- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 12/19/20 at 10:14 am to FlyFisherman
quote:
Would you shut the frick up with your un-substantiated bullshite? Look I’m gonna get the vaccine too but to say it wasn’t rushed is ridiculous.
Vaccines are typically tested on animals for a long period prior to human trials. Once it’s safety and efficacy are verified does it move on to human phased trials. How long was this vaccine tested on animals compared to a typical vaccine? This has little to nothing to do with government interference btw.
The COVID-19 vaccines might feel rushed, but they aren’t
quote:
So about 10 years ago the science wheels started churning out strategies to vaccinate against SARS1. Unfortunately, funding dried up for SARS1 as that virus never made its way to the U.S., so a vaccine didn’t actually get developed. However, the research on the virus and ideas of how to vaccinate against it were already available.
quote:
Thankfully SARS2 (SARS-CoV-2, our current situation) uses almost the exact same version of that protein to infect cells and uses the exact same receptor on human cells. Due to these similarities, scientists were able to pick up where they left off, which sped up the process dramatically.
Further, vaccination strategies have improved significantly in the last 10-plus years, particularly in the past couple of years with the mRNA technology that Moderna and Pfizer have utilized. All of these companies basically just took the DNA or RNA backbone of a vaccine that they had already built and plugged in the SARS2 spike protein’s genetic information.
quote:
That said, the real question is about the human trials. Our country has set up a network of clinical trials with an extremely high bar, particularly with vaccines. The COVID-19 vaccine candidates have not skipped any of the safety trials and measurements necessary, and they haven’t skipped any of the efficacy ones either. It’s been fast in part because people have been so eager to volunteer for the trials, and because the virus has spread like wildfire, infecting a staggering amount of people.
Posted on 12/19/20 at 10:14 am to FlyFisherman
Dp
This post was edited on 12/19/20 at 10:15 am
Posted on 12/19/20 at 10:15 am to Ingeniero
quote:
The COVID-19 vaccines might feel rushed, but they aren’t
completely false. once again the pharma companies cherry picked trial participants knowing there are many folks who would have dangerous reactions.
Just search up the articles on polyethylene glycol reactions.
Posted on 12/19/20 at 10:21 am to notsince98
quote:
once again the pharma companies cherry picked trial participants
You mean high risk individuals? And yes, they most definitely screened out anyone who is allergic to any component of it. That's not shenanigans, that's common sense and standard procedure.
Posted on 12/19/20 at 10:22 am to FlyFisherman
quote:
Would you shut the frick up with your un-substantiated bullshite? Look I’m gonna get the vaccine too but to say it wasn’t rushed is ridiculous.
Vaccines are typically tested on animals for a long period prior to human trials. Once it’s safety and efficacy are verified does it move on to human phased trials. How long was this vaccine tested on animals compared to a typical vaccine? This has little to nothing to do with government interference btw.
Are you also saying that the CV19 vaccine wasn’t sped up by the use of adaptive trials? If so, you are once again wrong.
They also compressed testing phases to speed up the trials.
I’m all for the vaccine, but you sir, are full of shite.

Every single step was followed. The only difference between this vaccine development and the measles development was the fact that money was no object, there was no red tape, every modern country around the world was working on it simultaneously. mRNA vaccines have been in development for a while. The vaccines were tested in monkeys and mice too. The only reason they weren’t tested on monkeys for years is because they worked right away.
Don’t confuse something happening quickly with something being rushed. Saying it was rushed implies they cut corners, and I see no evidence that happened.
Posted on 12/19/20 at 10:23 am to Chucktown_Badger
quote:
You mean high risk individuals? And yes, they most definitely screened out anyone who is allergic to any component of it. That's not shenanigans, that's common sense and standard procedure.
no. they didn't include people with common allergies or even minor health conditions. they limited participation to only the perfectly healthy.
now the vaccine is said to be safe for everyone despite not being tested on everyone. vaccine safety studies are a damn joke and nobody is holding them responsible.
This post was edited on 12/19/20 at 10:24 am
Posted on 12/19/20 at 10:26 am to Tigers0891
quote:
Everyone knows you're an RN. Congratulations again. If you're getting the vaccine, why the frick does it matter if someone else doesn't?
Go decorate a white board and when you're done with that, wake someone up to give them their sleep medication
You are brilliant. This goes for you saying this is just a cold as well.
What research are you basing your opinions on? You asking why does it matter if someone else doesn't is a real insightful question..

There are a bunch of people commenting as if they know everything about this virus and the vaccine. Its okay to admit that the shite you say is just your opinion.
I only know what I read and its hard to know what is 100% accurate, but I try to use a little common sense to piece things together.
The reason it matters whether other RNs get the vaccine or not is because they can still get it and spread it to patients or anyone else that hasn't been vaccinated.
And its not "just a cold" as you said in another post. My mom got it in July. She is a healthy 74 year old who is always on the go. If she has a cold, she still doesn't stop. This had her unable to get out of bed for 2 weeks. When she did have to get out, she said it took so much energy out of her that all she wanted to do was sleep.. and not move.
After about 2 weeks she started feeling better and while she is pretty much back to normal, ever since having it, she can't do everything she used to without having to stop and rest for a little while. But from now on, when someone gets it and has a bad experience with it, I will just let them know that Tiger0891 from the OT says its just a cold.
Posted on 12/19/20 at 10:29 am to OweO
quote:
The reason it matters whether other RNs get the vaccine or not is because they can still get it and spread it to patients or anyone else that hasn't been vaccinated.
they can still get it and spread it with the vaccine.
and you ignore the incredibly high percentages of asymptomatic.
This post was edited on 12/19/20 at 10:31 am
Posted on 12/19/20 at 10:41 am to fargobison
quote:
am a critical care RN. One of the first patients I had developed GBS from covid. There is research on post covid issues. 60 minutes had a segment on it, a hospital in NY created a unit specificaly for these peope...
First of all, thank you for your efforts. I am curious though, are you sure the GBS was a direct result of Covid? This is a NOVEL virus, and therefore we were literally throwing the kitchen sink at these people. Trying everything and learning as we went, experimental drugs included. To attribute GBS directly to Covid is a tad reckless, but that’s just my opinion.
quote:
People with ME/CFS, and possibly the post-COVID long haulers, may have an ongoing low level of inflammation in the brain, or decreased blood flow to the brain, or an autoimmune condition in which the body makes antibodies that attack the brain, or several of these abnormalities.
Do you think this could be at all attributed to hypoxia? I have literally seen people walk into the ED with AMS with an O2 sat in the 40’s with matching numbers on ABG and normal CO2 in no respiratory distress, Covid +. Family brought them in because of AMS, not Covid. Where you and I both know the reason for the AMS.
What percentage of these patients are you seeing that were on ECMO and remained hypoxic? Or were fortunate enough to avoid ECMO but suffered barotrauma from the extremely high PEEP due to the inability to oxygenate, even on paralytics? We are seeing a large percentage of fibrotic lung tissue in these patients that will never recover.
Initially we thought there was a connection between ischemic MI and Covid. Because there is definitely a connection with Covid and coagulopathy disorders. Now we are learning these Covid NSTEMI’s are NOT the result of ischemia, rather it is the result of hypoxia and the subsequent myocardial damage.
My point is we don’t really know a lot about this Novel virus and it’s long term effects. At this point it’s all mostly speculation.
This post was edited on 12/19/20 at 1:18 pm
Posted on 12/19/20 at 10:52 am to Ingeniero
quote:
The COVID-19 vaccine candidates have not skipped any of the safety trials and measurements necessary, and they haven’t skipped any of the efficacy ones either.
I never said they were “skipped”. I did say they used adaptive and compressed clinical trials, which they did. This process “sped” up the approval process. That is just a FACT. Again I’m all for the vaccine.
I appreciate the Salt Lake paper link as well, but I prefer peer reviewed journals for my information. I know everyone is saying SARS1 and MERS vaccine research gave us a leg up on this, and I’m sure it did. However surely you are aware those were completely different approaches to the vaccine as well, as Both first clinical trials were based on DNA vaccines encoding the spike (S) glycoprotein and the results of the SARS-CoV vaccine have not been published yet.
Posted on 12/19/20 at 11:01 am to slackster
quote:
Every single step was followed.
Never said they weren’t. Did you read my post or just have difficulty with comprehension?
quote:
The only difference between this vaccine development and the measles development was the fact that money was no object
Oh really? That’s the only difference huh?



For the love of god, please nobody listen to this retard.
Posted on 12/19/20 at 11:24 am to FlyFisherman
quote:
Oh really? That’s the only difference huh?

Long term risks of coronavirus are unknown
Risks of mRNA vaccine for coronavirus are unknown
Insert politics and everyone is a genius with a crystal ball
Posted on 12/19/20 at 12:03 pm to FlyFisherman
quote:
Oh really? That’s the only difference huh?
For the love of god, please nobody listen to this retard.
That and 70 years of medical developments.
Why don’t you fill us in on what corners we’re cut?
Posted on 12/19/20 at 12:32 pm to slackster
quote:
That and 70 years of medical developments.
But wait, you just said the ONLY difference was money, more countries involved and no red tape. Do you need me to re-copy YOUR post for YOU?
quote:
Why don’t you fill us in on what corners we’re cut?
Again, I didn’t say corners were cut. I did say they were sped up. This is a fact. Again this comes back to that whole comprehension thing you seem to struggle with.
As far as the differences between measles vaccine and CV19 vaccine I thought you already knew all this? I mean you just posted the ONLY differences. Do I need to re-post YOUR post for YOU again? Judging by your posts, you seem to deal a lot in absolutes and seem to “think” you know everything. I’m sure you have google. You look up the differences. There are a LOT.
You see, this is what happens when you don’t know what the frick you are talking about and get smacked down upon. Have a nice day.
Posted on 12/20/20 at 4:09 pm to slackster
quote:
This works both ways.
Not really, you see, I quit worrying about the virus in April.
Posted on 12/20/20 at 4:40 pm to concrete_tiger
He’s a wannabe know it all, that in reality is a low IQ individual who doesn’t know shite.
Posted on 12/20/20 at 5:45 pm to lsunurse
quote:
If you really are an RN and are refusing this vaccine (not because of legit reasons that make you not a candidate for the vaccine) you are a complete idiot and a disgrace to the nursing profession imo.
I’m an RN and not an idiot so I will be getting the vaccine as soon as I possibly can. Thankfully my friends in nursing and other medical fields here are all also getting the vaccine as soon as they are allowed to.
If you are under 50 you do not need the vax. If you have symptoms, then go to the doc soon. If you test positive for COVID, Get treated early with HCQ, Zpack, and Zinc. You should feel better the next day.
Italy banned HCQ and they had the worst results in the world. There are at least 195 studies that indicate HCQ works. Many of these studies were more thorough than the vax study.
Also, how do they know how dangerous COVID really is?
If you have the flu, then have a heart attack and die, you are counted as a heart attack death.
If you have COVID, then have a heart attack and die, you are counted as a COVID death.
This has been done with many medical issues. Over 10,000 people on hospice dies and were positive for COVID. Yes, they were counted as COVID deaths. How many flu deaths are counted this way?
The inconsistent way they are calculating these deaths makes it impossible to truly evaluate the danger of this illness compared to the common flu.
There is also a study claiming that 75,000 to 100,000 more people died because they were not given HCQ.
Posted on 12/20/20 at 5:50 pm to obdobd918
That is a firehose of undiluted disinformation.
Posted on 12/20/20 at 5:53 pm to obdobd918
quote:
If you are under 50 you do not need the vax. If you have symptoms, then go to the doc soon. If you test positive for COVID, Get treated early with HCQ, Zpack, and Zinc. You should feel better the next day.
If you are an obese person with diabetes...you better be getting the vaccince as soon as possible.
Back to top
