Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

How often do TV channels and cable providers renew their contracts.

Posted on 12/30/18 at 7:39 pm
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
178325 posts
Posted on 12/30/18 at 7:39 pm
Seems like every few months one of the local channels is bitching about Cox wanting too much money and threatening to pull them off the air. Now WGMB is bitching about Cox and that we’re gonna miss the NFC Championship Game. Oh no
Posted by Passing Wind
Dutchtown
Member since Apr 2015
4867 posts
Posted on 12/30/18 at 8:18 pm to
Frick Cox. DirectTv Now stream for the win
Posted by Konkey Dong
Member since Aug 2013
2385 posts
Posted on 12/30/18 at 8:34 pm to
Antenna + tivo = problem solved
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
38661 posts
Posted on 12/30/18 at 8:41 pm to
quote:

How often do TV channels and cable providers renew their contracts.

They all have different contracts ending at different dates. It’s common for contracts to end with the year, but the cable and sat providers try to stagger them so that they’re not negotiating with everyone at once.
This post was edited on 12/30/18 at 8:44 pm
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
38661 posts
Posted on 12/30/18 at 8:43 pm to
quote:

Antenna + tivo = problem solved

I know I won’t miss a playoff game.
Posted by SeeeeK
some where
Member since Sep 2012
30763 posts
Posted on 12/30/18 at 8:45 pm to
All depends

The Fox Sports channels, especially the ones with large audiences for sports, try to renegotiate every 2-3 years, so they can frick the customer over more often.

Carriers try to stop it, but consumers are retards and side with the networks, and bend over and take that next rate increase.

Dish network has tried to get direct, att,spectrum, etc to stand together and stop the gouging, but Direct,att,spectrum are scumbags, who hope another carrier gets in a beef so they can steal their customers, then cry when they lose people.

I loved it when the local Fox network played hard ball, Dish network sent everyone of their stl customers free antennas, so they could get fox 2 for free.

Local carrier caved

Posted by weadjust
Member since Aug 2012
15814 posts
Posted on 12/30/18 at 8:51 pm to
Directv dropped the Weather Channel for 3 months over a 1 cent per customer increase demanded by TWC.
Posted by dawgsjlw
shite hole with your momma
Member since Sep 2014
826 posts
Posted on 12/30/18 at 9:03 pm to
Do people really still pay for cable? Is this is the 1980s?
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
135363 posts
Posted on 12/30/18 at 9:06 pm to
quote:

Seems like every few months one of the local channels is bitching about Cox wanting too much money and threatening to pull them off the air.
You got that backwards. Cox pays the local channels.
Posted by saintsfan1977
Arkansas, from Cajun country
Member since Jun 2010
10505 posts
Posted on 12/30/18 at 9:35 pm to
quote:

Frick Cox. DirectTv Now stream for the win
frick both. IPTV for the win.
Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
36654 posts
Posted on 12/30/18 at 11:03 pm to
I get and DVR local channels free. I don't see why cable/satellite providers can't manage the same and I don't see why locals would charge them. All of that to say I don't know which side thinks they should get money, but neither should, and I haven't had to worry about that in a while.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29134 posts
Posted on 12/31/18 at 2:07 am to
quote:

I get and DVR local channels free. I don't see why cable/satellite providers can't manage the same
Because you can't rebroadcast someone else's content without permission.
quote:

and I don't see why locals would charge them
Because they can.
quote:

All of that to say I don't know which side thinks they should get money
The locals think they should get money from the cable companies, and they do.

The Cable Act passed in 1992 I believe, and it gives local stations the option to charge cable operators for their content (in which case the cable company can decline), or give their content for free (in which case the cable company MUST carry the channel).

The local networks really didn't ask for much until the last 10 or 15 years, but then they realized that they could extract big bucks from the cable companies while consumers would blame the cable companies for the rate hikes.

I post about this a lot, this fricked up market where an increase in competition actually results in higher prices rather than lower. Consumers prefer the locals and cable channels in one interface, so both the networks and the cable providers want the locals in the cable lineup. The networks always have a local monopoly (for their own content), but when a cable provider also has a local monopoly, the cable company has the leverage because they will get the subscribers whether they carry a particular local channel or not. But when a competitor to the cable company moves in (like AT&T's Uverse a little over a decade ago), the leverage shifts completely back to the local station. They can basically start a bid war for their content because carrying the locals is a huge advantage in a competitive market. So then the locals start playing hardball, increasing rates with each new contract, and the consumers get fricked in this type of competitive market.



We are seeing the same shite with the streaming TV services. In most markets, increasing competition results in prices decreasing. Instead, as more streaming services have cropped up, pricing have been increasing. More competitors just means more bidders fighting over the same content, so prices go up.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram