.
quote:

But what "quality" should not mean, is subjective likeability: ease of operation of the radio, climate controls, or seat adjusters, phone pairing, music downloading, sizes of touch pads on an infotainment screen, quickness of system response, or accuracy of voice-recognition. These are ergonomic "human factors" issues, not "quality" problems.

Yet these kinds of pleasability issues are now dominating today's JDP "quality" ratings. "Cars and trucks have never been built better, but frustration with audio, infotainment, and navigation features on new vehicles has never been worse," Automotive News senior writer Jesse Snyder pointed out back in 2012. "For the first time, complaints about such features surpassed those about engines and transmissions as the top category... [And] half the problems reported by vehicle owners after 90 days were design related – things that are confusing or hard to use rather than faulty or broken."

It's a 223 question form, and it does seem that the tiniest annoyance counts the same as a total drivetrain failure.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram