- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 10/1/25 at 8:19 am to OH NO
Posted on 10/1/25 at 8:24 am to OH NO
quote:
But 30%?
Wow
that doesn't mean 30% of all kids have a different father than on their birth certificate. Anyone who is getting a paternity test already expects the kid isn't theirs. This stat is pretty meaningless.
Another new incel. Sweet, just what the board needed.
Posted on 10/1/25 at 10:43 am to OH NO
What about a scenario where the child has some sort of genetic medical condition that both the mother and "father" don't have any history of in their family? Would the mother do the right thing for the child and come clean that there may be a possibility of different genes causing this condition or does she just continue to string the "father" and child along for the rest of eternity just to protect herself? It would take a cold-hearted selfish bitch to lie about something like that instead of giving the kid a chance to find out why they have the condition.
Posted on 10/1/25 at 1:18 pm to jchamil
quote:
that doesn't mean 30% of all kids have a different father than on their birth certificate. Anyone who is getting a paternity test already expects the kid isn't theirs. This stat is pretty meaningless.
No, it was men whose name was on the birth certificate challenging the paternity.
30% bruh.
Probably only 10 or 20 percent of "fathers" in the general public aren't really the fathers.
This post was edited on 10/1/25 at 1:20 pm
Posted on 10/1/25 at 1:29 pm to OH NO
quote:
Most men are such pussies that they are afraid to demand a DNA Test or Prenup.
Maybe just marry a woman who isn't a cheating whore. I know it's hard for some of you dumbasses to comprehend this, but not all women are whores. Just b/c you married one doesn't mean the rest of us did too.
Posted on 10/1/25 at 1:32 pm to jchamil
quote:
Anyone who is getting a paternity test already expects the kid isn't theirs.
This is the problem. Normalize paternity testing.
Posted on 10/1/25 at 1:33 pm to ATrillionaire
In this thread, a bunch of so-called small government conservatives will argue for mandatory fricking DNA testing of babies and presentation of those results to the purported father.
Posted on 10/1/25 at 1:36 pm to Tornado Alley
quote:
In this thread, a bunch of so-called small government conservatives will argue for mandatory fricking DNA testing of babies and presentation of those results to the purported father.
I'm sure you'd argue for proper identification in other aspects of life. Weird that anyone would argue against properly identifying paternity. It's ok to protect yourself. A prenup doesn't mean you mistrust your significant other.
Posted on 10/1/25 at 1:39 pm to TeddyPadillac
quote:
Maybe just marry a woman who isn't a cheating whore.
Dumb on multiple levels.
Posted on 10/1/25 at 1:40 pm to ATrillionaire
quote:
I'm sure you'd argue for proper identification in other aspects of life. Weird that anyone would argue against properly identifying paternity. It's ok to protect yourself. A prenup doesn't mean you mistrust your significant other.
Don't create a strawman or false equivalency.
Address the topic of my post, which is a bunch of so-called "small government conservatives" in this thread wanting government intrusion into the most sacred and personal of spaces - a man's relationship between his spouse and child.
Posted on 10/1/25 at 1:44 pm to Tornado Alley
quote:
Address the topic of my post, which is a bunch of so-called "small government conservatives" in this thread wanting government intrusion into the most sacred and personal of spaces - a man's relationship between his spouse and child.
Allegedly
Posted on 10/1/25 at 2:11 pm to CharlesUFarley
quote:
In most States, the results of a DNA test don't matter if you are married, you are still legally and financially responsible for the child.
What states? This sounds like some Commie BS
Posted on 10/2/25 at 8:08 am to boogiewoogie1978
It's based on laws that are over a hundred years old. They did social engineering even way back then.
In most states, or maybe just many, if you are married, it doesn't matter what the DNA test comes back with, there is an ancient law that says something like "the only way a husband can claim that his wife's child is not his is if he can prove he was 100's a miles away or was impotent at the time of conception."
These laws have typically never been updated, probably because lawyers make too much money off of them, and feminists keep lobbying for "what is best for the children" when what they really mean is "what best protects the adulteress."
In most states, or maybe just many, if you are married, it doesn't matter what the DNA test comes back with, there is an ancient law that says something like "the only way a husband can claim that his wife's child is not his is if he can prove he was 100's a miles away or was impotent at the time of conception."
These laws have typically never been updated, probably because lawyers make too much money off of them, and feminists keep lobbying for "what is best for the children" when what they really mean is "what best protects the adulteress."
Posted on 10/2/25 at 8:25 am to OH NO
quote:
Sad but true.
30% of the DNA tests in USA show that the "father" isn't the father.
Of course those are tests where the man is suspicious that he isn't the father, so I would expect that number to be higher than the general public.
But 30%?
Wow
no shite because most that have them done are already suspecious.
I do think you should need one before signing the BC or demanding child support but there are a lot of things to consider.
That DNA isnt getting destroyed right after, it will be abused by the government some how.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 8:49 am to OH NO
quote:
No, it was men whose name was on the birth certificate challenging the paternity.
30% bruh.
Right, and men challenging paternity already suspect the kid isn't theirs. This 30% stat is meaningless for all men at large. If you go paternity test every kid that 30% is going to drop a shite load.
Not all women are whores, but to incels I guess it makes you feel better to think that.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 9:26 am to CharlesUFarley
quote:
In most States, the results of a DNA test don't matter if you are married,
Incorrect. In most states, maybe all, if you are married, your name will be on the birth certificate and requires a court order to have it removed. I know someone who had this happen after he and his wife split up, with one of his children in Louisiana. A birth certificate is a legal document, and it always takes a court order or legal procedure to change it.
In Louisiana, it used to be that carried forward for 1 year after your marriage ended (why 1 year and not 9 months, I don't know). I know this for a fact because it happened to a family member in the late 70s, despite all parties acknowledging who the father was and was not. I am not sure that is true now.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 9:32 am to OH NO
How shitty of a person is a woman that knowingly lies about the father of her child and lets another man sign the birth certificate? It should be illegal.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 10:02 am to OH NO
My paternity test was the fact that if you put my kids newborn pics side by side with mine, my own mother couldn't tell which one was which.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 10:07 am to OH NO
quote:
30% of the DNA tests in USA show that the "father" isn't the father.
Of course those are tests where the man is suspicious that he isn't the father, so I would expect that number to be higher than the general public.
How many of those tests are court ordered as a result of a paternity suit, child support, etc? In that case, of course those tests would have a higher rate of others being the father. That's the whole point behind the suspicion to get the test done in the first place.
That doesn't mean that if you randomly tested all children that 30% of them wouldn't belong to the person that has been publicly declared as their biological father. That's such a shitty, illogical jump used to promote incel agendas and to tear down family systems.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News