Started By
Message
locked post

Initial Jobless Claims 3.2mm

Posted on 3/26/20 at 7:31 am
Posted by hubreb
Member since Nov 2008
2165 posts
Posted on 3/26/20 at 7:31 am
Double estimates
Posted by PiscesTiger
Concrete, WA
Member since Feb 2004
53696 posts
Posted on 3/26/20 at 7:33 am to
Pardon?
Posted by elcid
Band Camp
Member since Mar 2007
3036 posts
Posted on 3/26/20 at 7:33 am to
Just released? Damnit, this is going to get ugly. I already know people in LA and in CA who have been let go and had to let go of staff.
Posted by Splackavellie
Bayou
Member since Oct 2017
13055 posts
Posted on 3/26/20 at 7:33 am to
More to come.
Posted by terd ferguson
Darren Wilson Fan Club President
Member since Aug 2007
114938 posts
Posted on 3/26/20 at 7:34 am to
3.2 millimeters doesn't seem like much
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
24485 posts
Posted on 3/26/20 at 7:35 am to
3.2 is only higher because they didn’t think they’d be able to process that many. Way more then 3.2 mil have lost jobs
Posted by hubreb
Member since Nov 2008
2165 posts
Posted on 3/26/20 at 7:35 am to
Guessing next week will be 7-10mm
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
141237 posts
Posted on 3/26/20 at 7:36 am to
Won't surprise me if it reaches 10M. What is the workforce size, is it 100M? So 10%?

Good news is this is likely short term for at least 2/3 of those.
Posted by Boudreaux35
BR
Member since Sep 2007
22281 posts
Posted on 3/26/20 at 7:36 am to
That's only about 1/8th inch. I'm not worried yet. Oh, and what the frick's with the metric crap?
Posted by PhiTiger1764
Lurker since Aug 2003
Member since Oct 2009
14616 posts
Posted on 3/26/20 at 7:41 am to
quote:

Won't surprise me if it reaches 10M. What is the workforce size, is it 100M? So 10%?

I would like someone familiar with this to break it down for me like I’m 12.

The unemployment rate was 3.5% last month. How is that number calculated? I’m assuming the workforce size must be much lower than 100M based on that.

And what is the unemployment rate now based on the new info?
Posted by hubreb
Member since Nov 2008
2165 posts
Posted on 3/26/20 at 7:47 am to
quote:

would like someone familiar with this to break it down for me like I’m 12.

The unemployment rate was 3.5% last month. How is that number calculated? I’m assuming the workforce size must be much lower than 100M based on that.

And what is the unemployment rate now based on the new info?


The jobless claims numbers come from state's weekly actual new filings for unemployment insurance

The unemployment rate is done by phone survey

Payrolls are done by company reported hiring and firing
Posted by hubreb
Member since Nov 2008
2165 posts
Posted on 3/26/20 at 7:49 am to
quote:

That's only about 1/8th inch. I'm not worried yet. Oh, and what the frick's with the metric crap?



In the institutional finance world...where you deal in millions...one "m" = 000...two equal million
Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 3/26/20 at 7:51 am to
quote:

Good news is this is likely short term for at least 2/3 of those.


A glimmer of hope a lot on that number are furloughed folks, though it’s just a small glimmer.


A jaw dropping number no matter how you slice it though. This thing may take years to recover from.
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
61052 posts
Posted on 3/26/20 at 7:54 am to
Holy shite
Posted by PhiTiger1764
Lurker since Aug 2003
Member since Oct 2009
14616 posts
Posted on 3/26/20 at 7:55 am to
quote:

The unemployment rate is done by phone survey

Interesting... had no idea that’s how it was done.

Do you have any guess at what the unemployment rate is now based on this info?
Posted by zacata88
Member since Mar 2014
1682 posts
Posted on 3/26/20 at 7:57 am to
Obviously the cumulative number will rise, but this might be the largest single number we see. A lot of bartenders, servers, etc. lost their jobs right away.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
78046 posts
Posted on 3/26/20 at 7:59 am to
This is fine.

Yea, totally fine and worth it.

We’re only destroying people’s lives.

But it’s ok.
Posted by windshieldman
Member since Nov 2012
12818 posts
Posted on 3/26/20 at 8:01 am to
I think it’s easy for us who have “essential” jobs (I’m ems) to go to, or didn’t work, or parents help them out, to say we have to keep the country shut down. It’s another thing to be forced into no longer receiving a paycheck and no help other than a few thousand coming from a stimulus. I cannot fathom that situation, especially not knowing how long this will last.

I truly hate this for anyone unemployed or about to be, especially these small business owners having to lay folks off, I can’t imagine. Horrible times, I know many disagree but at some point we gonna have to open shite back up. We don’t need suicides, homelessness, to outpace folks dying from corona. Not saying that would happen but if we are shutdown for several more months then who knows.
This post was edited on 3/26/20 at 8:05 am
Posted by ELLSSUU
Member since Jan 2005
8156 posts
Posted on 3/26/20 at 8:05 am to
quote:

Good news is this is likely short term for at least 2/3 of those.


Serious question. Educate me here on why so many think this is short term.

Yes COVID goes away but I’m not convinced a switch is suddenly switched back on for employment and spending. Mom and pop (small business) companies that sink don’t unsink quickly.
Posted by OysterPoBoy
City of St. George
Member since Jul 2013
45559 posts
Posted on 3/26/20 at 8:06 am to
quote:

3.2 millimeters


It’s metric. When you do the conversion it’s quite significant.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram