Started By
Message

re: How much of the flooding can be attributed to irresponsible development?

Posted on 8/16/16 at 12:56 pm to
Posted by rantfan
new iberia la
Member since Nov 2012
14110 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

 'Green infrastructure'


What like trees and grass?
Posted by RockAndRollDetective
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2014
4506 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 12:57 pm to
It's not typical particularly in this case but in my neighborhood this is exactly what happened. There is a new development to the east side that blocked the flow of water to a creek on that side that had served as natural drainage since the early 60s. The neighborhood only flooded on the east side. There are several people planning on suing as a result.
Posted by Tiger Ryno
#WoF
Member since Feb 2007
108716 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 12:59 pm to
This is what I'm talking about. It stands to reason if I build up my yard so high then my neighbor is going to get flooded when it rains too much.
Posted by the LSUSaint
Member since Nov 2009
15444 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 1:01 pm to
Not much if any at all. Theese rainfall amounts in short time is unprecedented and would flood nine out of ten areas of the country.

As far as Laffayette, it rained just about daily before, so the ground was pretty saturated already.

It happens. It happened a 100 yrs ago as well before all the development.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
135363 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

What's the word in La?
Rain.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91871 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

Those only flooded because of "flash" flooding may have an argument.


Definitely. If done incorrectly or neglected, development can exacerbate flash flooding problems. The slightest blockage in the system can be a major issue.
Posted by TigerstuckinMS
Member since Nov 2005
33687 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

This was a act of God event


I thought that bastard said "no more floods".
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

You are the 1st to say it's a huge problem...everyone else saying it's not. What is your evidence


I work in the field and regularly see flooding issues in areas that dont have a history of flooding.

A good example is a common one.. take two similar streams (width, depth, substrate, similar region)

Stream A in an urban area and average baseflow is 1.25 cubic ft/s, and during storm events peaks at 7 cubic ft/s.

Stream B in a rural area and average baseflow is 1.50 cubic ft/s, and during storm events peaks at 4 cubic ft/s.

Vegetation does a remarkable job of catching water..

Posted by Tiger Ryno
#WoF
Member since Feb 2007
108716 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 1:09 pm to
Interesting. Are there specific developments you have in mind?
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 1:14 pm to
quote:


Interesting. Are there specific developments you have in mind


USGS has done a few studies on the subject. It seems common sense enough.. water traveling along impervious surfaces reach streams more quickly than it should. Large amounts of water in a short amount of time = flooding. Increasing the amount of water (or decreasing the time it takes to reach a stream) = increased chance for flooding.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
139208 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 1:14 pm to
Seems like creating huge elevation changes that channel massive point sources of water into concentrated areas is a huge factor. Ag land that used to absorb water has been converted to res areas that funnel all the water to a tributary via storm water ponds.
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
66462 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 1:17 pm to



























Posted by Layabout
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2011
11082 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

It's a huge problem. I do a lot of stormwater work.. end result is that unchecked development puts money in builders pockets short term and takes money out of taxpayers pockets long-term.


What's your opinion of drainage/overflow ponds? I'm seeing these in Florida adjacent to a lot of large new paved development like a school or a shopping center, sort of like an offset.
This post was edited on 8/16/16 at 1:26 pm
Posted by litenin
Houston
Member since Mar 2016
2818 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 1:25 pm to
I live in the Houston area and believe that the recent flooding was made worse by some developments (although I'm no expert in this area).

I have family in Youngsville (La.) and the flooding there was worse (by far) than I've ever seen. I recall other huge rain events including hurricanes and tropical storms (including Allison in '01 before it hit Houston) but do not know how the rainfall totals compare. I do know that Youngsville has had quite a bit of development over the past decade plus.
Posted by the LSUSaint
Member since Nov 2009
15444 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 1:26 pm to
quote:

done incorrectly or neglected, development can exacerbate flash flooding problems.


There is one house in my division that got 1" or so of water and ruined all flooring and more. Yes thinking he's gonna sue the association and parish. One of the main culverts under a bridge that crosses the coulee, was half grown over by vines planted nearby. It's the half that's usually above waterline at all times.
They were catching lots of debris and I have very little doubt if not there, his home would not have flash flooded.
Posted by Hammertime
Will trade dowsing rod for titties
Member since Jan 2012
43031 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 1:32 pm to
The concrete and lack of drainage enhancements most definitely made it worse. Think of filling a bath tub with a fire hose while the plug is out. There was just too much coming in too quickly. Better drainage would've prolonged it, but made the severity much less. It was gonna happen to some extent either way

quote:

What like trees and grass?
Yes. If you're gonna concrete everything, you need to figure out a way to slow the water since there isn't anything to do it anymore


Eta: That applies to the lower LP/EBR/AP areas. Other areas flood regularly because of their location, topography, and a few other factors
This post was edited on 8/16/16 at 1:37 pm
Posted by Black n Gold
Member since Feb 2009
16020 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 1:36 pm to
quote:

When you have phrases like "1,000 year rain event" it's pretty difficult to plan for that.


These seem to be occurring every 4-5 years. Weird.
Posted by EA6B
TX
Member since Dec 2012
14754 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 1:53 pm to
I believe a large probable is the government subsidized flood insurance, a lot of residential development would not have been built were it not for the availability of the insurance. When the private insurance industry will not underwrite the insurance because of the risk and the government has to provide it, you can be assured it is a really bad idea. I liken it to the rising cost of college, which has risen because of federally insured student loans that have enabled too many student to attend college that had no business going. Banks would have never taken the risk with the students on loans if they were not federally insured. Any time the government artificially interferes with the markets the outcome will be bad things happening over the long term
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 1:53 pm to
Government corruption arising from flood zone designations are a big problem. Developers prize these designations. There is no telling what goes on when they make those flood maps.

We really should find a way to get rid of federal flood insurance then these people and banks would not be so careless in building homes in flood prone areas. Would probably have to buy all the property in the area and then auction it off stating it could not be insured with subsidized flood insurance.
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 1:54 pm to
quote:


What's your opinion of drainage/overflow ponds? I'm seeing these in Florida adjacent to a lot of large new paved development like a school or a shopping center, sort of like an offset.


They are damn near mandatory for large developments ...they really help a tremendous amount if the development is designed properly at least.

Most of them are sized for 100+ year storm events.

I've seen a lot of really effective lots using permeable concrete with a type of bioretention storage beneath it. That's probably the future.. it works, it saves space, and it looks nice. The downside is the expense but personally id rather put that on the developer and not on the consumer via taxes
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram