Started By
Message

re: How do feel about Maternity and Paternity Leave

Posted on 8/10/16 at 2:05 pm to
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 8/10/16 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

Because in our culture, this is seen as discrimination, but my question is why?


Because it's sexist. Men are usually ok to go back to work a week after the kid is born. Not so for women. It gives men a great advantage over women in getting a job, almost regardless of the qualifications.
Posted by DupontsCircle
Dupont Circle
Member since Jun 2016
5823 posts
Posted on 8/10/16 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

I understand as I was there once and I quit to go to a much smaller, more relaxed firm

I wouldn't say I "burned out" though, it was a calculated decision as even though my current salary is higher than it was at the old firm, my overall earning potential is lower in the long term, but its worth it IMO



That's your choice. I mean, I work in the beltway. It's a competitive lucrative market. Some folks don't have that luxury.
Posted by Peazey
Metry
Member since Apr 2012
25427 posts
Posted on 8/10/16 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

This is already covered by FMLA.


If we can at least establish that this is justified then we can see where that takes us in regards to paid leave or leave in general. Either way there is at least a defense for the FMLA which is itself a mandate against the free markets in everything people.

quote:

I don't conflate ethics and mandates.


The thing is that we as society determine what mandates we think that the government should make based off of our own ethics which is based in some way on our societal values.

Really I have pretty ambivalent feelings about this subject. I'm just trying to see about an intelligent way to frame the conversation.

For example:

quote:

I do not think this is a basic human right. People choose to have children or not have children. It is not the government's responsibility to mandate how companies respond to this choice.


A fair enough position, and I don't think that I disagree with it.

However, there are further questions that arise. Is this something that society wants to protect? Does trying to protect it cost more than it benefits? What are the possible methods of funding? Does the definition of basic rights change as the prosperity of a society change?
Who is really valued in society? Etc.

Either way it's a better discussion than just simply saying that the free market fixes everything idea put forth by the amateur economists who can't get past an academic economic model that does a good job of explaining mechanics but doesn't actually give a good idea of what really happens in the real world.
Posted by LakeBreauxPre
Chicago
Member since Jul 2016
80 posts
Posted on 8/10/16 at 4:39 pm to
quote:

Because apparently minorities, pregnant women, women and every other disabled person wouldn't get a job without government interference.


Dude you are the definition of a ranter.
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
41875 posts
Posted on 8/10/16 at 5:38 pm to
ITT: "employers" who give minimum benefits are mad about minimum effort in return.



You get what you pay for a-hole.
This post was edited on 8/10/16 at 5:39 pm
Posted by Weaver
Madisonville, LA
Member since Nov 2005
28132 posts
Posted on 8/10/16 at 5:47 pm to
Hilary will fix it once she gets into office.
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
82341 posts
Posted on 8/10/16 at 6:21 pm to
Generally for, but it depends on the details. A relatively new employee shouldn't expect 6 or 12 weeks, for example.
Posted by NoHoTiger
So many to kill, so little time
Member since Nov 2006
46209 posts
Posted on 8/10/16 at 6:28 pm to
quote:

However, there are further questions that arise. Is this something that society wants to protect? Does trying to protect it cost more than it benefits? What are the possible methods of funding? Does the definition of basic rights change as the prosperity of a society change?
Who is really valued in society? Etc.

These are all good questions and they are not easily answered. Although they should certainly be debated by those smarter than I.
Posted by athenslife101
Member since Feb 2013
20642 posts
Posted on 8/10/16 at 7:04 pm to
My company is 3 months paternity, 5 months maternity I believe.
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
76373 posts
Posted on 8/10/16 at 7:05 pm to
I wish we would reduce other entitlement programs and push money into that.
Posted by dred24
In the south
Member since Nov 2006
1304 posts
Posted on 8/10/16 at 7:10 pm to
If woman wants to have baby then she should stay home, have baby, and then raise baby. I'm for mandatory 18 years of nonpaid time off. Or at the very least 5 years.
Men take off a week of vacation time.
Posted by TigerLicks
Dallas, TX
Member since Oct 2003
11609 posts
Posted on 8/10/16 at 7:23 pm to
Paternity leave for a healthy baby? Might as well go gay porn while you're at it.
Jump to page
Page First 10 11 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 12 of 12Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram