- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
If airlines actually cared about passengers...
Posted on 11/8/18 at 2:10 pm
Posted on 11/8/18 at 2:10 pm
1. Board from the back. It would be much faster and efficient.
2. Get rid of the 3 3 configuration. It sucks.
2. Get rid of the 3 3 configuration. It sucks.
22
Posted on 11/8/18 at 2:11 pm to Tigertown in ATL
They would offer Capri Suns to drink
Posted on 11/8/18 at 2:13 pm to Tigertown in ATL
quote:
Board from the back. It would be much faster and efficient.
so then you would have to bitch about going onto the ramp and drag you and your shite up air stairs, mmmmmk
quote:
Get rid of the 3 3 configuration. It sucks.
how would you propose rearranging the narrow body configuration then baw?
Posted on 11/8/18 at 2:16 pm to 777Tiger
Boooo
No need for that shite here
No need for that shite here
Posted on 11/8/18 at 2:17 pm to Tigertown in ATL
quote:
If airlines actually cared about passengers...
They would stop purchasing planes that nose-dive into the Pacific
Posted on 11/8/18 at 2:18 pm to Tigertown in ATL
They would also clean up fecal matter from the seats before a passenger sits in it
This post was edited on 11/8/18 at 2:18 pm
Posted on 11/8/18 at 2:19 pm to Cump11b
quote:
They would stop purchasing planes that nose-dive into the Pacific
yeah I'm sure they set out to purchase planes that were going to cost them millions of dollars in lawsuits after they crash and kill a bunch of people. brilliant business plan if you ask me
Posted on 11/8/18 at 2:21 pm to tigerfoot
quote:
No need for that shite here
pretty whiny assed OP, imo, can't board narrow bodies from the rear using jet bridges and 3 & 3 in narrow bodies not going away, a more sensible solution is to put your cell phone down and not try to carry your grandmother in a steamer trunk as a carry on to expedite boarding, same as deplaning, if everyone just stayed seated(and off their phone,) until each row in front of them stood up, got their steamer trunks and moved, it would expedite that process as well
This post was edited on 11/8/18 at 2:23 pm
Posted on 11/8/18 at 2:23 pm to Tigertown in ATL
No company actually "cares" about customers any further than is required to make the most money possible.
Posted on 11/8/18 at 2:24 pm to Tigertown in ATL
I think he means call out the passengers in the back to board first.
And I agree.
And I agree.
Posted on 11/8/18 at 2:25 pm to 777Tiger
I think he means board the people in the back of the plane first
Posted on 11/8/18 at 2:25 pm to 777Tiger
quote:
if everyone just stayed seated(and off their phone,) until each row in front of them stood up
People that rush to deplane ahead of the rows in front of them should be shot.
Posted on 11/8/18 at 2:26 pm to Tigertown in ATL
quote:
Get rid of the 3 3 configuration. It sucks.
Not sure how you do this since most of the popular planes in existence are this configuration. I don't know how else you could configure them.
Posted on 11/8/18 at 2:27 pm to pngtiger
quote:
I think he means board the people in the back of the plane first
airlines try to do that, that's what the boarding group number on your ticket is for, but with the me first/rules are for everyone else society we have, that isn't a very effective approach, airlines are always looking at how to improve things, it's the passengers that don't seem to want to cooperate
Posted on 11/8/18 at 2:29 pm to Tigertown in ATL
Hot MILFs giving handies on red eyes.
Posted on 11/8/18 at 2:29 pm to Tigertown in ATL
And make them put their carry-on on their aisle instead of wherever they choose
Posted on 11/8/18 at 2:30 pm to deeprig9
quote:
If airlines actually cared about passengers...
I think he means call out the passengers in the back to board first.
And I agree.
Airlines used to do this. Problem is when they started charging for checking a bag people all want to get on first to make sure they get an overhead spot. No one wants to check a bag for $25
People in the back of the plane are those without status. People with status believe they should get overhead space.
Solution is you "rent" an overhead space for the flight then no one else can take it. Measure the bag and that's the space you get. That's a crapton of work though
Posted on 11/8/18 at 2:31 pm to redneck
Sarcasm baw... sarcasm.
Posted on 11/8/18 at 2:32 pm to Buckeye06
quote:
No one wants to check a bag for $25
when the overhead space fills up, or is considered filled up, to expedite boarding, most airlines, a least the big ones, offer to check your bag for free
Posted on 11/8/18 at 2:32 pm to Buckeye06
quote:
No one wants to check a bag for $25
I'd pay $25 bucks to NOT check a bag. If you check a bag for any trip a week or less I know you aren't a seasoned traveler and are a chump.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News